View clinical trials related to Heart Diseases.
Filter by:The present study is testing spermidine treatment in elderly patients with coronary artery disease. The study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-armed, parallel-group, single centre, clinical study.
Prospectively measure impedance during cardiac catheterization to build a cardiac output algorithm.
The utility of Ultra High-Resolution Computed Tomography (UHR-CT) compared to conventional CT in all-comers (i.e., a generally lower-risk population) remains uncertain but is an important area of study in order to justify wider spread implementation and use of this technology, particularly in light of reports of significantly higher radiation exposure with UHR-CT, as well as longer scan times. The availability of technology to reconstruct conventional resolution (CR) simulation images from the raw CT acquisition data acquired on the UHR-CT scanner offers a unique platform to study this question without subjecting individuals to two different scans. The primary objective of this study is to generate preliminary data in support of the hypothesis that noninvasive UHR-CT is superior to conventional resolution CT for identifying patients with obstructive CHD.
The aim of this observational study is to compare the prognostic outcomes of various PCI strategies in elderly patients with complex coronary calcified lesions. The patients will be classified into two groups and assigned different PCI strategies, either stenting or stenting combined with pharmacologic balloon implantation. The investigators will assess the one-year prognosis for major adverse cardiovascular events in these patients.
Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has gradually become the technique of choice for continuous functional examination of the heart despite the significant training required for its interpretation. It has proven to be the safest, fastest, and most reliable technique for diagnosing most intra- and postoperative hemodynamic problems. Indeed, the transesophageal route is particularly well adapted to the situation of intubated patients, whether in the operating room, in the outpatient department or in intensive care. It offers images that are easier to obtain and of better quality than the transthoracic route; it can be performed without interfering with surgical activity or resuscitation. However, TEE training is often poor during the DES training in anesthesia and resuscitation, reserved for the few interns who will learn in a specific department where TEE is used on a daily basis. Thus, simulation is a logical and recognized means by which technical aspects, mechanisms involved in the understanding of a situation, reasoning and decision making can be analyzed and improved. The RFE SFAR 2019 recommendations suggest the use of simulation for the learning of technical gestures in initial training in order to improve their acquisition. This study is therefore part of a technical and diagnostic improvement of a practice, which appears to be essential in several fields in anesthesia and intensive care, for a technique still not sufficiently acquired by many future practitioners.
The objective of this study is to investigate the incidence of death and early postoperative complications, identify potential risk factors, and examine the demographic characteristics of patients and epidemiology of cardiovascular procedures. Our hypothesis is that gaining a more comprehensive understanding of the characteristics of patients who undergo cardiac surgery has the potential to improve outcomes for this patient profile. Thus, information was sought regarding the patient characteristics, surgeries performed, anesthesia administered, incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications, and risk factors associated with complication and mortality in the ICU. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Incidence of mortality or severe postoperative complications that occur within the first 3 postoperative days or until discharge from the ICU. - Risk factors associated with severe complications in patients who undergo cardiac surgery. - Characteristics of patients, anesthesia and surgical procedures performed - Incidence of severe intraoperative complications and moderate postoperative complications - Evaluate the influence of accumulated fluid balance on outcomes, mortality, and length of ICU stay. - Evaluate mortality in the ICU. - Describe the risk factors associated with mortality.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare 2 different timepoints for clamping the umbilical cord at birth for term-born infants with a prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease (CHD). The main questions it aims to answer are: - Does Delayed Cord Clamping at 120 seconds (DCC-120) or Delayed Cord Clamping at 30 seconds (DCC-30) after birth lead to better health outcomes? - Does DCC-120 seconds or DCC-30 seconds after birth lead to better neuromotor outcomes at 22-26 months of infant age (postnatal)? Participants will be asked to do the following: - Participate in either DCC-120 or DCC-30 at birth (randomized assignment). - Complete General Movements Assessment (GMA) at 3-4 months of infant age (postnatal), complete questionnaires / surveys at this time. - Complete questionnaires / surveys at 9-12 months of infant age (postnatal). - Complete Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE), Developmental Assessment of Young Children 2 Edition (DAYC-2), and questionnaires / surveys at 22-26 months of infant age (postnatal). - Permit data collection from electronic medical records for both the mother and infant study participants. Investigators will compare DCC-120 vs. DCC-30 to see which approach is more beneficial to both the mother and baby with CHD.
This pilot study uses a state-of-the-science combination of remote behavioral monitoring, real-time experience sampling, in-lab physiological assessments, and extraction of neighborhood-level characteristics to (1) Examine the impact of daily experience (i.e., racial discrimination, affective states, stress) on health behaviors (i.e., physical activity, sedentary behavior, sleep) at the intrapersonal level among Black women; (2) Test the association between daily behaviors and impairments in biomarkers associated with vascular function/health (i.e., augmented systemic inflammation and oxidative stress, impaired peripheral/cerebral vascular function, increased large artery stiffness), as well as the impact of daily experience on the relationship between behaviors and vascular function; and (3) Explore the influence of neighborhood-level characteristics (i.e., social environment factors: i.e., neighborhood income and poverty, racial composition; and built environment context, such as park density and walkability) on daily experience and health behaviors.
Heart failure in adults with congenital heart disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Patients with systemic right ventricle (SRV) and single ventricle (SV) are particularly at risk1, 2, 3. There are no specific recommendations for the management of heart failure in adults with congenital heart disease, whose management is based on "general cardiology" recommendations4,5. Sacubitril/Valsartan is validated as a treatment for heart failure in adults with acquired pathological left ventricular dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40%, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II and III despite optimal heart failure therapy)7. Although this molecule is used in current practice in patients with congenital heart disease, published data are limited 6-10. The aim of our work is to describe the efficacy and tolerability of Sacubitril/Valsartan in the treatment of chronic heart failure on VDS and VU through an observational, prospective, multicenter registry. The latest heart failure treatment guidelines, updated in 202111, recommend the addition of type 2 sodium-glucose co-transport inhibitors in heart failure patients with impaired ejection fraction (class IA recommendation). Two molecules are used in current practice: dapagliflozin and empagliflozin, at a single dosage of 10 mg/day. We will also be collecting data on the efficacy and safety of iSGLT2. It should be noted that, for practical reasons, there may be a delay between the end of the 1st study period (ISACC1) of one year and the start of the 2nd study period (ISACC2). Follow-up examinations carried out during the study period will not differ from those currently recommended in current practice5.
Non-significant risk device study to conduct evaluation of the performance of new device for monitoring of cardiac function (based on previous iterations 510(k) 173156)