View clinical trials related to Lacerations.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to generate safety and performance data for 3M™ Topical Tissue Adhesive. Enrolled subjects with qualifying trauma lacerations or surgical incisions will be randomized to receive 3M™ Topical Tissue Adhesive or Histoacryl® Blue Topical Skin Adhesive with follow-up visits at 10 days and 30 days after application of tissue adhesive.
The objective of the study is to collect and evaluate clinical data on patients of the Lifetech Cera™ Vascular Plug System to: - confirm the performance - confirm the safety - identify previously unknown side-effects - monitor the identified side-effects (related to the procedures or to the medical devices) - identify and analyse emergent risks
The prevalence of perineal lacerations is more than 75% of all vaginal deliveries. The repair of such lacerations in the institution is usually done using lidocaine for non-epiduralized patients versus no local injection in patients with a pre-existing epidural analgesia. The prevalence of epidural analgesia use among women who underwent vaginal delivery in cross-sectional study of over 2 million deliveries in the United States was 71.1%. Once the analgesic effect of the epidural analgesia fades, the laceration may cause uncontrolled postpartum pain which can affect both the physical and mental recovery period, extend hospital stays, and increase the potential for serious adverse reactions with pain medications. The research hypothesis of this study is that adding a locally injected analgesic, which will take effect once the epidural analgesia fades, may alleviate perineal pain and improve women's overall well-being and satisfaction. This is a superiority two-arm, quadruple-blinded, prospective randomized controlled trial with the objective to determine if prolonged analgesia and higher rate of maternal satisfaction are found when bupivacaine with epinephrine infiltration is used for perineal repair as compared to sham injection in patients with pre-existing effective epidural analgesia at time of perineal laceration repair. Women with a working epidural analgesia, and status post a vaginal delivery involving a second-degree laceration will be invited to participate. Women in the local anesthesia (LA) arm will get a LA injected to the laceration and women in the sham arm will get an injection with saline. The differences in perineal pain between the groups will be evaluated at time of the first analgesic (TFA) demand, maternal satisfaction at 24 hours, and visual analog scale (VAS) pain score.
The purpose of the study is to compare the effectiveness of a combination of intranasal fentanyl and intranasal midazolam to intranasal midazolam alone for analgesia and anxiolysis in patients presenting for facial laceration repair in the pediatric emergency department.
Background: Skin tears (ST) or "laceration injuries" or "flap wounds" are injuries that are often found in residents of residential care facilities (RCFs). STs were first defined by Payne and Martin in 1993 as traumatic wounds, located mainly in the upper limbs, caused by "shearing, friction or mechanisms combined with the consequent separation of layers of skin. Skin Tears can cause psychological problems for the patient and represent an economic problem with important repercussions on both the patient and the community. The etiology suggests that the physiological changes of the skin related to old age, together with comorbidity, are among the main risk factors for their onset. The precise data on the phenomenon are not many, but it is estimated that STs are much more frequent than the same pressure ulcers, observing prevalence rates in RCFs around 40% Therefore, there are several risk factors hypothesized so far. Much evidence has correlated, in various physiological or pathological conditions, the role of estrogens with the functions and aging of the skin. Objectives: The project will develop on the analysis of populations of residents from RCFs belonging to the national territory. Two populations of residents cared in the RCF will be recruited. A group of subjects suffering from skin tears (group A) and a control group of subjects without skin tears (group B). The inclusion of patients in both groups will take place through a simple randomization procedure. Group A patients will be staged according to the STAR classification for skin tears. For each group a peripheral venous blood sample will be taken (to measure the levels of estrone and estradiol) and a skin biopsy will be performed in order to measure estrogen receptors (ERs) expression. A data collection sheet with angraphic and anamnestic data will be developed to correlate the demographic and comorbidity data with the clinical conditions of the patients and with the laboratory findings from the sampling. Expected results: The primary endpoint will be the correlation between serum estrogen levels, receptor expression and the presence of skin tears. The secondary endopoint will be Correlation between receptor structure and clinical staging of skin tears. Future prospectives: We believe that our study may open new frontiers in the prevention and in the management of these skin lesions.
The investigators are comparing the combination of a stainless steel repair and aggressive early active range of motion rehabilitation protocol for flexor tendon lacerations in the hand with a current, accepted treatment offered at our institution. Outcomes to be assessed will be time to return to work, joint range of motion in the injured fingers, and any potential complications that may arise (ex: surgical infections or repair rupture). All proposed treatments included in this study are currently being offered at our institution, but not in a randomized fashion.
To assess the difference in clinical outcome between lacerations in the hand treated by sutures versus treated by tissue adhesive.