View clinical trials related to Lacerations.
Filter by:This trial is a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial of adults and children (ages 7 to less than 70 years). Patients who present to the ED and who undergo minor bedside procedures that require local anesthesia will be divided into two groups: The first group will be treated with 0.7 mg/kg intranasal ketamine as well as standard local anesthesia for the procedure (treatment cohort). The second group will be treated with a volume-based dose of intranasal saline solution as well as standard local anesthesia for the procedure (control cohort). The primary aim is to assess whether patients in the treatment cohort report lower pain scores on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-100) when compared to patients in the control cohort. For adult patients, a secondary aim is to compare agitation between the two cohorts using the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) and, for pediatric patients, a secondary aim is to compare alertness between the two cohorts using the University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS). Results obtained from specific procedures will be analyzed on a spectrum of complexity and general length of recovery time. Scientific achievements may include finding a safe and effective way to reduce pain and discomfort during minor procedures in the Emergency Department. Additionally, it would provide opportunities for more research on sub-dissociative doses of ketamine during minor procedures: a topic in which there is still a gap in the published research
The aim of this study is to compare the traditional dorsal double injection digital block with the palmar single injection technique in the suturing of acute traumatic hand finger lacerations in terms of injection pain score (NRS), anesthesia onset time, and success of anesthesia. It is understood that single injection digital block and double injection digital block techniques do not have significant advantages over each other in terms of pain levels and procedure times. However, the need for rescue anesthesia was evaluated to be lower in the single injection digital block technique. This difference is especially due to measurements in the volar region incisions. According to the results of this study, we think that choosing the single injection digital block technique for volar region incisions is a more rational approach, especially in terms of the data of the need for rescue anesthesia.
The purpose of this study is to generate safety and performance data for 3M™ Topical Tissue Adhesive. Enrolled subjects with qualifying trauma lacerations or surgical incisions will be randomized to receive 3M™ Topical Tissue Adhesive or Histoacryl® Blue Topical Skin Adhesive with follow-up visits at 10 days and 30 days after application of tissue adhesive.
The objective of the study is to collect and evaluate clinical data on patients of the Lifetech Cera™ Vascular Plug System to: - confirm the performance - confirm the safety - identify previously unknown side-effects - monitor the identified side-effects (related to the procedures or to the medical devices) - identify and analyse emergent risks
The PROP(ofol)-study (EU CT number: 2022-502292-39-00, protocol number: ) is a clinical trial phase IV single centre prospective randomized controlled trial with parallel groups. A total of 80 women who undergoes examination and repair of obstetric perineal lacerations (grade I and II) are randomized into two arms (1:1); analgesia with pudendal nerve block (PNB) with ropivacaine (clinical routine, control group), or analgesia with PNB in combination with patient-controlled sedation with propofol (PCS, PCS group). The hypothesis is that PNB in combination with PCS improves patient experienced pain/discomfort during the examination and repair of the perineal laceration. The primary endpoint is patient experienced pain/discomfort. Secondary endpoints are time of repairing the perineal laceration, ability to have skin-to-skin contact with the baby during perineal repair, time until micturition after the perineal repair, procedure feasibility, amount of drugs used during perineal repair, and use of pain relief 24h postpartum. The study is planned to start during the second half of 2023 and end during the first half of 2024.
The prevalence of perineal lacerations is more than 75% of all vaginal deliveries. The repair of such lacerations in our institution is usually done using lidocaine for non-epiduralized patients versus no local injection in patients with a pre-existing epidural analgesia. The prevalence of epidural analgesia use among women who underwent vaginal delivery in cross-sectional study of over 2 million deliveries in the United States was 71.1%. Once the analgesic effect of the epidural analgesia fades, the laceration may cause uncontrolled postpartum pain which can affect both the physical and mental recovery period, extend hospital stays, and increase the potential for serious adverse reactions with pain medications. The research hypothesis of this study is that adding a locally injected analgesic, which will take effect once the epidural analgesia fades, may alleviate perineal pain and improve women's overall well-being and satisfaction. The proposed trial is a two-arm, single-masked, prospective randomized superiority control trial. Women with a working epidural analgesia, and status post a vaginal delivery involving a second-degree laceration will be invited to participate. Women in the local anesthesia (LA) arm will get a LA injected to the laceration and women in the sham arm will get an injection with saline. The differences in perineal pain between the groups will be evaluated at time of the first analgesic (TFA) demand, maternal satisfaction at 24 hours, and visual analog scale (VAS) pain score.
Pain in young children has been universally under-recognized due to their inability to describe or localize pain. Improvements in pharmacological interventions are necessary to optimize patient and family experience and allow for successful and efficient procedure completion. This is the first study that will compare three intranasal medications (Intranasal Midazolam, Dexmedetomidine, and Ketamine) to evaluate the length of stay after medication administration along with patient and provider satisfaction. The objective of this study is to demonstrate superior intranasal anxiolysis for pediatric laceration repairs with the shortest emergency department stay and highest patient and provider satisfaction. Based on previous studies and medication pharmacokinetics, we hypothesize that Intranasal Ketamine will have the shortest Emergency Department (ED) stay followed by Midazolam and then Dexmedetomidine with the longest stay; however, Dexmedetomidine will have the highest patient and provider satisfaction followed by Ketamine and then Midazolam.
It is unknown if bystanders equipped with point-of-care (POC) instruction are as effective as bystanders with in-person training for bleeding control. Therefore, POC instructional interventions were developed during this study in response to the scalability challenges associated with in-person training to measure the comparative effectiveness and skill retention of POC instructions vs in-person training using a randomized clinical trial design.
The overall purpose of this proposed study is the understanding of cellular mechanisms involved in the pathologic fatty degeneration of muscle. Fatty infiltration in skeletal muscle is observed following sports injuries such as muscle strain injuries and Achilles tendon rupture. It is also observed in the degenerative state after rotator cuff tears as well as in the aging process. While fatty degeneration of skeletal muscle occurs in many different conditions and is known to decrease muscle function, the cellular processes involved in fatty infiltration have not been investigated in human muscle. Hypotheses: 1. There is a high amount of fibro-adipogenic progenitors (FAPs) with an adipogenic pattern in pathologic skeletal muscle following a muscle strain injury and a full Achilles tendon rupture. We hypothesize that there is an increased number of FAPs with an adipogenic signature already in the acute phase after a strain injury, but a significantly higher number in the chronic stage as well as in the muscle following an Achilles tendon rupture. 2. Mechanical cues are a major driver of the phenotypic drift of FAPs. The lack of mechanical stimuli initiates the adoption of an adipogenic pathway in naïve FAPs, whereas naïve FAPs exposed to mechanical stimuli will maintain their undifferentiated phenotype. 3. The adherence of FAPs to a soft material will activate the adoption of an adipogenic phenotype, whereas a stiff material will favor a more fibrotic phenotype in naïve FAP's isolated from healthy skeletal muscle.
Background: Replacing a valve in the heart can save many people s lives. The procedure is called transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). In rare cases, a flap of tissue called a leaflet can shift during TAVR; the leaflet may block blood flow to the coronary arteries, which supply blood to the heart muscle. About 50% of people who experience this problem will die. To reduce this risk, doctors will cut this leaflet during TAVR. But the tools used to cut the leaflet were originally designed for other purposes. Using these tools during TAVR can be complicated and risky. Researchers want to make TAVR safer. Objective: To test a new device (TELLTALE) designed specifically for use during TAVR. Eligibility: People aged 21 years and older who are undergoing TAVR and who are at high risk of coronary artery obstruction. Design: Participants will be screened. They will have routine tests that are done before undergoing TAVR. Before the procedure, participants will complete a questionnaire. They will talk about how their heart disease affects their quality of life. Their physical abilities and their risk of stroke will be assessed. Participants will be admitted to the hospital for TAVR. They will be placed under general anesthesia or moderate sedation. The procedure will be performed using the TELLTALE guidewire system. Participants will repeat the tests of their physical abilities after the procedure. They will also repeat the questionnaire about their quality of life. These will be repeated again at a follow-up visit in 30 days. Participants will have a final study visit after 90 days. This visit may be in person or remote.