View clinical trials related to Hernia Incisional.
Filter by:This study compares short term outcomes of patients undergoing a hernia repair with heavy weight mesh vs medium weight mesh in clean-contaminated and contaminated cases.
In the latest guidelines for abdominal wall closure in emergency surgery published in the World Journal of Emergency Surgery (WJES) in 2023, no specific recommendations are made in this regard. Current literature does not provide any articles comparing these two types of mesh materials (PP vs PVDF) in emergency colorectal surgery. It is necessary to conduct a study comparing these two types of mesh materials, specifically in high-risk patients for incisional hernia and emergency colorectal surgery. This study aims to contribute to generating evidence regarding differences in wound infection incidence and potential subsequent complications, such as chronic pain. It is essential to conduct a study comparing different methods of laparotomy closure, specifically in emergency colorectal surgery, to contribute valuable evidence regarding the incidence of incisional hernia and potential subsequent complications.
This multicenter retrospective study analyzed data from 308 patients who underwent open Posterior Component separation with Trasversus release for primary or recurrent complex abdominal hernias between 2015 and 2020. The primary endpoint was the rate of Hernia Recurrence and Mesh Bulging at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. Secondary outcomes included surgical site events and were assessed using the Pain scale.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of using polypropylene mesh for hernia prevention after stoma closure in patients with colorectal cancer and non-mesh repair. The main question it aims to answer is: can mesh help prevent hernia? Participants will be divided into 2 groups: with and without mesh using. They must be followed up for 2 years after enrollment in the study. Researchers will compare mesh and non-mesh groups to evaluate the benefits and harms of mesh using in hernia prevention.
The use of laparoscopy and the ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) perioperative pathways are well defined in surgery and widely used worldwide. Predicting the success or failure of ERAS has become a matter of interest, as there is evidence confirming that greater compliance with the items of ERAS improves clinical outcomes. However, the impact that every single item of ERAS programs may have on postoperative recovery remains unknown. Furthermore, the loss of conformity, or deviation from the pathway, is multifactorial and derives from different issues (organizational, cultural, etc.). While data are available on the compliance of surgeons to ERAS pathways, it is impossible to establish which item is related to the benefits induced by ERAS. Regarding abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) surgery, there is no uniform adherence to the ERAS protocol, often creating confusion about the effectiveness of the protocol itself. The goal of this multicenter, prospective, international, observational study is to prospectively assess adherence to the ERAS protocol in AWR surgery and its effectiveness in patients undergoing elective surgery for ventral primary/incisional hernias. The participating centers will consecutively enroll all patient candidates for an elective ventral or incisional hernia repair (open/laparoscopic/robotic/converted technique). The present study will include all patients ≥18 years old, capable of expressing valid informed consent, with a ventral/incisional hernia diagnosis confirmed by CT/US scan, who will undergo elective surgery. For each patient, anthropometric and personal data (sex, age, BMI) and data relating to their health state (ASA Score, previous abdominal surgery, hernia site) will be collected. Intraoperative data will include the type of surgery and intraoperative complications. Data regarding the adherence/lack of adherence to each item of the ERAS protocol will be collected, and, in the case of non-adherence, the reason will be specified, choosing between "habit", "disagreement", and "lack of organizational pathway", "other". During the post-operative period, all data regarding functional recovery will be recorded, i.e. the day of removal of the drainage, mobilization, return to bowel function, post-operative pain at first and third post-operative day and discharge, and length of hospitalization. Moreover, for each patient, data regarding post-operative complications will be collected and stratified by severity according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. This research is observational; therefore, no interventional changes should be made to the daily clinical practice at each participating center. Patients <18 years old, patients unable to provide valid informed consent, and those who refuse to be included in the study will be excluded. The study's primary objective is to evaluate adherence to the different items of the ERAS protocol for AWR surgery. The study's secondary objective is to evaluate which item of the protocol can affect the post-operative recovery of patients undergoing AWR surgery. The study's primary outcome is the compliance rate for each ERAS item for AWR surgery. The secondary outcomes of the study are the evaluation of complications, length of hospital stay, and recovery time after AWR in relation to compliance with the ERAS items. In addition, the study will evaluate: the time to removal of the drainage tube, if placed (post-operative day, n.), post-operative mobilization (hours, n.), time to resumption of post-operative liquid diet after surgery (hours, n.), time to resumption of liquid diet after surgery (hours, n.), pain at I-II-III post-operative day (VAS Score), time to return to bowel function (gas) (hours, n.), time to return to bowel function (stools) (hours, n.), length of hospital stay (days, n), pain at discharge (VAS Score), post-operative complications (n, within 30 days), type of complication (if any). The complications will be classified according to Clavien-Dindo: Grade I complication according to Clavien-Dindo. Statistical analyses will be performed with the SPSS 27 system (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Continuous data will be expressed as mean ± SD; categorical variables will be expressed as percentages. To compare continuous variables, an independent sample t-test will be implemented. The Wilcoxon Paired-Samples Test will be used as a non-parametric test similar to the paired-samples t-test used for continuous variables. The Chi-square test (or Fisher's exact test where appropriate) will be used to analyze categorical data. The results will be presented as 2-tailed values with statistical significance if p< 0.05. To adjust all other variables and make predictions, multivariate analyses will be performed with operative time or post-operative time or the occurrence of post-operative complications as dependent variables and with significant clinical and demographic characteristics as independent variables.
A prospective randomized study was performed including consecutive patients who underwent an elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for symptomatic cholelithiasis during the 18 months period. This prospective randomized trial aims to compare two umbilical closure techniques for trocar site hernia (TSH) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
The SYN 20-01 Study is a non-interventional, prospective, multicenter, multicohort, international, post-market clinical investigation looking into the assessment of GORE® SYNECOR Biomaterial in focused patient populations and in long-term application. Patients with ventral / incisional hernia amenable to hernia mesh repair will be enrolled into two cohorts (US and EU cohort) and followed-up over the period of 60 months.
Today, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become the most frequently performed bariatric surgical method. One of the complications seen after LSG is trocar site hernia (TSH). There is no clear information about the rate of TSH detected radiologically after LSG. Thick abdominal wall and failure to adequately expose the facial defect related to this, mobility limitations due to excessive subcutaneous fatty tissue are the reasons accused for increased incidence of TSH. Demographic characteristics and postoperative weight loss of patients who underwent LSG procedure in our clinic between January 2015 and June 2017 and whose facial defects in the trocar region were repaired with the Carter-Thomason Suture Passer (CTSP) were evaluated. TSH evaluation was made both by physical examination and superficial USG by a general surgeon who had radiological training on concurrent superficial abdominal ultrasonography (USG). Detected TSHs were divided into two groups as symptomatic and asymptomatic.
This trial was designed as a prospective randomized, controlled, intervention, with two parallel groups, and a primary endpoint of recurrence during 12 months' follow-up after initial treatment, with the randomization, was performed by an online software a 1:1 allocation.
The proposed project aims to evaluate the safety of DuraMesh™ suture for laparotomy closure in an emergent setting, while also providing preliminary efficacy data with regard to incisional hernia prevention. Conventional techniques for laparotomy closure in the setting of an emergency laparotomy or delayed abdominal closure suffer from a lack of durability, with incisional hernia rates of 30-34% reported. While prophylactic planar mesh placement has emerged as a cost-effective strategy to prevent hernia formation in the clean, elective laparotomy setting, higher rates of surgical site complications and increased technical complexity preclude its use in the emergency or contaminated setting. Utilized exactly like conventional suture without any change in surgical closure technique, DuraMesh™ provides the durability of planar mesh reinforcement without the marked increase in foreign material or added surgical complexity. As a result, DuraMesh™ is the only hernia prevention strategy that can be forward-deployed in support of the injured warfighter. While this study is specifically targeted to a gap in the care of the injured warfighter, the potential benefits extend well beyond the military applications. With over 2 million laparotomies performed annually in the United States, and approximately 20% of these resulting in an incisional hernia, the need for an alternative abdominal wall closure strategy is equally dire in the civilian setting. This clinical trial represents an opportunity to drive the needed paradigm shift towards prevention, rather than costly management of incisional hernias. The investigators anticipate this work will rapidly lead to further research, including providing the preliminary data necessary to launch a multi-center randomized controlled trial to assess the clinical efficacy of DuraMesh™ for hernia prevention in both the emergent and elective operative settings.