View clinical trials related to Fluid Overload.
Filter by:Fluid administration is a commonly performed in the ICU for critically ill patients. However, it can lead to complications such as fluid overload, pulmonary edema, and increased mortality in some patients. Therefore, identifying patients who are likely to respond to fluid therapy is crucial for optimizing their management. Several methods have been used to assess fluid responsiveness, such as passive leg raising, stroke volume variation, and cardiac output monitoring. However, these methods have limitations and may not be feasible in all patients. In this study, the investigators aim to evaluate the use of velocity time integral (VTI) and Trendelenburg positioning in predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients.
The goal of this international inception cohort study is to describe fluid administration during admittance to the intensive care unit (ICU), and provide contemporary epidemiological data on fluid accumulation, risk factors, management and outcome in critically ill adult patients.
This clinical trial aims to study intrarenal venous flow patterns change during fluid removal treatment in critically ill patients
This study aims to compare the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) furosemide. The test formulation in this study is furosemide injection, 80 mg/1 mL, buffered to a neutral pH for SC administration via an autoinjector. A commercial formulation of furosemide injection, USP, solution 10 mg/mL administered as a 40 mg IV injection over 2 minutes followed by a second dose of 40 mg, 2 hours later, will serve as the reference drug. The objectives of this study are: - To estimate the bioavailability and describe the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of furosemide administered as SC injection via autoinjector compared with equivalent dose of furosemide administered as two 40 mg IV injections, two hours apart. - To describe the safety and tolerability of furosemide administered as SC injection via an autoinjector.
Patients performing chronic hemodialysis (HD) retain more or less water between dialyses. The water is removed by ultrafiltration and usually during the cleansing of waste products - the HD. The length of HD is usually the same as the time of fluid removal while sometimes this may differ. There is no clear guideline. In previous research the investigator noted that the heart releases more NT-pro-BNP during HD in numerous of the patients. The present study aims to clarify if the speed of fluid removal during HD is a factor that may alter the release of cardiac markers during HD. If so the recommendations for the prescription of HD can be updated.
Net ultra filtration (NUF) is one of the most important parameters during renal replacement therapy (RRT) whose role is to control fluid balance by water removal. To our knowledge, there are no prospective studies or guidelines about the setting of this parameter. In the NEPTUNE study, we aim to compare the hemodynamic effect of three NUF rates during RRT: 1 ml/kg/h, 2 ml/kg/h and 3 ml/kg/h. The research hypothesis is that one of the three flow rates evaluated induces the fewest hemodynamic instabilities related to RRT, while guaranteeing the best possible fluid balance.
The hypothesis of the study will be that the ratio of femoral vein diameter to femoral artery diameter will have correlation with fluid status in pediatrics.
the study aims to examine the validity of combined end-expiratory and end-inspiratory occlusion test and tidal volume challenge test for prediction of fluid responsiveness in immediate post-cardiac surgery patients
The aim of this feasibility study is to determine whether an alert embedded within the electronic health record (EHR) causes clinicians to enrol patients into a randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing oral fluid restriction versus no restriction in patients admitted to hospital with fluid overload. One of the main causes of fluid overload is heart failure where there is a lack of strong evidence to support the effectiveness of oral fluid restriction in the acute setting. This causes significant variation in clinical practice where decisions on whether or not to impose a restriction in oral fluid intake is based on the preference of the treating clinician rather than robust evidence from research. THIRST Alert is a pragmatic randomised controlled trial (RCT), embedded in the EHR, which seeks to determine whether a computerised alert for the clinical team can change clinician behaviour during routine NHS care at University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UCLH). Patients with suspected fluid overload will be identified based on the prescription of intravenous furosemide, a medication used to stimulate diuresis (increased urine output) to remove excess fluid. A repeat prescription of intravenous furosemide within the first 48 hours of an unplanned admission will trigger the alert. A clinician from the treating team will then be asked to consider enrolling the patient into the RCT if they judge that oral fluid restriction might be beneficial but they have uncertainty about this (clinical equipoise). Enrolled patients will be randomised to either oral fluid restriction of 1 litre per day or no fluid restriction. This will then be actioned through documenting as part of the clinical plan in the patients record and then communicated to the patient and the rest of the clinical team, including nursing staff. The study will record the number of patients recruited into the trial and the effect of the alert on enrolled patients' subsequent oral fluid intake. There are no additional tests or follow up for patients and the trial finishes on discharge from the study site. All trial outcomes will use data collected from routine care and the study is supported by the UCLH Biomedical Research Centre, funded by NIHR.
In Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) and treated with renal replacement therapy (RRT) often present a fluid overload which is associated with morbidity (mechanical ventilation duration increase, kidney recovery decrease) and mortality. Patients' prognostic could be improved by correcting the fluid overload with net ultrafiltration (UFnet) however it may lead to harmful iatrogenic hypovolemia responsible of deleterious ischemic lesions. In usual practice, UF net prescription are variable and there are different international recommendations. Some observational studies suggest that using a UFnet between 1 et 1.75 mL/kg/h in fluid overloaded patient decrease mortality. Fluid overload increases morbidity and mortality, particularly in RRT. Studies without RRT argue for an efficacy of management by decreasing the fluid overload .Cohort studies suggest to use a moderate UFnet instead of a low UFnet. Some data from studies on early versus late RRT that relate the fluid balance or correct the fluid overload during the early strategy argue for a beneficial effect of an early deresuscitation strategy Consequently, the impact of a moderate UFnet (to decrease the fluid overload) compared to a low UFnet (to stabilize the fluid overload) in a randomized interventional study could be assessed. The study hypothesis is that : an early fluid overload deresuscitation protocol with a high UFnet (2 ml/kg/h) targeting both the negativation of cumulated fluid balance to reach a dry weight and the maintenance of tissue perfusion. Compared to fluid overload deresuscitation protocol with a low UFnet (between 0 and 1 ml/kg/h) to reach a stabilization of cumulated fluid balance without monitoring the tissue perfusion. could improve overall, renal, hemodynamic and respiratory prognosis in fluid overloaded patients with renal replacement therapy in ICU