View clinical trials related to Epilepsy.
Filter by:A randomized trial to compare patient-completion success of REDCap and Electronic Health Record (EHR)-based anxiety & depression instrument delivery methods. Study hypothesis is that the screening completion proportion will vary across the 4 modalities tested.
The goal of this observational study is to learn about epilepsy after a stroke (post-stroke epilepsy). The main questions it aims to answer are: - What make some patients develop epilepsy after a stroke? - Does sleep have an impact on the development of post-stroke epilepsy? Participants will undergo: - Electroencephalography (EEG) - Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) - Polysomnography (only patients) Blood tests will also be taken. The patient group will be compared to the healthy controls. Researchers will also look into medical records of stroke patients hospitalized at St. Olavs hospital and collect relevant information.
CAN-RWE is an observational study that is following 500 children who have authorizations for medical cannabis for two years from across Canada.
The BLESS Study contributes to filling this information gap by collecting data from the Italian clinical practice and the Compassionate Use Program, to better characterize the clinical profile of cenobamate describing its effectiveness, safety and tolerability in adult patients diagnosed with uncontrolled focal epilepsy despite the use of at least two antiepileptic medicinal products.
The purpose of this research is to better understand how emotion processing unfolds in the brain using stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) and direct brain stimulation. This study will use standard behavioral emotion processing tasks combined with neural recording and direct brain stimulation to assess different aspects of emotion processing. Stimulation pulses during pre and post-test periods will assess the effects of stimulation before and after conditioning, the results of which will be combined with results from the activity of each electrode during the emotion tasks to inform us of the nature of emotion processing in the brain and allow us to devise brain modulation protocols in the future.
Epilepsy and its drug treatment affect fundamental aspects of an adolescent's lifestyle and can have major consequences on self-esteem and sense of identity. For many adolescents it is difficult to live with epilepsy and medication is difficult to accept; the side effects of medication, in particular even small changes in mental status and somatic appearance, are particularly feared and poorly tolerated. While it is true that drug-resistant epilepsies exist (about 30% of cases), it is also true that there exists a pseudo-resistance to drug treatment which is due to inadequate administration or poor adherence to treatment. It is estimated that 21 to 42% of patients on antiepileptic treatment don't adhere to the prescribed therapy. The literature emphasizes that non-adherence to treatment is a crucial problem for people with epilepsy, and that the adolescent population is particularly at risk. As with any chronic drug therapy, the therapeutic relationship plays an important role in the treatment of epilepsy. In adolescence, the communication that occurs within the therapeutic relationship takes on peculiar and specific aspects that go beyond the acquisition of anamnestic data and of what is usually reported explicitly in the interview. Communication must be centered on the adolescent's need for independence. Appropriate communication can make the adolescent feel more supported and can encourage him or her to gain self-awareness and control on decisions regarding his or her illness. For the physician, knowledge of the adolescent's point of view is indispensable in order to provide all the necessary information in an appropriate, understandable, and acceptable way, while at the same time acting as a mediator of communication. The objective of this project is to describe and analyze adolescents' perception of antiepileptic treatment, their awareness of the disease and of the need for drug treatment.
For the last decades, many aspects of human life have been altered by digital technology. For health care, this have opened a possibility for patients who have difficulties travelling a long distance to a hospital to meet with their health care providers over different digital platforms. With an increased digital literacy, and an aging population often living in the countryside, far from hospitals or other health care settings, an increasing need for digitalization of meetings between patients and health care personnel is inevitable. However, neuropsychological assessment is one sort of health care not possible to directly transfer into digital form. These evaluations are most often performed with well validated tests, only to be used in a paper-pencil form with a specially trained psychologist during physical meetings. The aim of this project is to investigate whether a newly developed digital neuropsychological test battery can be used to perform remote assessments of cognitive function in patients with neurological injuries and impairments. To this date, there are no such test batteries available in the Swedish language. Mindmore (www.mindmore.com) is a test system developed in Sweden, performing neuropsychological tests on a tablet, but still with the psychologist present in the room. This system is now evolving into offering the possibility for the patient to perform the test in their own home, using their own computer or tablet. The aim of the present research project is to validate this latter system (Mindmore Distance), using the following research questions: 1. Are the tests in Mindmore Distance equivalent to traditional neuropsychological tests in patients with traumatic brain injury, stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's Disease, epilepsy, and brain tumor? 2. Can the results from Mindmore Distance be transferred into neuropsychological profiles that can be used in diagnostics for specific patient groups? 3. How do the patients experience undergoing a neuropsychological evaluation on their own compared to traditional neuropsychological assessment in a physical meeting with a psychologist?
This is a Phase 2, double-blind, randomized clinical trial to explore the safety, tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of PRAX-562 in pediatric participants who have seizures associated with early-onset SCN2A-DEE and SCN8A-DEE.
The human brain presents outstanding challenges to science and medicine. Brain function and structure span broad spatial scales (from single neurons to brain-wide networks) as well as temporal scales (from milliseconds to years). Currently, none of the tools available for studying the brain can fully capture its structure and function across these diverse scales - "the neuroimaging puzzle". This poses crucial limitations to understanding how the brain works, and how it is affected by numerous diseases. The central goal of this project is to expand currently available tools for non-invasive human brain imaging, to bridge critical gaps in the neuroimaging puzzle. New methodologies will be developed, focused on ultra-high field magnetic resonance imaging (UHF MRI) and its combination with electroencephalography (EEG). New contrast mechanisms and technological advances enabled by UHF MRI and EEG will be explored to allow unprecedented views into the microstructure of brain regions like the thalamus, and to capture the activity of large-scale neuronal networks in the brain with high sensitivity, temporal and spatial specificity. These advances will be directly applied to address open questions in the diagnosis and treatment of essential tremor, and psychosis. In general, improved brain imaging techniques are critical for a deeper understanding of how the brain works, and to detect and characterize diseases more effectively, thereby improving clinical management and leading to a healthier population. The non-invasive characterization and treatment of neurodegenerative diseases like tremor is particularly relevant to aging modern societies.
The goal of this belief updating study is to assess the utility of BioEP as a complementary support tool in aiding clinical decision making in adults in first seizure clinics. The main outcomes we shall measure are: - Clinicians' perception of seizure probability. - Clinicians' decision to recommend commencing or deferring ASM (anti-seizure medications) - Clinicians' decision to refer for additional investigations/services. Participants will consent to have their EEG (that is taken at their routine care) to be used in the study. There is not extra burden to the participants taking part in the study.