View clinical trials related to Hyperthermia.
Filter by:With the increasing incidence and severity of extreme heat events accompanying climate change, there is an urgent need for sustainable cooling strategies to protect heat-vulnerable older adults, who are at increased risk of adverse health events during heat stress. Health agencies including the World Health Organization, the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Health Canada currently recommend visiting a cooling centre or other air-conditioned location for 1-3 hours per day during extreme heat events to mitigate hyperthermia and strain on the cardiovascular system and therefore the risk adverse health events. However, our recent trial shows that while brief air-conditioning exposure is effective for reducing body temperature and cardiovascular burden in healthy older adults, the physiological impacts of cooling abate quickly following return to the heat. The purpose of this project is therefore to assess whether shorter but more frequent air-conditioning exposure provides more effective cooling than current recommendations (a single 1-3-hour cooling bout) in older adults with or without common chronic health conditions associated with increased vulnerability to extreme heat. This will be accomplished by evaluating physiological strain in older adults with and without diabetes and/or hypertension exposed for 8 hours to conditions reflective of extreme heat events in temperate, continental climates (35°C, 60% relative humidity). Participants will complete 3 separate simulated heat event exposures: i) a control trial (no cooling throughout the 8-hour heat event); ii) a recommended cooling trial (3 hours of heat exposure followed by 2 hours cooling); and iii) a hybrid cooling trial (2 hours of heat exposure followed by 1 hour cooling, another 2 hours heat exposure followed by 1 hour cooling, and a final 2-hour heat exposure).
Treatment of patients with febrile neutropenia (FN) attending Emergency Departments (EDs) relies on rapid antibiotic initiation in order to control a presumed infection. The choice of initial antibiotics is empirical and depends on patient's prior colonization or infection by multi-drug resistant pathogens (MDRPs) and risk stratification. Stratification of high-risk patients needing broad-spectrum antibiotics is debated. Thus, for non-specialist physicians, this choice may be challenging, leading to inappropriate initial antimicrobial regimens, potential risks for the patient and higher costs. Furthermore, international guidelines recommended to develop antibiotic stewardship programs and promoted an initial strategy based on escalation or de-escalation approaches, with early reassessment depending on patients' clinical course and microbiological results. Nevertheless, this interesting strategy may increase the level of complexity for the choice of the initial antibiotic regimen by non-specialist emergency physicians who are often the first prescribers in this context. We developed an interactive computerized decision support app (CDSA) for initial antibiotic prescription and early revaluation in patients with FN. The first goal of this app is to assist non-specialized physicians in choosing initial antimicrobial regimen for patients with FN when they attend EDs. It uses an interactive algorithm based on international guidelines that takes into account patients' medical history and characteristics. Secondly, the app is also designed to propose an algorithm of antibiotic revaluation at day 3-4 for hospitalized patients, depending on patient clinical course, and biological and microbiological results. The revaluation suggests antimicrobial modification (escalation or de-escalation) or discontinuation and stopping rules with recommended duration of therapy also based on international guidelines. We hypothesize that such a CDSA may improve the adherence to guidelines for the choice of initial antibiotic regimen for FN in the ED, favour early antibiotic reassessment for hospitalized patients, both decreasing the risk of treatment failure.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether adding deep hyperthermia to neoadjuvant concurrent radiochemotherapy could improve T-downstaging rate for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).
This study investiagates deep-regional or superficial hyperthermia to enhance radiotherapy or chemoradiation in patients that suffer recurrent disease after previous radiotherapy.
This study is a prospective, randomized, comparative clinical trial conducted by Wuhan Union Hospital and aim to compare the therapeutic effects of Mitomycin and Lobaplatin in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer patients with radical surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy