View clinical trials related to Emergencies.
Filter by:The study evaluates and compares effect of emergency surgery and colonic stents for treatment of malignant colonic obstructions.
This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to investigate the effect of damage-control surgery on mortality in patients with non-traumatic abdominal emergencies. Literature search will be conducted using PubMed. Two meta-analyses will be performed comparing (1) mortality in patients with non-trauma damage control surgery vs. non-trauma conventional surgery and (2) the observed vs. expected mortality rate in patients undergoing non-trauma damage-control surgery.
A retrospective study to determine the potential value of MDW among other biomarkers in the diagnosis of infection.
Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that has doubled in incidence over the past decade, and timely aggressive medical intervention has been shown to save lives. Rural sepsis patients have a 38% higher mortality rate, possibly attributable to delays in early sepsis care. Rural emergency department (ED)-based provider-to-provider telemedicine has been proposed to standardize care and support local clinicians in rural hospitals. The goal of this multicenter observational comparative effectiveness study is to measure the association between tele-ED use and clinical outcomes in a cohort of rural sepsis patients.
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been widely studied in elective abdominal surgeries and have shown better outcomes. However the utility of these protocols in emergency abdominal surgeries has not been widely investigated. OBJECTIVE: To study the outcomes of application of ERAS protocols in patients undergoing perforated duodenal ulcers repairs in emergency abdominal surgeries. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was conducted in Surgical Unit 1 BBH from August 2018 to December 2019 with a total sample size of 36 patients with the diagnosis of perforated duodenal ulcer. Patients were randomly divided in two groups. Group A consisted of early oral feeding group and group B consisted of traditional postoperative care group. Outcome results studied were the length of hospital stay, duodenal repair site leak, severity of pain (VAS score) and duration of post-operative ileus. Results were analysed on SPSS version 20 and chi-square and independent t-test were applied. KEY WORDS: Perforated duodenal ulcer, ERAS protocol, randomized controlled trial, duodenal repair site leak, length of hospital stay, VAS score, post-operative ileus
Despite an increasing armamentarium of behavioral and biomedical HIV prevention methods, since 2010 rates of new infection have remained around 40,000 annually. The demonstrated efficacy and subsequent approval of emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV by the FDA in 2012 was thought to represent a turning point that could significantly reduce the number of new infections. Since approval, the promise of PrEP as a transformative intervention has yet to be realized. Despite the implementation of systems for clinical evaluation for and initiation of PrEP by primary care providers, HIV specialists, and STI clinics, numerous barriers to PrEP expansion have been identified, including: 1) patient and provider lack of knowledge, 2) lack of access to medical care among high-risk individuals, 3) provider discomfort and inexperience with screening for risk behaviors, and 4) insurance and affordability. This proposal seeks to expand access to and engagement in PrEP among high risk individuals though an innovative delivery approach in the Emergency Department (ED) while addressing these four barriers.
In this study the participant will be invited to be seated in the self-measurement kiosk after registration in the Emergency department. In this kiosk, the participant will be measuring their own vitals and answering a short questionnaire regarding the reason for presentation. All these results are displayed on a screen for the triage nurse. Based on the results, high-risk patients will be highlighted on the screen, so they may be seen faster.
Open-label randomized clinical trial, one center, to compare the need for face-to-face re-consultation after discharge for COVID-19 between a telematic monitoring through a mobile app and the regular primary care setting.
This research aims to improve our knowledge of the epidemiology of patients consulting in the COvid-19 Possible REspiratory Units (RECOP unit). Indeed, the epidemic linked to COVID-19 affects France and impacts its health system. The reception of all intermediate patients will be on the Emergency Structures (SU). Indeed, the French healthcare system centralizes unscheduled urgent care on the ER. The aspecific respiratory symptomatology in "intermediate" patients indicates them all the more at an admission to SU or the diagnostic approach to respiratory difficulty may be carried out. A central issue of this diagnostic strategy will be to be rapid, since the diagnosis will have to be made in the context of significant flows, with a need to quickly refer patients to the most suitable downstream service, while limiting the risk contamination of caregivers and vulnerable patients if a COVID-19 + patient is admitted to an unsuitable service. However, virological tests do not currently allow rapid results for COVID-19. Research project of investigatory aims to develop a predictive model of the risk of being COVID-19 positive for patients admitted to the emergency room for acute dyspnea.
Patients who suffer hypoglycaemia in the community requiring the services of an ambulance are known to have a high short term mortality based on previous work. What is not known is the demographics of this group and also what the cause of death was for individuals whom unfortunately passed away in the time following ambulance callout. Importantly, studies looking at interventions to reduce poor outcomes in this group are lacking. The investigators conducted a pilot trial with the main goals to: 1. Characterise this group in more detail and ascertain what was recorded as cause of death in those whom passed away in the months/years following community hypoglycaemia 2. Ascertain if a simple nurse led intervention, focusing on educating participants on avoidance of hypoglycaemia, could improve outcome.