Lopinavir/r Monotherapy Versus Abacavir/Lamivudine and Lopinavir/r for Limb Fat Recovery in Persons With Lipoatrophy

HIV Infections Clinical Trial

— KRETA  

Official title:

A Phase IV-III Comparative, Randomized, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy for the Recovery of Peripheral Fat (or of the Extremities) of Lopinavir/Ritonavir in Monotherapy Versus Abacavir/Lamivudine and Lopinavir/Ritonavir

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT00865007
• Other study ID #: GESIDA-6008
• Secondary ID: 2008-003748-12
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 4
• First received: March 18, 2009
• Last updated: March 21, 2013
• Start date: December 2008
• Est. completion date: September 2012

Study information

• Verified date: March 2013
• Source: Fundacion SEIMC-GESIDA
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: Spain: Spanish Agency of Medicines
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy for the recovery of peripheral fat of lopinavir/ritonavir in monotherapy versus abacavir/lamivudine and lopinavir/ritonavir in subjects who developed lipoatrophy while receiving zidovudine plus lamivudine plus abacavir.

Description:

After more than ten years since it was started, it has already been established that highly-active antiretroviral treatment (HAART) has caused a dramatic reduction in the morbidity and mortality of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. However, HAART is not exempt of limitations, namely, its toxicity in the long-term; this is of special importance now that treatment of HIV is chronic.

Most common HAART involves the use of two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (nucleoside or nucleotide analogues, NRTIs) and either a protease inhibitor (PI) or a non-analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI). However, there are other regimens that remove some of these families, such as those based on three NRTIs, ZDV+3TC+ABC.

HAART has been associated with a constellation of major metabolic adverse events, such as fat redistribution (lipodystrophy, lipoatrophy, lipohypertrophy-central obesity - or both) and hyperlipidemia (hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia).

Lipoatrophy, specifically, occurs as a loss of subcutaneous fat mass in the upper and lower extremities, with the possible appearance of venomegaly in face and buttocks Lipoatrophy is particularly distressing not only for itself, but for its stigma component, affecting the quality of life and the psychological condition of the patient.This also has a direct impact on treatment compliance, that is reduced, and, therefore, at risk that the therapeutic regimen fails to be effective for resistances selection.

Although initially most metabolic adverse events were attributed to PIs, in recent years it has been shown that lipoatrophy specifically is related more to therapy with NRTIs than with PIs; specifically, d4T, ddI and ZDV.

One of the accepted strategies for the management of lipoatrophy in patients receiving therapy with ZDV is its replacement by other NRTI such as TDF or ABC, and consequently, a significant fat recovery is seen.

In a study where therapy with ZDV was discontinued and continued with NNRTIs (lopinavir/ritonavir-LPV/r and nevirapine-NVP) therapy, fat recovery in the extremities seemed to be higher than in patients where ZDV was replaced by ABC.

Lopinavir (ABT-378) is a potent protease inhibitor of HIV. The proven efficacy and safety of LPV/r-based HAART has led to its inclusion since 2003 in therapeutic guidelines as therapy of preferential start PI/r based.

With regard to its relationship with lipoatrophy, recent data have shown that LPV/r has a low risk induction profile.

In recent years data have been published on the use of LPV/r monotherapy: starting, and induction-maintenance after therapy with HAART with sustained undetectability for at least 6 months.

Given the aforementioned data, in those patients developing lipoatrophy while treated with ZDV+ABC+3TC, the approach of switching to a regimen in the absence of LPV/r-based nucleosides could be even more beneficial than just removing ZDV and maintaining them on a HAART containing LPV/r+ABC+3TC. Despite the fact that lipoatrophy associated with ABC/3TC is very low in treatment-naive patients, it has yet to be demonstrated that discontinuing even "benign" nucleosides could provide an additional benefit in patients that had already developed lipoatrophy.

Accordingly, the working hypothesis for this study would be as follows: the recovery or reversion of lipoatrophy would increase in patients receiving LPV/r in monotherapy vs those switching to a classic LPV/r-based HAART. The absence of any nucleoside would then be beneficial for fat recovery in the extremities.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 88
• Est. completion date: September 2012
• Est. primary completion date: June 2012
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Confirmation of the willingness of the patient to participate in this study after being informed on all the aspects of the trial that may influence their decision, signing and dating the written informed consent form approved by the Ethics Committee.

• The patient is 18 years of age or older.

• (Documented) HIV-1 infection.

• Receiving treatment with ZDV+3TC+ABC (in continuous antiretroviral treatment, without discontinuation periods, for the past 6 months).

• There is confirmation that during the 6 months prior to inclusion in the study the viral burdens were below 50 copies/mL.

• A viral burden below 50 copies/mL no more than 30 days before starting the study.

• No previous history of virological failure while on antiretroviral treatment with protease inhibitors (PIs). That is, they have never switched protease inhibitors for suspected or documented virological failure. The changes in protease inhibitor due solely to toxicity, simplification or optimization are acceptable.

• Clinical evidence of moderate to severe lipoatrophy (according to the case definition as scoring >- 2. For inclusion in the study, the subject should have moderate to severe lipoatrophy in at least one site, and defined by the physician.

• Absence of signs of acute disease.

• Patient has not been treated for an active opportunistic infection within the 30 days prior to the baseline visit.

• Patient with Karnofsky index >- 70.

• During the study, the patient does not require and agrees not to take any of the following drugs that are contraindicated with LPV/r: astemizole, terfenadine, midazolam, triazolam, cisapride, certain ergot derivatives (ergotamine, dihydroergotamine, ergonovine, methylergonovine), pimozide, propafenone, and flecainide. Rifampin, a potent enzyme inducer, should not be administered with the study medication due to the possibility of a significant decrease in LPV/r concentrations during concomitant administration, nor drugs contraindicated with 3TC and ABC that in principle should not be being taken, as they are part of the treatment at the screening.

• Patient agrees not to take any medication, including over-the-counter medicines, alcohol, drugs, or herbal preparations without the knowledge and approval of the principal investigator.

• Laboratory tests have been performed on the patients in the past 30 days:

• G/dL hemoglobin >8.0

• Absolute neutrophil count 750 cells/microl

• Platelet count 20,000/microl

• ALT or AST <5 x upper normal limit (UNL)

• Creatinine <1. 5 x UNL

• Triglycerides <750 mg/dL.

• For women, a negative result of a pregnancy test is available and they agree to use throughout the study a barrier contraceptive method of proven reliability in the investigator's opinion.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients with a history of virological failure on treatment with PIs; that is, that they have at some point switched to PIs for confirmed or documented virological failure.

• Patients with positive serum hepatitis B surface antigen.

• Patients requiring treatment with drugs where combination with LPV/r is contraindicated.

• Presence of active opportunistic disease or wasting syndrome or under antitumoral treatment with chemotherapy.

• Patients treated in the previous 16 weeks with agents susceptible to insulin (glitazones or metformin), anabolic steroids, growth hormone or any agent that could interfere with the study drugs.

• Active drug addiction or psychiatric disease that may prevent protocol compliance. Use of cannabis or being on methadone treatment are excepted, provided protocol compliance is not compromised in the investigator's opinion.

• Pregnant women or nursing mothers, and women of childbearing age if they do not agree to use a barrier contraceptive method throughout the study of proven reliability in the investigator's opinion.

• In the opinion of the principal investigator, the patient is unlikely to comply with the study protocol, or the patient is not eligible for any other reason.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Prevention

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
• HIV Infection
• HIV Infections
• Infection
• Lipodystrophy

Intervention

Drug:
• Monotherapy (Lopinavir/ritonavir)
NRTI sparing
• Monotherapy (Lopinavir/ritonavir) + ABC/3TC
NRTI sparing regimen

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Spain	Hospital General Universitario de Alicante	Alicante
Spain	Hospital Clinico y Provincial	Barcelona
Spain	Hospital Sant Creu i Sant Pau	Barcelona
Spain	Hospital de Basurto	Bilbao	Vizcaya
Spain	Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia	Cordoba
Spain	Hospital de Donostia	Donostia	San Sebastian
Spain	Hospital Severo Ochoa	Leganes	Madrid
Spain	Hospital Doce de Octubre	Madrid
Spain	Hospital La Paz	Madrid
Spain	Hospital La Paz	Madrid
Spain	Hospital Xeral Cies	Vigo	Pontevedra

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Fundacion SEIMC-GESIDA	Abbott

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Spain, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Absolute change in limb fat measured by DEXA at 48w		48 weeks	Yes
Secondary	Absolute change in limb-fat measured by DEXA at 96 weeks		96 weeks	Yes
Secondary	Lipid changes at Week 24, 48, 72 and 96		96 weeks	Yes