View clinical trials related to Gastric Cancer.
Filter by:Currently, standard treatment options for gastric cancer failed to first-line treatment include monotherapy with paclitaxel/irinotecan/docetaxel/albumin paclitaxel, or paclitaxel combined with ramucirumab. However, the efficacy of these regimens is still far from satisfactory. The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel combined with cadonilimab for the second-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer.
CIME is a multicenter, randomised, comparative, open-label phase III study aiming to compare the survival of patients suffering from MSI-H/dMMR locally advanced or metastatic oeasogastric adenocarcinoma treated by a bi-immunotherapy (experimental arm) versus standard current treatment (FOLFOX/XELOX + nivolumab : standard arm).
The goal of this survey is to investigate the participants' preference for a specific screening/diagnostic tool to detect and assess gastro-esophageal cancer. The main question it aims to answer are: - Which diagnostic modality is preferred by patients and the general population? - Which features of the diagnostic test are most detrimental in the decision-making for one or the other modality? - Are geographical differences present in regard to the preference for a diagnostic modality? Participants will be asked to complete a survey of 20-25min, including a brief intake regarding their socio-economic status. This approach will allow us to correct for confounding factors.
The goal of this minimally invasive interventional study is to learn if oncometabolic biomarkers, detected in the exhaled breath and blood can identify early-stage gastro-oesophageal cancer in patient at risk for gastro-oesophageal cancer. The main questions this study aims to answer: Are oncometabolites proficient and reproducible enough to function as diagnostic biomarkers? Can these biomarkers identify early-stage gastro-esophageal cancer? Researchers will compare participants with gastro-oesophageal cancer to healthy controls and participants with Barrett's esophagus to detect meaningful differences between the groups. Participants will provide a breath and blood sample during their routine standard of care visits.
This clinical trial will enroll subjects with HER2+ solid tumors and is conducted in two phases, which are phase 1a and phase 1b. The primary objective of phase 1 is to determine the safety and tolerability of AB-201 in subjects with advanced HER2+ solid tumors.
Phase II Clinical Study of Adebrelimab Combined with Apatinib and Paclitaxel for Injection(Albumin Bound) as Second-line Therapy in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer Previously Treated with Immunotherapy
This study is a prospective, single-center, observational study aimed at detecting the status of serum protein profiles at key time points in gastric cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy for advanced disease, and constructing a serum protein model for evaluating the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer. Subjects will receive neoadjuvant therapy (treatment regimen determined by the primary physician, limited to systemic therapy, with options including immune checkpoint inhibitor-based regimens and non-immune checkpoint inhibitor-based regimens). After four cycles of treatment, the efficacy will be assessed. Patients eligible for R0 resection will undergo D2 radical surgery regardless of tumor regression, while those ineligible for R0 resection will enter the palliative treatment phase (Note: Subjects are all patients who require neoadjuvant therapy even if they do not participate in this clinical study). Patients will receive regular follow-up evaluations for metastasis/recurrence and survival until tumor recurrence/progression or the last known date of patient survival (Note: Regular follow-up in this study follows the frequency of routine clinical follow-ups). The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoint is pathological response rate (based on Becker tumor regression grading, with residual tumor less than 50% considered effective preoperative treatment). Peripheral venous blood samples will be collected before the start of neoadjuvant therapy (blood sampling point 1 - baseline) and before surgery after neoadjuvant therapy (blood sampling point 2 - post-treatment). Approximately 3 ml of blood will be collected each time, and about 1.5 ml of serum will be obtained after processing. Serum protein profiling will be conducted to assess the expression of protein profiles at these treatment time points.
For locally advanced esophagogastric junction and gastric cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy can downstage T and N stage,treated distant micrometastases early , and finally improve the long-term survival. Combination of perioperative PD-1 antibody and chemotherapy for locally advanced esophagogastric junction and gastric cancer could be a novel therapy to increase response rate and reduce recurrence rate.Cadonilimab, a tetravalent bispecific antibody targeting PD-1 and CTLA-4, is designed to retain the efficacy benefit of combination of PD-1 and CTLA-4 and improve on the safety profile of the combination therapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cadonilimab Plus Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophagogastric Junction and Gastric Cancer.
Aneuploidy may be used as a more sensitive diagnostic tool to detect peritoneal metastasis compared to conventional cytology and imaging techniques. Our aim is to establish whether aneuploidy as detected in cfDNA (as a measure for ctDNA) in PLF of patients with GC may hold value as an additional staging and tumor evaluation method in GC patients.
To evaluate the feasibility, applicability, effectiveness, and health-economic value of the risk-based sequential screening modality for esophageal and gastric cancers, the investigators aim to initiate a community-based randomized controlled trial in Xun County, Henan Province, which is a high-risk region of upper gastrointestinal cancer (UGIC) in northern China. A total of 258 target villages from all the 11 communities (townships and streets) in Xun County will be randomly selected and assigned to the sequential screening group and the universal screening group at a ratio of 2:1 and the total sample size will be 21,000. In the sequential screening group, participants in the top 50% risk level (i.e., stratified as the high-risk subgroup) will be offered a standard upper gastrointestinal endoscopic screening. In contrast, all participants in the universal screening group will receive the endoscopic examination. The surveillance strategy for participants with screening-detected premalignant lesions in the sequential screening group will be tailored based on individualized risk assessment using endoscopic characteristics, pathological diagnosis, and biomarkers. Surveillance for participants in the universal screening group will adhere to current guidelines for UGIC screening and clinical treatment. Detection rates of upper gastrointestinal malignant lesions, early-stage malignant lesions and premalignant lesions, and health-economic indicators such as the unit cost per detected malignant lesions will be compared between the two groups.