Clinical Trials Logo

Immunosuppression clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Immunosuppression.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT01910077 Completed - Immunosuppression Clinical Trials

Bioequivalence Study of Tacrobell Capsule 1mg to Prograf Capsule 1mg

Start date: August 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate bioequivalence between tacrobell capsule 1mg and prograf capsule 1mg.

NCT ID: NCT01824368 Completed - Clinical trials for Liver Transplantation

Extracorporeal Photopheresis in Liver Transplantation. Phase II Clinical Trial in Safety and Efficacy in Patients With Gradual Decrease of Immunosuppression.

FEC-TH
Start date: April 2013
Phase: Phase 1/Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety of extracorporeal photopheresis in patients with long-standing liver transplantation subjected to a progressive reduction of immunosuppression by complications arising from its use.

NCT ID: NCT01801280 Completed - Immunosuppression Clinical Trials

Influence of Pantoprazole on the Bioavailability of MMF and EC-MPS

Start date: January 2012
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The objective of this pharmacokinetic study is to examine a possible drug-drug interaction of Pantoprazole on the bioavailability mycophenolic acid.

NCT ID: NCT01733056 Completed - Immunosuppression Clinical Trials

Immune Response to Vaccination in Patients Receiving Single Drug Immunosuppression

Start date: January 2011
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Biomedical Lay Summary Title: Characterization of immune response to vaccination in patients receiving single-drug immunosuppressive therapy Principal Investigator: Robert Swerlick, MD Other Investigators: Rafi Ahmed, PhD Suephy Chen, MD Jens Wrammert, PhD Adam Sperduto 1. Problem of Interest We are proposing to study the effectiveness of vaccines in people who are taking drugs that affect the immune system. There are many populations of people who have chronic medical conditions that require them to have long-term treatment with immunosuppressive medications (drugs that decrease the function of the immune system). Examples of these patients include organ transplant recipients, patients with immune cell cancers such as leukemia and lymphoma, patients with inflammatory disorders such as lupus or scleroderma, and patients with skin conditions requiring steroid-based creams, ointments, pills, or injections. Patients who are taking these medications should receive appropriate vaccinations such as tetanus boosters, influenza vaccines, and pneumonia vaccines. The effectiveness of vaccinations depends in large part on a strong response to the vaccine by the immune system. Drugs that decrease immune system function therefore, may also decrease the effectiveness of vaccines. 2. How the Problem of Interest will be studied We plan to give three different groups of participants influenza vaccinations and measure each participant's immune system response through blood tests. The three groups will be: 1. Healthy people taking no immunosuppressive medications 2. Patients with skin conditions requiring treatment with azathioprine and currently taking no other immunosuppressive agents 3. Patients with psoriasis requiring treatment with TNF-alpha (tumor necrosis factor-alpha) and currently taking no other immunosuppressive medications. All participants will be between 18 - 89 years old and will not have had influenza vaccination within the previous six months. We will administer the vaccination on day 0. We will take blood samples on days 0, 7, and 28 following vaccination. We will use these blood samples to measure the amount of antibodies produced to the vaccine and the response of specific immune system cells known as B-lymphocytes. Using statistical methods, we will compare these findings between the three groups of participants to determine if differences in response to the vaccination exist. 3. How the research will advance scientific knowledge and/or human health To our knowledge there is no scientific data available regarding the effectiveness of vaccinations in patients receiving only one specific immunosuppressive medication. We will also be using new techniques developed at Emory to measure the B-lymphocyte response to the vaccine. This research could potentially help guide vaccination strategies for people requiring immunosuppressive medications and prevent infectious disease in these populations as well as the general population.

NCT ID: NCT01702207 Completed - Clinical trials for Cardiovascular Diseases

Evaluation Of Switching From Twice Daily Tacrolimus To Once Daily Formulation On Cardiovascular Risk

ESTTEROD
Start date: October 2012
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Current standard prophylactic immunosuppression in renal transplantation includes tacrolimus, a calcineurin inhibitor, dosed twice daily. In Canada, oral tacrolimus has been available as a twice daily formulation marketed as Prograf® since 1997. It has recently become available in an extended release formulation called Advagraf®, which is dosed once daily. Advagraf® has been demonstrated to be therapeutically equivalent to Prograf® in the renal transplant maintenance population, and as a result it has been is approved as an alternative to the twice daily formulation in these patients. There is an evolving and expanding positive clinical experience with Advagraf® in kidney transplantation and it has shown to be preferred by many patients, due to the diminished dosing frequency. In clinical trials, Advagraf® has been shown to have other potential benefits over Prograf® such as less inter and intra-patient variability, improved cardiovascular profiles, and improved kidney function. Compared to Prograf®, Advagraf® also has a lower Cmin or 'trough' concentration as well as a lower Cmax or 'peak' concentration. The purpose of this study is to convert stabilized renal transplant patients currently receiving Prograf® to Advagraf®, to investigate these potential therapeutic benefits. The Framingham Risk Score and the Reynold's Risk Score are currently recommended by the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) to predict 10-year cardiovascular risk in the general population. Surrogate markers are widely used in clinical trials to shorten follow-up durations. In this study, the investigators will use the Framingham Risk Score and Reynold's Risk Score to quantify changes in estimated cardiovascular risk. The investigators also intend to examine novel inflammatory markers to investigate cardiovascular risk. The investigators hypothesize that the more consistent drug exposure and lower Cmax noted with Advagraf® will decrease Framingham Risk Score, Reynolds Risk score as well as markers of inflammation in kidney transplant recipients.

NCT ID: NCT01678937 Completed - Immunosuppression Clinical Trials

Immune Tolerance and Alloreactivity in Liver Transplant Recipients on Different Monotherapy Immunosuppressive Agents

Start date: September 2007
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

This study is being done with the purpose of trying to understand if and why transplant recipients may develop tolerance to their transplanted organ. Tolerance means being able to lower or take away immunosuppression (anti-rejection medications) without causing organ rejection.

NCT ID: NCT01638559 Completed - Clinical trials for Liver Transplantation

Immunosuppression Withdrawal for Stable Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients

iWITH
Start date: August 14, 2012
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of immunosuppression withdrawal (ISW) in pediatric liver transplant (tx) recipients.

NCT ID: NCT01429844 Completed - Immunosuppression Clinical Trials

Tacrolimus Versus Cyclosporine for Immunosuppression After Lung Transplantation

EAILTX
Start date: January 2001
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of the study is to compare efficacy and safety of two different immunosuppressive regimens for prevention of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) (chronic lung allograft rejection)after lung transplantation: tacrolimus versus cyclosporine, both in combination with mycophenolate mofetil and steroids. The study was powered to detect a 15% reduction in BOS in tacrolimus treated patients. Study design: open-label, randomized, comparative, multi-center, investigator driven

NCT ID: NCT01281995 Completed - Healthy Clinical Trials

Effects of Systemically Administered Hydrocortisone on the Immune System in Healthy Volunteers

Start date: January 21, 2011
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Background: - Corticosteroids have been used to treat inflammation and immune system diseases for decades. However, despite their widespread use, there is little information on the specifics of how corticosteroids affect the immune system in humans. The Center for Human Immunology, Autoimmunity, and Inflammatory Diseases is interested in studying how the steroid hormone hydrocortisone affects the immune system in healthy volunteers, and in doing so to understand how hydrocortisone given at different doses works in treating many immune and inflammatory conditions. Objectives: - To evaluate the effects of hydrocortisone on the immune and inflammatory responses of healthy volunteers over the short and intermediate term (up to 28 days after administration). Eligibility: - Healthy volunteers at least 18 years of age. Design: - Participants will be screened with a full medical history and physical examination, and blood and urine tests. At this visit, participants will be separated into two groups, with each group scheduled to receive a different amount of hydrocortisone during the study visit. - One week before the study visit, participants will provide a blood sample for baseline testing. - Participants will be admitted for a 24-hour inpatient stay that will involve frequent blood draws. Between blood draws, participants will be able to work, watch TV, walk around, and so on, and will be provided with regular meals. - Blood will be drawn 1 hour before the infusion of hydrocortisone. Participants will be divided into two further sets of groups with different blood draw schedules: - Groups 1 (lower dose) and 2 (higher dose) will have blood draws 1, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours after the hydrocortisone infusion. - Groups 3 (lower dose) and 4 (higher dose) will have multiple blood draws over 24 hours, with timing based on data from the previous groups blood test results. - Participants will provide additional blood samples 7 and 28 days after the in-patient visit....

NCT ID: NCT01252537 Completed - Tuberculosis Clinical Trials

Immunosuppression in HIV-infected Patients With Tuberculosis in Ethiopia

Start date: September 2010
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) and HIV are leading causes of disease and death in Subsaharan Africa. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) dramatically improves prognosis in HIV infection, but TB is still a common complication in HIV-infected subjects. Management of TB-HIV co-infection is complex, both with regard to diagnosis and treatment. Since scaling-up of ART requires management of most patients in primary health care, it is critical to achieve better strategies for TB-HIV co-infection at peripheral levels of the health care system in endemic regions. This includes development of new methods to assess the severity of HIV disease and the need to start ART during TB treatment in this population. Aims: To compare a scoring system for clinical signs of immunosuppression with CD4 cell counts to assess HIV disease severity and indications for ART initiation, and to correlate immunosuppression status with treatment outcome. Workplan: CD4 cell levels and results of clinical scoring has been compared in 1100 patients with TB, using HIV-negative subjects with TB treatment for control. Inclusion was closed in February 2012, and follow-up of participants completed in August 2012. Plasma levels of immune activation and inflammatory markers will be correlated with the degree of immunosuppression. Significance: TB is the most significant clinical challenge to the successful scaling-up of ART in Africa. In order to improve management in primary health care it is necessary to find robust and reliable techniques for determining disease severity and identification of patients who need to start ART during TB treatment. This study may contribute to increased knowledge in this field and help to modify guidelines for management of TB-HIV co-infection in Ethiopia as well as in other resource-limited settings.