View clinical trials related to Gingival Recession.
Filter by:The aim of this study was to treat the areas with Miller Class I bilateral multiple gingival recession in the maxillary teeth using the Titanium Platelet-Rich Fibrin (T-PRF), an autogenous biomaterial applied in combination with a Modified Coronally Positioned Flap (MCPF) prepared using microsurgical techniques, and the gold standard Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft (SCTG), to evaluate the efficacy of the treatments and to compare the clinical results 6 months after the treatment.
This is a split-mouth, randomized, controlled clinical trial that aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) membranes in conjunction with coronally advanced flap (CAF) in treating maxillary gingival recession defects.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of concentrated-growth-factor (CGF) in combination with coronally-advanced-flap (CAF) compared with platelet-rich-fibrin (PRF)+CAF for the treatment of localized gingival-recessions (GRs)
The study aims at determining the prevalence of non carious cervical lesions in patients with gingival recession in Egyptian population and associated risk factors including gingival biotype, keratinized tissue width, gingival index, plaque index, occlusal wear grade, sensitivity. and a questionnaire will be filled by patients with another risk factors including age, gender, toothbrush frequency and type, bruxism, gastric reflux, soft drinks, alcohol and citrus fruits. Also OHIP-14 will be answered in a questionnaire form by patients.
Many studies have compared the tunnel technique and coronally advanced flap in the treatment of single and multiple recessions. However, there is a lack of evidence that compared both techniques in combination with a connective tissue graft, for just multiple adjacent recessions. No technique is clearly superior to another in terms of complete root coverage (CRC), mean root coverage (MRC) and the gain of keratinized tissue height (KTH) when multiple recession coverage was evaluated. Moreover, as a connective tissue graft supposed to offer more stability in terms of complete root coverage in long-term basis, the main question should be aimed at the role of the sub-epithelial connective tissue graft, when it is used in combination with one technique or another. Hence, the hypothesis is focused on if the use of a connective tissue graft in combination with a tunnel technique would provide higher clinical outcomes and similar patient-based outcomes than its use in combination with the Coronally Advanced flap technique.
In this study, the conventional SDG method applied to increase the adherent gingival band and partial de-epithelialized SDG methods were evaluated in terms of aesthetics and color compatibility of the recipient area with adjacent tissues. This study is a controlled double-blind clinical trial randomized by split-mouth, envelope method.Clinical parameters and aesthetic harmony were compared at postoperative 1st, 3rd and 6th months after surgical procedures.Color harmony evaluation was made in 2 different ways, both by photo analysis of a blind researcher using computer software and by visual evaluation of the same blind researcher.
Coronally the advanced flap is considered a predictable treatment of gingival recession but in certain situations, it needs a filler like subperiosteal connective tissue graft (CTG) which is considered as the gold standard treatment approach. This randomized controlled trial compares the clinical benefits and effectiveness of a xenogenic collagen matrix (mucoderm, botiss, dental, Berlin, Germany) as a filler to the subperiosteal connective tissue graft (CTG).
The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of platelet- rich fibrin and coronally advanced flap technique in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions in comparison with connective tissue graft technique.
Present study aims to reveal the effects of cyanoacrylate application at the recipient bed and the donor site in free gingival graft surgery on the healing parameters and patient-based outcomes.
Compare between Buccal fat pad and subepithelial connective tissue graft in treatment of localized recession. Primary objective: to evaluate root coverage in terms of gingival thickness and esthetic. Secondary objective: to evaluate patient satisfaction and postoperative pain.