View clinical trials related to Intracranial Arteriosclerosis.
Filter by:The epidemiology of TOAST classification in Asian patients seems to differ due to the higher rates of large-artery atherosclerosis. The complex pathology of atherosclerosis could lead to recurrent stroke, including shear stress on the endothelium, disturbance of the flow, occlusion at the origin of the perforating artery, and other complications (plaque inflammation, plaque hemorrhage, plaque rupture) that could lead to stroke and recurrent stroke. Therefore, The exact determination of the etiology of stroke due to atherosclerosis is the most critical factor for treatment and prognostic. On the other hand, HR-MRI could be a useful imaging modality to evaluate the characteristics of plaque in stroke patients due to atherosclerosis stenosis, which will help us find out the etiology of stroke. Previous studies have demonstrated its prognosis value in predicting recurrent stroke in the same vascular territory. The investigators hypothesize that with an appropriate evaluation, HR-MRI could help to predict recurrent stroke in the same vascular territory in patients with high-risk plaque characteristics on HR-MRI. These findings could contribute to individual treatment according to etiology. The investigators intend to conduct a study to determine the correlation between plaque characteristics and recurrent stroke in the same vascular territory in ischemic stroke patients due to middle cerebral artery stenosis.
The purpose of this study is to explore the mechanism of cognitive impairment in patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS), and further plans to explore the impact of different treatment options on cognitive function in symptomatic ICAS patients.
Ischemic stroke with high incidence, mortality, disability and recurrence rate, has become the leading threat to the health worldwide. Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is commonly associated with ischemic stroke, especially in Chinese residents. Patients with severe ICAS are subject to a very high risk of recurrent stroke events, despite best medical therapy available. Unstable or complex atherosclerotic plaques can lead to plaque ruptures and distal embolisms, thereby increasing the risk of ischemic stroke recurrence. Studies have shown that activation of inflammatory states may play a driving role in the formation and development of atherosclerosis. So far, it remains unclear which are the best treatments for this condition, especially for high-risk patients. Dl-3-n-butylphthalide (NBP) is a Class I novel drug independently developed in China and was officially approved for use in acute ischemic stroke. Preclinical data showed that NBP can act multiple effects of anti-inflammation, antioxidation and anti-apoptosis by suppressing pro-inflammatory factors and upregulating the expression of anti-inflammatory factors. It is still undetermined whether combined therapy with NBP could enhance the curative effect of intracranial atherosclerosis. The primary purpose of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy of butylphthalide in reducing the degree of arterial stenosis and stabilizing plaques in patients with severe symptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy in ischemic stroke with intracranial artery stenosis. The main question it aims to answer are: whether aspirin combined with clopidogrel for 3 month is better than 1 months for patients with non-cardiogenic cerebral infarction with intracranial artery stenosis. Participants will get dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel) for 1 month or 3 months within 7 days of the first stroke. Researchers will compare experimental group (3 months dual antiplatelet therapy) with comparison group (1 month dual antiplatelet therapy), to see if experimental group would reduce stroke recurrence or mortality, and increase bleeding and other adverse prognosis.
This multicenter prospective cohort study aims to compare the difference in the effects of medical treatment within 1 year between the two groups of ICAS patients divided hemodynamically by Magnetic Resonance Fractional Flow Reserve. PC MRA will be applied for FFR measurement. The primary outcome is the composite of ischemic stroke or death related to the qualifying artery territory for 1 year.
Carotid ultrasonography has been proposed as a tool for prediction of future cardiovascular disease (CVD). Nevertheless, its role in clinical practice remains controversial. Methods: The investigators analyse the incidence of CVD and mortality in a cohort of 1004 participants without preexisting CVD according to a simple plaque scale recorded in different segments of the carotid artery assess by ultrasound. A prognostic tool for CV events was development adding Carotid Plaque-Burden (CPB) scale to the Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE2) table (CPB- SCORE2 scale).
The primary goal of the trial is to investigate whether the lipid lowering strategy using Alirocumab plus statin could cause more changes from baseline in intracranial atherosclerotic plaque and hemodynamic features during 6 months of follow-up, in patients with asymptomatic intracranial artery stenosis.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the safety and effectiveness of anticoagulation combined with antiplatelet therapy in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with concomitant non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and extracranial/intracranial artery stenosis. Participants will be 1:1 randomized into anticoagulation alone or anticoagulation combined with antiplatelet therapy. The primary endpoint is composite events 3 months after enrollment.
A multicenter, open-label, blinded-endpoint, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial with an "all comers" design.
In the symptomatic ischemic stroke, the decision-making of medical treatment plus intracranial stenting has been more and more popular, especially in patients with intracranial large severe stenosis or occlusive artery. Nonetheless, there were few evidences about times of intracranial stenting which compared beyond 7 days from acute ischemic stroke with the progressive ischemic stroke time. The purpose of this study was to compared the adverse events during 1-year follow-up of these two groups.