View clinical trials related to Knee Osteoarthritis.
Filter by:For the first time in Russia, it is planned to introduce a system of personalized preoperative planning, applying the concept of kinematic alignment in robotic knee arthroplasty. Aim: to improve the results of robotic knee alignment by developing and implementing a personalized approach in preoperative planning. Objectives: to develop a system of personalized robotic knee arthroplasty; implementation of the system in clinical practice, to determine indications, contraindications; study of the results of personalized endoprosthetics, comparison with the results of mechanical alignment; detection of complications; development of an algorithm and protocol for personalized endoprosthetics. It is planned to conduct an open retrospective and prospective clinical study in parallel groups. The study is planned to include 150 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee joint stage 3-4 (according to Kellgren-Lawrence). The methodology developed and improved in the dissertation will be introduced into the work of the clinical Departments of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Disaster Surgery, studying the learning curve.
To determine if robotically-assisted UKA results in more consistent and improved component positioning and better patient reported outcome scores compared to manual TKA and MAKO TKA.
This is a pilot cluster randomized controlled trial to to evaluate the individual and health system impacts of implementing a new physiotherapist-led primary care model for hip and knee pain in Canada.
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common type of arthritis, characterized by pain and physical disability. More than 10% of persons > 55 years have symptomatic OA, primarily involving the knees. Knee arthroplasty is considered a successful orthopaedic procedure in progressed knee OA (KOA) with severe pain and disability where non-surgical treatments have been tried. It has long been recognized that injury to the body, either from trauma or surgery causes an inflammatory response. As TKA is considered a more invasive procedure compared with UKA, TKA and UKA may not trigger inflammatory reactions of the same magnitude. Differences in inflammatory response between TKA and UKA could help explain why differences in outcome are present, despite both procedures being technically successful. Even though knee arthroplasty is a very common and successful procedure, there are no existing studies comparing the invasiveness of TKA and UKA. As morbidity and mortality rates differ between the groups, the aim of this prospective cohort study is to investigate whether the post-operative inflammatory responses differ between TKA and UKA, and secondarily whether this difference can explain the difference in outcome between the two procedures. The investigators hypothesize that TKA generates a larger postoperative systemic inflammatory response compared with UKA due to more extensive periarticular soft tissue and bone trauma. The study's primary outcome is C-reactive Protein (CRP) measured in blood 24 hours after surgery (22-26 hours after surgery ~ day 1). Participants which are candidates for either a TKA or a UKA will through serial blood test measurement have their postoperative systemic inflammatory response measured. This further will be correlated to the clinical and functional outcomes over a 2-years postoperative follow-up period.
Background: Patient's pain experience is a complex phenomenon. A comprehensive clinical assessment of the patient's pain experience is helpful to define individual differences between patients and thus to plan effective individualized treatment programs. Gait assessment is an important functional task in the clinical evaluation, which allows the definition and modulation of therapeutic intervention. The influence of patient's pain experience on gait parameters is currently understudied in literature. Objective: To investigate patient's pain experience based on an assessment model proposed by Walton and Elliott in patients with knee OA. The study's second aim is to examine the correlation between the parameters of the 10 Meter Walking Test (10MWT) and Time Up and Go test (TUG) assessed by an inertial sensor and the patient's pain experience.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare a pain informed movement program to standard neuromuscular exercise in people with knee osteoarthritis. The main question it aims to answer are: 1. Are the two interventions a) pain informed movement program plus pain neuroscience education and b) neuromuscular exercise plus standard osteoarthritis education feasible in terms of recruitment, treatment adherence, timelines, data collection procedures, patient follow-up, and resources required? 2. Is there a difference in patient's satisfaction and acceptability of the two programs? 3. Are there any differences in the potential effects of the two programs on subjective pain measures, self-reported function, quality of life, functional leg strength, nervous system pain modulation, brain derived neurotrophic factor and nerve growth factor levels, and psychological factors?
The aim of this randomized controlled study is to investigate whether the implementation of Blood Flow Restriction, in which the de-loading factor is delivered by the combined progressive de-loaded walking to running activity on an antigravity treadmill (treatment group), is more effective than the same antigravity protocol alone (control group). Participants will be divided as follows: Intervention group: anti-gravity treadmill combined with blood flow restriction Control group: anti-gravity treadmill Both groups will also undergo a standardized knee Osteoarthritis management through an aerobic and strength program.
In this clinical trial the investigator assess the safety and efficacy of a single injection of a combination of cross-linked hyaluronic acid (HA) with autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) obtained with the RegenMatrix medical device to improve symptoms of moderate to severe knee osteoarthitis (grade III-IV Kellgren-Lawrence).
The goal of this clinical trial is to test using a pain and anxiety reduction phone application in older adults with knee osteoarthritis and chronic pain. The main questions it seeks to answer are: 1. How acceptable is using a phone app in older adults with knee osteoarthritis and chronic pain to lower pain, pain stress and reduce fear of movement? 2. What are the effects of combining biofeedback with a virtual reality nature scene and paced breath training to increase heart rate variability on pain and anxiety among older adults with knee osteoarthritis? 3. What is the role of self-regulation and body awareness in predicting or strengthening the effect of combining virtual reality, heart rate variability biofeedback in older adults with knee osteoarthritis?. Participants will be asked to: 1. use a phone application for 7-10 minute sessions twice daily 5 days a week for 8 weeks. 2. receive relaxation reminders weeks 9 through 12 to see if use continues past the intervention phase. 3. complete surveys describing pain, physical activity, fear of movement, body awareness and self-regulation, pain stress pre/post the app use. 4. complete a survey and interview after 8 weeks of phone app use to describe the experience of its use.
For the first time, it is planned to create algorithms for working with a robotic system at different patient flow rates, optimize the use of computed tomography to assess bone density and pronounced osteophytes, develop an algorithm and tactics for treating bilateral osteoarthrosis of the knee joint using an active robotic system. Aim: optimization of total knee arthroplasty using robotic systems and improvement of treatment outcomes. Objectives: to develop algorithms for preoperative planning, surgical intervention using an active robotic system; to improve the technique of active robotic total knee arthroplasty in osteoporosis, osteosclerosis and pronounced osteophytes; to develop a tactic for the treatment of patients with bilateral osteoarthrosis of the knee joint using an active robotic system. It is planned to conduct an open-label retrospective and prospective clinical study in parallel observations.The study is planned to include 250 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee joint stage 3-4 (according to Kellgren-Lawrence). The methodology developed and improved in the dissertation will be introduced into the work of the clinical Departments of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Disaster Surgery, studying the learning curve.