View clinical trials related to Gastrostomy.
Filter by:This study aims to evaluate the nutritional status of morbidly obese patients following gastric bypass surgery. Data from 76 patients aged 19-64, who will be monitored by a dietitian for at least six months, will be analyzed. Preoperative and postoperative biochemical parameters along with anthropometric measurements will assess.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the therapeutic effect of High intensity focused ultrasound in treatment of abdominal skin laxity post sleeve gastrectomy.
The purpose of this study is to assess the degree of sarcopenia by CT and to analyze its association with morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy and / or total gastrectomy. It is also intended to analyze the association between the degree of the CT-guided sarcopenia and the nutritional status of the patients evaluated by clinical parameters, both preoperative and postoperative. Besides that, to verify the association between the degree of sarcopenia and body fat rate.
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is currently the chosen minimally invasive, endoscopic procedure for medium- and long-term enteral feeding in cases who need palliative care. The presented study evaluated geriatric (> 65-year-old) PEG-applied patients at our institution.
The application of PEG in geriatric-palliative care has not been well discussed. With the development of endoscopic procedures and PEG devices, we can perform this minimally invasive method more safely, even in challenging cases. We should discuss the indications of PEG in the field of palliative care of geriatric patients. The presented study evaluated geriatric (> 65-year-old) palliative care patients to whom PEG applied at our institution.
Patients who were pathologically diagnosed with gastric cancer and underwent distal gastrectomy with R-Y reconstruction between March 2014 and March 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The occurrence of RSS was evaluated and examined for correlations with demographic and clinicopathological data. "R" package was used to build a nomogram.
The purpose of this study is to assess the problems and a range of nutritional and clinical outcomes that occur with two feeding tubes used by children having a bone marrow transplant. Children and parents will also be interviewed to ask about their experiences of tube feeding.
A study to explore the relationship between early weight loss in the 4 weeks following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and outcomes, in terms of weight loss and comorbidity improvement, 7 years following the surgery.
The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of total intravenous and inhalation anesthesia on the damage of endothelial glucocorticoids by comparing the concentration of syndecan-1 before and after laparoscopic or robotic assisted gastrectomy.
Placement of a feeding tube through a gastrostomy can be performed endoscopically or radiologically. While percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement is most frequently performed using a "pull" technique, this method may not feasible in patients with malignant, or tight benign, esophageal stenosis. Further, the "pull" technique may drag tumor cells with the feeding tube and lead to implantation metastasis at the gastrostomy site. A clinical practice update by the American Gastroenterological Association has recommended that the pull-through PEG placement method should be avoided in all patients with oropharyngeal or esophageal cancer. It also recommends that the introducer/Push PEG method should be favored instead of the pull PEG. In such situations, an introducer-style, "Direct" gastrostomy tube can be placed endoscopically or radiologically. However, the published data comparing outcomes and safety of endoscopic "Direct" PEG (D-PEG) and interventional radiological PEG (IR-PEG) are very sparse. The D-PEG is performed under endoscopic visualization of the gastric wall which facilitates greater control and allows safe selection of gastrostomy site. Further, the presence of an endoscope enables transillumination to confirm the absence of intervening abdominal viscera between the abdominal wall and the anterior wall of the stomach. These advantages are lacking with the IR-PEG. We hypothesize that D-PEG is safer than IR-PEG. In this single center, non-randomized study, patients unable to undergo a conventional per-oral "Pull" PEG and needing a D-PEG will be prospectively enrolled. For the comparison arm, historical IR-PEG procedures at our center will be assessed. The technical success and rates of adverse events will be compared between the two arms. Approval from the Institutional review board has been obtained. Based on our experience, we estimate a sample size of 40 participants in each arm and anticipate completion of this pilot study by June 2021.