View clinical trials related to Immunosuppression.
Filter by:World Health Organization considers non-adherence has a strong negative impact on the health of patients with chronic diseases. In transplantation, adherence to immunosuppressive drug regimens associates with late rejection and graft loss making it a critical determinant of patient outcome. The prevalence of non-adherence in transplant patients, including liver transplant patients, can be as high as 40%. Among others, life-long intake and complexity of immunosuppressive regimen make patients prone to non-adherence. For instance, non-adherence is more prevalent among patients with higher numbers of immunosuppressive drugs. One of the most commonly cited causes of non-adherence is forgetfulness and disruptions in routine, with the evening dose of twice daily regimens being the most likely to be affected6. Besides non-adherence, the constraints generated in everyday life by immunosuppression (including timely and regular drug intake) and the complexity of the immunosuppressive regimens represent a burden for the patients and are probably associated with a health-related quality of life deterioration. Therefore, long-term adherence and quality of life after liver transplantation might be improved by using a well-tolerated and easy-to-handle immunosuppressive regimen. The immunosuppressive regimen after liver transplantation is in most cases based on different combinations of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids. While corticosteroids are administered once daily, tacrolimus can be administered either twice-daily (BID) as an immediate-release, or once-daily (QD) as an extended-release formulation. Among once-daily tacrolimus formulations, LCP-tacrolimus (ENVARSUS XR®) is approved for the prevention of transplant rejection in adult liver allograft recipients. It has demonstrated similar outcomes compared to immediate-release tacrolimus BID, in both kidney and liver transplantation. Mycophenolate has only been approved for BID administration, preventing from taking all immunosuppressive drugs once daily. Yet, single daily dosing would probably contribute to better adherence and quality of life in patients receiving a life-long treatment. Although the half-life of mycophenolic acid (MPA), the active moiety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is compatible with once-daily administration, no published randomized clinical study has ever evaluated the efficacy and safety of MMF administered QD. The narrow therapeutic index and wide pharmacokinetic variability of tacrolimus and mycophenolate justify individual dose adjustment by means of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), in order to minimize the risk of acute rejection and the occurrence of adverse events. For tacrolimus, TDM is generally based on the trough concentration (C0) and sometimes on the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), while for mycophenolate it should be based on the AUC of MPA. However, the dose adjustment of MMF in liver transplant patients is most of the time performed a posteriori, based on clinical signs of inefficacy of toxicity. Limited sampling strategies with maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation have been developed by our team for both molecules in adult liver transplant patients to estimate their AUC, which is considered the best marker of exposure for both. Therefore, tacrolimus AUC0-24h can be estimated by Bayesian estimation using samples collected before administration (C0), 8 (C8h) and 12 (C12h) hours after the administration of ENVARSUS XR®, or 1 and 3 hours after the administration of PROGRAF® and ADVAGRAF®. For mycophenolate, the MPA AUC can be estimated using samples collected 20 min, 1 and 3 hours after MMF administration, by Bayesian estimation. Even if limited to 2 or 3 blood samples, tacrolimus TDM for ENVARSUS® requires late sampling (12h post-dose). To overcome the necessity of a longer hospital stay, microsampling devices (MSD) such as the Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS®) device (Mitra®) can be used by the patients to take samples themselves, at home. Moreover, they are less invasive than venipuncture and collect low but accurate volumes of blood for analysis. In this context, we propose a randomized controlled non-inferiority study to demonstrate that in liver transplant recipients, an immunosuppressive strategy based on single daily doses of LCP-tacrolimus (ENVARSUS XR®) and mycophenolate mofetil (CELLCEPT®) started at M6 post-transplantation is not inferior to XR-tacrolimus (ADVAGRAF®) and MMF administered BID, in terms of incidence of treatment failure (see below) at the end of the first year after transplantation, and to obtain adherence, quality of life and safety data. In order to compare solely MMF QD to MMF BID, patients on ENVARSUS XR® and MMF QD will be compared to a third group of patients receiving ENVARSUS XR® and MMF BID. A direct comparison of efficacy and safety, quality of life, adherence and exposure indices will be performed between ENVARSUS XR® and ADVAGRAF®.
The investigators will evaluate the immune response of immunocompromised adults, who have previously received at least 1 dose of 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine, to the booster series of 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine followed by 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine 8 weeks later. Immune response will be assessed by opsonophagocytic assay reactivity and IgG Geometric mean concentration changes.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare responses to Varicella Zoster vaccination between kidney transplant patients on different medication regimens, and their healthy co-habitants. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Are there differences in vaccination immunological responses in kidney transplant patients on different immunosuppression regimens? 2. Are there differences in vaccination immunological responses between kidney transplant patients and their healthy co-habitants? Participants will all receive a 2-dose course of SHINGRIX recombinant Zoster vaccination, and have immunological responses measured and compared at 5 timepoints between 1 week to 1 year post-vaccination.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about the efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive withdrawal in pediatric liver transplant recipients. The main question it aims to answer is:exploring the landscape of immune tolerance after pediatric liver transplantation. Moreover,this clinical trial aims to provide important foundation and clinical data for inducing immune tolerance, as well as to clarify the mechanism of immune tolerance development in pediatric liver transplantation, identify biomarkers that can be used to predict immune tolerance, and build a prediction model of immune tolerance after pediatric liver transplantation. The study planned to enroll 47 recipients after pediatric liver transplantation which would gradually withdrawal immunosuppressive after enrollment, divided the participants into immune tolerance and immune intolerance groups based on the outcome of immunosuppressive withdrawal.In this study, we collect the peripheral blood and liver biopsy samples from the two groups, find biomarkers with predictive value for immune tolerance in recipients after pediatric liver transplantation, and build a predictive model of immune tolerance by machine learning.
Immunotherapy have revolutionized the field of oncology, but response rates are low and all patients relapse, due to cellular and soluble immunosuppressive mechanisms. MDSC are one of the most important immunosuppressive cells, that also harbour non immunologic functions, favouring cancer invasion. These non immunologic functions of MDSC in lung cancer will be better characterized. Indeed, cellular mechanisms will be analysed by in vitro studies, assessing the effect of immunosuppressive cells, provided by fresh tumor samples, on phenotype and functions of lung cancer cell lines. The aim of this study is to better characterize immunosuppressive landscape of NSCLC and mechanisms involved in their protumor functions.
Phase III trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of a single high dose (10 mg/kg) of liposomal amphotericin B for disseminated histoplasmosis in AIDS patients, in comparison to standard therapy (3 mg/kg of liposomal amphotericin B for two weeks) (INDUCTION trial).
A key aspect of the trial is that functions of anti-neoplastic T cells and natural killer (NK) cells, may be inhibited by immunosuppressive signals from myeloid cells, in particular reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced by several subsets of myeloid cells. In cancer, such immunosuppressive cells are commonly denoted myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), which are immature monocytes and granulocytes that impede immune-mediated clearance of malignant cells by multiple mechanisms, including the formation of immunosuppressive ROS via myeloid cell NADPH oxidase (NOX2). The presence of MDSCs within or adjacent to tumor tissue is assumed to facilitate the growth and spread of tumors and may also dampen the efficacy of cancer immunotherapies. The underlying hypothesis for this clinical trial is the administration of HDC/IL-2 will reduce surgery-induced inflammation and reduce metastasis. A phase I/II open label, single-center study of the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of peri- and postoperative therapy with histamine dihydrochloride and low-dose interleukin-2 treatment in subjects with primary pancreatic cancer.To assess the frequency and extent of adverse events associated with low dose interleukin-2 and histamine dihydrochloride when used as perioperative therapy.To determine progression free survival and overall survival following surgery, and compare with matched historical controls from the Swedish Cancer Registry.
This project assesses feasibility of providing medically vulnerable rural patients with Medical-Self-Assessment-Boxes containing equipment to use at home during telephone and video consultations (telemedicine) with GPs and other healthcare professionals. COVID-19 has caused an upsurge in primary care telemedicine which the investigators believe can be sustained and optimized to make things better for medically vulnerable rural patients beyond the pandemic. The investigators will achieve this by equipping the participants to self-measure and report key clinical measurements (e.g. blood pressure, temperature, oxygen levels) during telemedicine consultations. Before conducting a major evaluation of the Medical-Self-Assessment-Box for medically vulnerable rural patients the investigators must establish three things: First, to show the investigators can issue a Medical-Self-Assessment-Box to medically vulnerable rural patients and enable them to use it properly. Second, to determine that patients can use the Medical-Self-Assessment-Box effectively during telemedicine consultations. Third, to show that it is possible to measure how well the Medical-Self-Assessment-Box is working by counting how often the boxes are being used and whether use is appropriate and helpful. The knowledge gained will provide the investigators with the information needed to develop a funding proposal to evaluate Medical-Self-Assessment-Boxes for medically vulnerable rural patients in the whole of the UK.
This is an unblinded, randomized, controlled, two-arm interventional research study enrolling patients who are undergoing heart transplantation. The aim of the study is to determine whether patients at low risk of rejection can safely reduce the doses of their post-transplant immunosuppression medications using a combination of tests that include donor-specific antibodies (DSA), histology (looking at tissue from the donor heart), donor-derived cell-free DNA (AlloSure), and gene expression profiling (AlloMap). Eligible participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio into the HeartCare immune-optimization (intervention) arm or the corresponding observational (control) arm. AlloSure and AlloMap are the components of the HeartCare panel developed by CareDx.
The BELASWITCH study is a prospective single-centre study including all kidney transplant patients for whom a conversion from Tacrolimus to Belatacept has been decided by the transplant clinicians of the Grenoble Alpes University Hospital. Each patient will be included at the time of conversion (patients stable on Tacrolimus for at least 6 months) and will be their own control 1 year after conversion to Belatacept. The study has two components: - A "Metabolic" benefit arm: the investigators assume that conversion from Tacrolimus to Belatacept reduces the risk of diabetes by reducing the level of insulin resistance. - An "Infectious" risk arm: measurement of the viral load of Torque Teno Virus to assess the state of immunosuppression of patients. In this sense, the investigators hypothesise that it could serve as a biomarker of immunodepression in this population.