View clinical trials related to Ischemic Heart Disease.
Filter by:Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death worldwide, with ischemic heart disease (IHD) the leading cause of cardiovascular mortality. Persons with IHD suffering from psychological distress, including hopelessness, are more likely to die from IHD. Following a stressful event, the vagus nerve enables activation of either a sympathetic (fight/flight) or parasympathetic (rest/digest) response. Heart rate variability (HRV), the beat-to-beat variability between normal successive heart beats, is a biomarker of both adaptive and maladaptive reactions to stress. Decreased HRV predicts greater risk for morbidity and mortality and is associated with poor mental health outcomes in persons with IHD. As stated by polyvagal theory, HRV may be influenced by social support. Decreased perceived social support (PSS), a social determinant of cardiovascular risk, is predictive of increased morbidity and mortality in persons with IHD. Decreased PSS has been associated with hopelessness in patients with cancer, but this relationship has not been studied in IHD beyond the applicant's small pilot study of patients with hopelessness. Hopelessness, a negative outlook and sense of helplessness about the future, is present in 27-52% of patients with IHD. This is of grave concern, because hopelessness is associated with a 3.4 times increased risk of mortality and nonfatal myocardial infarction in patients with IHD, independent of depression. This research focuses on understanding the biological (HRV) and social (PSS) aspects of hopelessness, with the long-term goal of developing and testing novel interventions to reduce the adverse effects of hopelessness and improve health outcomes in patients with IHD. Participants for this cross-sectional study will be recruited while hospitalized for an IHD event. Participants will include patients who report moderate to severe hopelessness from the sponsor's NIH-funded study (n = 225); additional patients with minimal to no hopelessness will be recruited and enrolled by the applicant (n = 45). Data collection will take place remotely two weeks after hospital discharge. Specific aims include: Aim 1) Evaluate the relationship between HRV and hopelessness in patients with IHD; Aim 2) Determine the relationship between PSS and hopelessness in patients with IHD; and Aim 3) Explore the possible mediating effect of HRV on the relationship between PSS and hopelessness in patients with IHD.
Biosensors, the Sponsor would like to determine if the Biosensors Microcatheter is safe and effective in treating patients with CTO by assessing a composite of in-hospital cardiac death or myocardial infarction and device success (defined as successfully facilitate placement of a guidewire beyond the occluded coronary segment), respectively.
BACKGROUND: Advanced treatment regimens have reduced cardiovascular mortality resulting in an increasingly older Ischemic Heart Disease (IHD) population in need of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) , the majority (74%) is above 60 years. The positive effect of CR is well established; CR reduces cardiovascular mortality, lowers hospital admissions, and improves quality of life among patients with IHD. These positive effects of CR has also been established among older patients. The inherent problem lies in the low attendance rate, often below 50%. Several studies, including studies from Denmark, have shown that low participation in CR is most prevalent among older, vulnerable and female patients. The notion vulnerable covers patients with low socioeconomic position (SEP), patients with non-western background and patients living alone, as these groups have particularly low CR attendance. Effective interventions aiming at increasing CR attendance among these low attending groups are thus warranted and the current study will seek to address this. AIM: To test the effect of a peer-mentor intervention among older vulnerable IHD patients. DESIGN AND METHODS: The study is designed as a two arm RCT-study applying mixed methods. Power calculations were based upon primary outcome 'Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) attendance'. Proportion attending CR in control group was set at 25% and intervention group at 50% based upon previous research. With a 5% significance level and 80% power. 110 patients were required (55 in each group) to have a 80% chance of detecting, as significant at the 5% level, an increase in the primary outcome measure from 25% in the control group to 50% in the experimental group. Expected dropout was 6%. I.e., in total 117 patients are enrolled. Patients (n=117) are recruited by a dedicated research nurse before discharge from the cardiology department at Nordsjællands Hospital and randomized (with 1:1 individual randomisation) to peer-mentor intervention or usual care. Data is collected through both qualitative and quantitative data (mixed methods). Data is collected at three timepoints, baseline, 12 weeks and 24 weeks. The patients (mentees) are matched with peer-mentors. Peer-mentoring (i.e. mentoring by a person with a similar life situation or health problem as one self) is a low-cost intervention that holds the potential to improve CR attendance and improve physical and psychological outcomes among older patients. Peer-mentors are role models who can guide and support patients overcoming barriers of CR attendance. Peer-mentoring is unexplored in a CR setting among older, female and vulnerable IHD patients; establishing the novelty of the current study.
The trial will include 75 patients with evident or suspected ischemic heart disease refered to Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, for perfusion imaging by 15O-H2O PET/CT scan of the heart during rest and stress. Instead of the clinical scan participants will undergo perfusion imaging by 15O-H2O PET/MR. The clinician will receive diagnostic information based on the 15O-H2O PET scan as if the patient had not participated in the study. As such, the study has no influence on the diagnostics or treatments of the patient. Data from the scans will be used to compare 15O-H2O PET with cardiac MR for evaluation of myocardial perfusion. Follow up will be done for up to 10 years in regards to major cardiovascular events in order to determine the prognostic value of the scan.
The study was a multicenter, two-arm, parallel, open label, prospective study intended for to compare effect of offline community hospital intervention on adherence to drugs and risk factors control in patients with stable coronary artery disease compared with tertiary A-level hospital WeChat-based intervention.
This was a Phase 2 prospective, randomized, crossover study of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection for PET-MPI in participants referred for evaluation of known coronary artery disease (CAD) or for suspected CAD with intermediate to high pre-test probability (PTP). The objective is to assess the difference and variability between 2 sets of rest images synthesized by the same or 2 different manufacturing processes. Twenty-eight evaluable [participants were enrolled in this study and underwent 2 Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET-MPI at rest. Each participant attended a Screening Visit at least 2 days and up to 14 days prior to the first Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET-MPI. The participants were randomized 1:1:1:1 to 4 possible sequences of receiving 2 doses of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection: 2 groups of 7 participants received 2 Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection doses synthesized by the same manufacturing processes (either HPLC or SPE) and 2 groups of 7 subjects will receive 2 Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection doses synthesized by different manufacturing processes (1 dose by HPLC followed by 1 dose by SPE or 1 dose by SPE followed by 1 dose by HPLC). All participants were followed up by telephone for adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) at 24 (+8) hours following each Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection administration.
The effects of SGB on the cardiovascular system remain controversial since the cardiac sympathetic nerves pass through the stellate ganglion. SGB is expected to have an ameliorative effect on impaired coronary circulation and cardiac function and thus to be well suited to the treatment of angina pectoris and myocardial infarction
The presence of myocardial ischemia is the most important prognostic indicator in patients with coronary artery disease. Therefore, the purpose of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is to relieve myocardial ischemia caused by the target stenosis. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an invasive physiologic index used to define functionally significant coronary stenosis, and its prognostic implications are supported by numerous studies. Contrary to the clear cutoff value and the benefit of FFR in pre-PCI evaluation, there have been various results regarding optimal cut-off values for post-PCI FFR. Nevertheless, the positive association between post-PCI FFR and the risk of future events has been reproduced by several studies. PCI with stent implantation is basically a local treatment and post-PCI FFR reflects both residual stenosis in the stented segment and remaining disease beyond the stented segment in the target vessel(s). Therefore, post-PCI FFR alone cannot fully discriminate the degree of contribution of each component. The relative increase of FFR with PCI is determined by the interaction of baseline severity of a target lesion, baseline disease burden of a target vessel, adequacy of PCI and residual disease burden in a target vessel. However, the most important problem in stratifying patients with better expected post-PCI physiologic results and following clinical outcome would be that there has been no clear method to identify these patients in pre-PCI phase. In this regard, we hypothesized that the amount of FFR step-up in pre-PCI pullback recording would determine the physiologic nature of target stenosis. For example, stenosis with sufficient step-up of FFR would deserve local treatment with PCI and these lesions would result in higher percent FFR increase, post-PCI FFR, and better clinical outcome than those without sufficient amount of FFR step-up. For this, we sought to develop automated algorithm to define physiologic major stenosis versus minor stenosis using pre-PCI pullback recording.
Coronary physiologic assessments by the pressure-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) have become standard methods for identifying hemodynamic deprivation in coronary arterial stenosis for evidence-based percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Invasive physiologic indices-guidance enables on-site real time assessment for functional significance of epicardial coronary stenosis and the use of those indices has shown to be effective to guide treatment decision. Several studies further support the role of post-PCI FFR measurement as a functional marker of residual disease after PCI and prognostic indicator of patients. Although optimal cut-off values of post-PCI FFR varied across studies, an inverse relationship between post-PCI FFR and the risk of future clinical events have been reported consistently. Recently, non-hyperemic pressure ratios (NHPRs) have been introduced in clinical practice. Although there are several different NHPRs, previous studies consistently indicated that those NHPRs shares similar diagnostic performance and prognostic implications. Nevertheless, few reports were available for clinical relevance of NHPRs in evaluation of post-PCI status. In this context, we will evaluate the physiologic characteristics and prognostic implication of post-PCI NHPRs and compare with those of post-PCI FFR in patients who underwent angiographically successful PCI with 2nd generation drug-eluting stent implantation (DES).
The overall objectives of the Optima project is to: (1) Compare the effect of standardized group based cognitive therapy and cardiac rehabilitation versus usual cardiac rehabilitation in patients with sign of psychological distress measured by a questionnaire (HADS score), (2) To investigate spontaneous variation in psychological distress with HADS over time in order to optimize time of measuring HADS. (3) To investigate if the intervention can be implemented to other cardiac rehabilitation sites with the same effect as on BFH (that it is not person dependent).