View clinical trials related to Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.
Filter by:ASCEND PLUS is testing whether, for people with type 2 diabetes who have not previously had a heart attack or stroke, regularly taking a tablet called semaglutide can safely help to reduce heart attacks, strokes, mini-strokes, the need for any procedures to unblock or bypass an artery to their heart, and the chance of dying because of vascular problems.
Evaluate the impact of conducting a screening questionnaire (FINDRISC) and the implementation of a point-of-care HBA1c test for those with identified risk to suffer Diabetes in ten years, to improve the proportion of patients attending for a confirmatory test ( oral glucose tolerance test ) and evaluate the impact of such a strategy to minimize type 2 diabetes outcomes.
Trial Design: This is a 12 week randomised controlled open label trial comparing the impact of Dapagliflozin, Metformin and combination therapy on vascular function in newly diagnosed T2DM patients.
The goal of this study is to examine the feasibility and potential effectiveness of a short (4 sessions) self-compassion intervention for adolescents with T1D and their caregivers on psychological, metabolic, and behavioral outcomes.
A Phase 1 Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of Cotadutide in Overweight/Obese Subjects with Chinese ancestry with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
This study will look at a new medicine, called IcoSema, for treatment of type 2 diabetes. IcoSema is a combination of a new insulin, called insulin icodec, and a GLP-1 receptor analogue, called semaglutide. Insulin icodec is a possible new medicine. That means that the medicine has not yet been approved by the authorities. Semaglutide is a medicine already approved by the authorities in the EU, USA, China and Japan. The study will look at the way insulin icodec and semaglutide reach and stay in participants blood after injection when given together as IcoSema or alone as insulin icodec and semaglutide. Participants will get each of the 3 medicines (IcoSema, insulin icodec and semaglutide) at 3 different timepoints: The order in which participants get them is decided by chance. Participants will get the 3 medicines as an injection under the skin in the thigh. The injections will be done by study staff. The time between injections is 6 to 9 weeks. The study will last for about 19 to 26 weeks. Participants will have 31 or 32 visits to the clinic. 3 of the visits will be in-house visits, meaning that participants will stay at the clinic for 5 or 6 days (4 or 5 nights). Women cannot take part if pregnant, breast-feeding or plan to get pregnant during the study period.
Comparison of residual gastric volume measure by ultrasounds between diabetic and non-diabetic patients scheduled for elective surgery
We are testing the effectiveness of an eHealth digital tool co-designed with patients and providers to improve diabetes self-efficacy in young adults as they transition to adult type 1 diabetes care.
Glucose monitoring after Acute Myocardial infarct in people with diabetes is a Dexcom funded feasibility study that is investigating whether the use of continuous glucose monitors (Dexcom G6 model) in people with type 2 diabetes facilitates time in glycaemic range in the 6 months after an acute myocardial infarction. As a secondary outcome it will investigate whether time in glycaemic range is associated with changes in mortality and major adverse cardiac events in the 6 months after acute myocardial infarct.
DBS (Dried blood spot) is the collection of a small volume of blood on paper cards and subsequent transport to an analytical laboratory. This method is widely used for newborn screening programs around the world to identify inborn errors of metabolism where early diagnosis and treatment can be lifesaving. The World Health Organization and World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) have independently endorsed DBS as an alternative to conventional testing methods due to its lessened invasiveness, lower collection and transport cost, reduction in sample storage needs, and for some analytes, improved sample stability. There are hundreds of publications describing DBS testing and some commercial ventures offering direct-to-consumer testing using DBS. However, it is not clear if there have been concerted efforts to develop DBS sampling for adults for home collection in concert with high quality, accredited central clinical laboratories. The proposal herein is focused on developing and validating DBS for at home and remote sample collections for routine diagnostic testing.