Clinical Trials Logo

Perforated Duodenal Ulcer clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Perforated Duodenal Ulcer.

Filter by:
  • None
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT04994184 Completed - Clinical trials for Perforated Duodenal Ulcer

Scoring System in Predicting Perforated Duodenal Ulcer Morbidity and Mortality in Bpkihs

Start date: March 25, 2021
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Different scoring systems were developed for risk prediction and adjustment of morbidity from perforated duodenal ulcer. However, these scoring systems are not routinely used in perforated duodenal ulcer patient in everyday clinical practice. Identification of patient with a high risk of adverse outcomes following surgery is important for clinical decision-making which can assist in risk stratification and triage e.g. timing and extent of pre-operative respiratory and circulatory stabilization, postoperative admission to a high dependency unit (HDU), the level and extent of monitoring, and inclusion in specific perioperative care protocols. Few studies assessed and compared the accuracy indices of PULP with BOEY and ASA in predicting post PPU repair 30-day morbidity Further, the efficacy must be verified in individual settings like ours. So we wish to assess its efficacy in BPKIHS-a tertiary referral center of eastern Nepal.

NCT ID: NCT04716166 Completed - Cholecystitis Clinical Trials

Incentive Spirometry and Upper Abdominal Laparoscopic Surgery

Start date: October 1, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

To compare the effects of volume-oriented versus flow-oriented incentive spirometry on pulmonary function tests and functional capacity in patients of upper abdominal laparoscopic surgery. Previous studies were designed to target only spirometer without focusing on its different types and their effects. This study covers the research gap and therefore is designed to observe effects of different types of spirometer on pulmonary function of patients undergoing upper abdominal laparoscopic surgery.

NCT ID: NCT04431037 Completed - Clinical trials for Perforated Duodenal Ulcer

Early Oral Feeding vs Traditional Post-operative Care In Emergency Abdominal Surgeries

Start date: August 13, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been widely studied in elective abdominal surgeries and have shown better outcomes. However the utility of these protocols in emergency abdominal surgeries has not been widely investigated. OBJECTIVE: To study the outcomes of application of ERAS protocols in patients undergoing perforated duodenal ulcers repairs in emergency abdominal surgeries. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was conducted in Surgical Unit 1 BBH from August 2018 to December 2019 with a total sample size of 36 patients with the diagnosis of perforated duodenal ulcer. Patients were randomly divided in two groups. Group A consisted of early oral feeding group and group B consisted of traditional postoperative care group. Outcome results studied were the length of hospital stay, duodenal repair site leak, severity of pain (VAS score) and duration of post-operative ileus. Results were analysed on SPSS version 20 and chi-square and independent t-test were applied. KEY WORDS: Perforated duodenal ulcer, ERAS protocol, randomized controlled trial, duodenal repair site leak, length of hospital stay, VAS score, post-operative ileus