View clinical trials related to Fluid Overload.
Filter by:Macrohemodynamic impact of fluid removal with net ultrafiltration in patients with continuous renal replacement therapy. A monocentric ancillary study of the EarlyDry randomized controlled trial.
Fluid administration is a commonly performed in the ICU for critically ill patients. However, it can lead to complications such as fluid overload, pulmonary edema, and increased mortality in some patients. Therefore, identifying patients who are likely to respond to fluid therapy is crucial for optimizing their management. Several methods have been used to assess fluid responsiveness, such as passive leg raising, stroke volume variation, and cardiac output monitoring. However, these methods have limitations and may not be feasible in all patients. In this study, the investigators aim to evaluate the use of velocity time integral (VTI) and Trendelenburg positioning in predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients.
The AquaPass is a non-invasive, renal-intended system designed to enhance fluid transfer through the skin, by increasing sweat rate, to treat fluid overload in heart failure patients. This study will further evaluate the safety, efficacy, and usability of the AquaPass system in the hospital and home settings.
The RADAR-Canada trial is a pilot RCT undertaken to assess the acceptability of, compliance with, and biologic consequences of a deresuscitation protocol designed to expedite the removal of excess interstitial fluid in patients who remain in a positive fluid balance following admission to an intensive care unit (ICU).
The goal of this international inception cohort study is to describe fluid administration during admittance to the intensive care unit (ICU), and provide contemporary epidemiological data on fluid accumulation, risk factors, management and outcome in critically ill adult patients.
This clinical trial aims to study intrarenal venous flow patterns change during fluid removal treatment in critically ill patients
This study aims to compare the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) furosemide. The test formulation in this study is furosemide injection, 80 mg/1 mL, buffered to a neutral pH for SC administration via an autoinjector. A commercial formulation of furosemide injection, USP, solution 10 mg/mL administered as a 40 mg IV injection over 2 minutes followed by a second dose of 40 mg, 2 hours later, will serve as the reference drug. The objectives of this study are: - To estimate the bioavailability and describe the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of furosemide administered as SC injection via autoinjector compared with equivalent dose of furosemide administered as two 40 mg IV injections, two hours apart. - To describe the safety and tolerability of furosemide administered as SC injection via an autoinjector.
Patients performing chronic hemodialysis (HD) retain more or less water between dialyses. The water is removed by ultrafiltration and usually during the cleansing of waste products - the HD. The length of HD is usually the same as the time of fluid removal while sometimes this may differ. There is no clear guideline. In previous research the investigator noted that the heart releases more NT-pro-BNP during HD in numerous of the patients. The present study aims to clarify if the speed of fluid removal during HD is a factor that may alter the release of cardiac markers during HD. If so the recommendations for the prescription of HD can be updated.
Controlling the amount of fluids given to patients in perioperative setting can significantly influence their outcomes.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of perioperative fluid management on postoperative kidney damage in gynecological cancer surgeries. The main question[s] it aims to answer are: Does fluid management applied with different hemodynamic monitoring methods affect the risk of postoperative AKI? In our clinic, three different fluid management strategies are applied depending on the anesthetist experience. Acute kidney injury will be evaluated according to the postoperative AKIN classification of conventional fluid therapy and targeted fluid therapy with noninvasive or minimally invasive monitoring.