Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05979142 |
Other study ID # |
1912252903 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
September 2011 |
Est. completion date |
May 2014 |
Study information
Verified date |
July 2023 |
Source |
Asociación Siempre Salud |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The goal of this observational study is to compare usual care to a community-based primary
care program (having components of treatment decisions based on clinical guidelines,
self-management education, community health workers, and free health care visits and
medications) in low-income Peruvians with type 2 diabetes and/or hypertension.
The main question[s] it aims to answer are:
- Compared to pre-program usual care, does the program result in greater benefits,
measured as greater proportions of patients with glucose and blood pressure control or
maximal quantities and doses of medications?
- Are there greater benefits when the program was provided at home compared to when the
program was provided in a clinic?
- Does longer participation in the program result in greater benefits?
Participants will participate in:
- Self-management education provided by community health workers.
- Monitoring of healthy behaviors and glucose, blood pressure, and weight.
- Receipt of free medications for blood pressure, glucose, and heart disease prevention.
Description:
A pre-post study of visit-level data gathered prospectively during a community-based primary
care program evaluated its effects on pharmacotherapy of type 2 diabetes and hypertension.
The program was conducted by AsociaciĆ³n Siempre Salud, a Peruvian non-profit organization, in
three neighborhoods ("the community") in Pueblo Nuevo, Chincha District, Peru. Door-to-door
surveys identified all persons residing in the study community. Persons > 35 years old were
eligible, without exclusions, to participate in type 2 diabetes and hypertension screening
and diagnosis. Most participated in mass screenings between September and December 2011,
others in later ad hoc screenings. Patients with negative screening results on medications
were re-screened following medication withdrawal. Those with confirmed diagnoses were
eligible to participate in the program.
Three binary exposures were evaluated for their effects on adherence to four treatment
standards and one composite standard: 1) 'program exposure' (post- vs. pre-exposure); 2)
'program retention in care' (>50% of allowable time in both home and clinic care periods,
compared to <50% in either care period (but not both)), and 3) 'care period', (clinic
compared to home care). 'Care period treatment time' (>50% of allowable time versus less) was
evaluated as an independent variable in the study of the care period exposure.
During the pre-exposure period, usual care was provided by two public hospitals, several
Ministry of Health clinics, private clinics and pharmacies, and Siempre Salud. The program,
to which patients were then exposed, had components of four CCM elements (delivery system
design, self-management, decision support, and community resources), CHWs, and no
out-of-pocket costs for visits and medications. Self-management was based on national
standards and utilized educational materials from professional societies and government
agencies in the USA. Decision support consisted of guidelines-based standards adapted to our
low-resource setting and simplified medication treatment protocols for diabetes,
hypertension, and primary prevention of CVD. The delivery system consisted of two care models
employed sequentially: first home care, then clinic care (see care period exposure).
During the home care period, the physician made an initial visit, after which CHWs made
weekly visits to patients' homes. CHWs monitored clinical parameters, provided
self-management education and support, tracked self-care behaviors, documented visits, acted
on clinical alerts, and delivered medications. They entered encounter data into a spreadsheet
and filled prescriptions under physician supervision. The physician made treatment decisions
reliant on home visit data and patient care conferences. During the subsequent clinic period,
patients made monthly visits to the clinic physician who provided all care.