View clinical trials related to Endovascular Treatment.
Filter by:The goal of this clinical trial is to test the combination of hypothermia and endovascular treatment in acute stroke patients with large vessel occlusion. The main question it aims to answer is: does an additional cooling to 35°C result in a benefit on clinical outcome ? Participants receive immediate cooling using a noninvasive transnasal cooling technique (RhonoChill) and are maintained at 35°C for 6 hours after reopening of the vessel using surface cooling, and then slowly rewarmed. Researchers will compare the intervention group (hypothermia and endovascular treatment and best medical treatment including iv thrombolysis) and control group (only endovascular treatment and best medical treatment including iv thrombolysis) to see if additional hypothermia leads to a better outcome after 3 months without relevant complications.
Tocilizumab may exert neuroprotective effects in patients with ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular treatment
The purpose of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment with or without preceding intravenous Tenecteplase in patients with late-window (4.5-24 hours of symptom onset) acute ischemic stroke due to middle cerebral artery (MCA) M1 or M2 occlusion.
Exploring the Efficacy and Safety of Emergent Endovascular Treatment in Patients with Mild Ischemic Stroke Caused by Acute Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion based on Perfusion Imaging Screening
To investigate the Endovascular Treatment difference between Chinese city and country hospital.
This study is a prospective, multi-center observational study, which evaluates the effectiveness and safety of endovascular therapy in the real world for infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease from intermittent claudication to chronic threatening limb ischemia.
To investigate the real situation of assessment, diagnosis and treatment of acute ischemic stroke patients with endovascular therapy.
Although older studies, most of them retrospective in design, advocated sedation over general anesthesia during endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke, a recent meta-analysis and randomized studies have shown that general anesthesia is associated with better functional status at 3 months compared with local anesthesia and sedation. In our center, most procedures are performed under general anesthesia, and once the procedure is complete, the patient is transferred intubated and sedated to the ICU. If the patient is hemodynamically and respiratory stable, the patient will be extubated, and will be discharged to the Neurology hospitalization floor. Several factors have been described that may influence the evolution and functional status at three months of patients who have suffered a stroke and have received endovascular treatment, such as the time between the onset of symptoms and admission to the ward for performing the procedure, the use of general anesthesia compared to sedation and local anesthesia, adequate control of blood pressure, the size of the cerebral infarct, or a worse neurological examination at the time of the procedure. In turn, several factors have been described that may influence the success of extubation in a patient who has suffered an acute ischemic stroke and who has required orotracheal intubation, such as the absence of dysarthria, the size of the infarct, the location of the infarction, the NIHSS (National Institutes of health Stroke Scale) or neurological status prior to orotracheal intubation. The investigators do not know, however, whether the time of mechanical ventilation can influence the evolution and functional status at three months of patients who have suffered a stroke and have received endovascular treatment under general anesthesia
The primary objective of this study is to determine the feasibility and safety of receiving intravascular hypothermia treatment for patients experiencing endovascular treatment after acute ischemic stroke(AIS) due to a large vessel occlusion.
Two recent randomized controlled trials (BAOCHE and ATTENTION) have confirmed the efficacy and safety of endovascular therapy in patient with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to basilar artery occlusion (BAO). However, it is still inconclusive whether there is any differences between endovascular therapy with or without bridging intravenous thrombolysis in acute BAO. So far, no randomized controlled trial has been conducted specifically for endovascular therapy with or without intravenous thrombolysis for ischemic stroke due to BAO. Therefore, this study plans to conduct a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial to compare the functional outcomes between endovascular therapy with and without intravenous thrombolysis in patient with AIS due to BAO. This study is a multicenter, parallel, open label, randomized controlled trial comparing direct endovascular therapy versus endovascular therapy bridging intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). This study intends to include patients with AIS due to BAO fulfilling the following inclusion criteria: patients with AIS caused by BAO confirmed by CTA/MRA/DSA; IVT can be started within 4.5 hours after symptoms onset; Age ≥ 18 years old; NIHSS score ≥ 6. The main outcome is the 3-month mRS scale score. Secondary outcomes included NIHSS at 24 hours and 7 days after surgery, CTA vascular recanalization at 24-72 hours, mRS at 5-7 days, and infarct volume. The safety outcomes included 90-day mortality and the incidence of sICH.