View clinical trials related to Endovascular Treatment.
Filter by:Explore the effectiveness and safety of emergency endovascular treatment in patients with mild ischemic stroke due to acute large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation, identified through perfusion imaging.
Tocilizumab may exert neuroprotective effects in patients with ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular treatment
The purpose of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment with or without preceding intravenous Tenecteplase in patients with late-window (4.5-24 hours of symptom onset) acute ischemic stroke due to middle cerebral artery (MCA) M1 or M2 occlusion.
Exploring the Efficacy and Safety of Emergent Endovascular Treatment in Patients with Mild Ischemic Stroke Caused by Acute Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion based on Perfusion Imaging Screening
This study is a prospective, multi-center observational study, which evaluates the effectiveness and safety of endovascular therapy in the real world for infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease from intermittent claudication to chronic threatening limb ischemia.
To investigate the real situation of assessment, diagnosis and treatment of acute ischemic stroke patients with endovascular therapy.
Although older studies, most of them retrospective in design, advocated sedation over general anesthesia during endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke, a recent meta-analysis and randomized studies have shown that general anesthesia is associated with better functional status at 3 months compared with local anesthesia and sedation. In our center, most procedures are performed under general anesthesia, and once the procedure is complete, the patient is transferred intubated and sedated to the ICU. If the patient is hemodynamically and respiratory stable, the patient will be extubated, and will be discharged to the Neurology hospitalization floor. Several factors have been described that may influence the evolution and functional status at three months of patients who have suffered a stroke and have received endovascular treatment, such as the time between the onset of symptoms and admission to the ward for performing the procedure, the use of general anesthesia compared to sedation and local anesthesia, adequate control of blood pressure, the size of the cerebral infarct, or a worse neurological examination at the time of the procedure. In turn, several factors have been described that may influence the success of extubation in a patient who has suffered an acute ischemic stroke and who has required orotracheal intubation, such as the absence of dysarthria, the size of the infarct, the location of the infarction, the NIHSS (National Institutes of health Stroke Scale) or neurological status prior to orotracheal intubation. The investigators do not know, however, whether the time of mechanical ventilation can influence the evolution and functional status at three months of patients who have suffered a stroke and have received endovascular treatment under general anesthesia
Two recent randomized controlled trials (BAOCHE and ATTENTION) have confirmed the efficacy and safety of endovascular therapy in patient with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to basilar artery occlusion (BAO). However, it is still inconclusive whether there is any differences between endovascular therapy with or without bridging intravenous thrombolysis in acute BAO. So far, no randomized controlled trial has been conducted specifically for endovascular therapy with or without intravenous thrombolysis for ischemic stroke due to BAO. Therefore, this study plans to conduct a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial to compare the functional outcomes between endovascular therapy with and without intravenous thrombolysis in patient with AIS due to BAO. This study is a multicenter, parallel, open label, randomized controlled trial comparing direct endovascular therapy versus endovascular therapy bridging intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). This study intends to include patients with AIS due to BAO fulfilling the following inclusion criteria: patients with AIS caused by BAO confirmed by CTA/MRA/DSA; IVT can be started within 4.5 hours after symptoms onset; Age ≥ 18 years old; NIHSS score ≥ 6. The main outcome is the 3-month mRS scale score. Secondary outcomes included NIHSS at 24 hours and 7 days after surgery, CTA vascular recanalization at 24-72 hours, mRS at 5-7 days, and infarct volume. The safety outcomes included 90-day mortality and the incidence of sICH.
Compare the effectiveness and safety of contact aspiration (CA) and stent retriever (SR) in acute ischemic stroke patients with basilar artery occlusion.
This is a prospective, randomized, open-label, evaluator-blinded, single center, proof of concept trial to explore possible beneficial effect of minocycline on acute ischemic stroke (AIS) undergoing endovascular treatment due to basilar artery occlusion (BAO). Minocycline has excellent safety profiles, have been previously demonstrated individually to reduce infarction in animal models of stroke, and have potentially mechanisms of antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic and protection of blood-brain barrier. However, it is not known whether minocycline can reduce futile recanalization of endovascular treatment, and improve the outcome of patients with AIS due to BAO. Eligible and willing subjects will be randomly assigned to the treatment group or the control group. The treatment group will receive 200 mg oral minocycline within three hours prior to successful reperfusion, followed by 100 mg every 12 hours times for a total of 5 days. Both groups will receive endovascular thrombectomy and standard medical. The treatment with minocycline will start as soon as possible after diagnosis of stroke. Measures of stroke severity and disability will be recorded at baseline and through the follow-up periods (90 days). The evaluator will be blind to the allocation of patients further minimizing the bias.