View clinical trials related to Emergencies.
Filter by:Malnutrition and inappropriate prescribing of renally excreted drugs are common among older persons and are associated with severe consequences such as complicated courses of treatment, mortality, and reduced quality of life. The overall purpose of CanPan is to optimize treatment of older persons with malnutrition with a focus on appetite stimulation and optimized prescribing of renal risk drugs. The CanPan trial consists of two sub-studies. Substudy 1 will provide knowledge on appetite and appetite stimulation and together, sub study 1 and 2 will offer unique knowledge on how body composition, renal function and biomarkers of organ function influence pharmacokinetics for a highly lipophilic (Sativex®) and hydrophilic (Hexamycin®) drug in older medical patients with malnutrition.
Rationale Identifying emergency department (ED) patients at high and low risk shortly after admission could help decision-making regarding patient care. Several clinical risk scores and triage systems for stratification of patients have been developed, but often underperform in clinical practice. Moreover, most of these risk scores only have been diagnostically validated in an observational cohort, but never have been evaluated for their actual clinical impact. In a recent retrospective study that was conducted in the Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), a novel clinical risk score, the RISKINDEX, was introduced that predicted 31-day mortality of sepsis patients presenting to an ED. The RISKINDEX hereby also outperformed internal medicine specialists. Observational follow-up studies underlined the potential of the risk score. However, it remains unknown to what extent these models have any beneficial value when it is actually implemented in clinical practice. Objective To determine the diagnostic accuracy, policy changes and clinical impact of the RISKINDEX as basis to conduct a large scale, multi-center randomised trial. Study design The MARS-ED study is designed as a multi-center, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority pilot clinical trial. Study population Adult patients who are assessed and treated by an internal medicine specialist in the ED of whom a minimum of 4 different laboratory results (hematology or clinical chemistry, required for calculation of ML risk score) are available within the first two hours of the ED visit. Intervention Physicians will be presented with the ML risk score (the RISKINDEX) of the patients they are actively treating, directly after assessment of regular diagnostics has taken place. Main study parameters Primary - Diagnostic accuracy, policy changes and clinical impact of a novel clinical risk score (the RISKINDEX) Secondary - Policy changes due to presentation of ML score (treatment policy, requesting ancillary investigations, treatment restrictions (i.e., no intubation or resuscitation) - Intensive care (ICU) and medium care (MC) admission - Length of admission - Mortality within 31 days - Readmission - Patient preference - Feasibility of novel clinical risk score
This study aims to investigate whether the use of medical checklists in the emergency department can decrease resuscitation time in critically ill patients.
Based on data from the American Heart Association's (AHA) Get With the Guidelines-Resuscitation (GTWG-R) registry, the incidence of adult treated in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) was about 10 per 1,000 bed-days (290,000 patients per year), and 15 to 20% of adult IHCA patients survived to hospital discharge (i.e., ~80% mortality). Despite the significant morbidity and mortality caused by IHCA, ED-based IHCA is surprisingly less studied. The investigators have utilized electronic medical record (EMR)'s big data (>700,000 visits) from our hospital to investigate, for the first time, the epidemiology and outcome of IHCA in the ED in Taiwan. The investigators also have developed and validated a simple prediction tool for ED-based IHCA, the Emergency Department In-hospital Cardiac Arrest Score (EDICAS). This tool has also been externally validated using Far Eastern Memorial Hospital's ED data. In addition, the investigators also have developed and validated a vital-sign trajectory-based longitudinal model (group-based trajectory modeling [GBTM]) to predict ED-based IHCA. Based on these studies, the investigators now propose to (1) Embed the EDICAS into our hospital information system (HIS) in real-time at ED triage to identify high-risk patients (EDICAS 6+); and (2) Distribute wearable smart wristbands to high-risk patients to augment vital signs monitoring and send alerts based on GBTM results. The detection and intervention components together form the rapid response system, the Emergency Department In-hospital Cardiac Arrest Response System (EDICARS). In this study, the investigators will enroll and randomize 10 attending physicians into the EDICARS or the usual care arm for 3 months, with each of them treating 100 patients (patients clustered within physicians). The trial will stop for 2 months as a wash-out period, and an interim analysis will be performed. The physicians will then cross over, and each of them will treat 100 patients for another 3 months. A total of 2,000 adult patients will be enrolled. The primary outcome is a composite rate of ED-based IHCA and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The secondary outcomes include time from ED triage to ED-based cardiac arrest, ICU and hospital length of stay, early ward-based IHCA, and early ICU transfer.
Despite almost universal usage of supplemental oxygen therapy in patients presenting in the emergency department with traumatic brain injury (TBI), optimal oxygen levels are unclear. The investigators propose a pilot multi-center randomized controlled trial to test the hypothesis that maintaining intermediate normal as opposed to high normal oxygen levels in patients presenting in the emergency department with TBI is feasible, and to obtain preliminary data on the efficacy of the two approaches to oxygen therapy. The aim is that the investigators produce pilot data, which could inform the design of potential subsequent larger clinical trials.
Acute respiratory infections are a common reason of attendance at emergency departments. It is also the main reason of unnecessary antibiotic prescription. Antibiotics save lives, but can also directly harm patients by causing antibiotic-associated adverse events. Antibiotic use is directly related to resistance, which is one of the major threats of our century. In addition, some microorganisms live in and on the human body and promote many aspects of our health. Antibiotic treatment can disturb those microorganisms and therefore have long-lasting negative effects on our health. Unfortunately, it is difficult to differentiate between viral infections, which usually heal spontaneously, and bacterial pneumonia, which needs antibiotics treatment. This is one of the reasons of this over-prescribing of antibiotics. This project aims to reduce widespread use of antibiotics in the emergency department through a new diagnostic strategy of bacterial pneumonia. This strategy includes sequential use of well-known techniques: a clinical score, lung ultrasound and finally a biomarker, procalcitonin. The latter tends to be higher in bacterial infections. The combination of these different tests improves the diagnostic process and allows improved use of targeted antibiotics, with the ultimate goal of better patient management. The study will compare the antibiotic prescription rate and the clinical course of patients managed using this new diagnostic approach with those managed as usual. The project will also evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of this strategy and its cost-effectiveness. These two aspects are essential for a wider implementation of this innovative diagnostic approach and decrease antibiotic resistance.
The aim of the study is to synthesize qualitative evidence related to preventable hospitalizations/ emergency department visits from the perspectives of patients, their families/caregivers, health care providers, and stakeholders, in the hope to identify generalizable conclusions about why social risk factors matter to preventable hospitalizations/ emergency department visits
This is a prospective clinical research study to test the effectiveness of the Levonorgestrel (LNG) 52 mg Intrauterine Device (IUD) for emergency contraception (EC) and same-day start use that will enroll people receiving care at Planned Parenthood affiliates across the U.S. Our prior work demonstrated efficacy (shows that it works in an ideal setting) for the LNG 52 mg IUD for these uses and this study will test effectiveness (how well it works in the real world) in a larger, heterogenous population in a usual care setting where participants select their method and are not randomly assigned to it. The study population will include people initiating an LNG 52 mg IUD and meet inclusion and exclusion criteria at 8 Planned Parenthood affiliates nationwide. Planned Parenthood Federation of America was the first major healthcare organization to change its practice to incorporate the changes we are studying here. As such, all study participants will be offered the opportunity to choose the interventional IUD at the site they visit. The primary outcome is pregnancy status one month after LNG IUD placement by home urine pregnancy test or clinical record review. Participant follow up concludes one month after enrollment. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate reproducibility of earlier findings in a more heterogenous population. As such, IUD placement is not a study procedure but a component of clinical care. The study interventions only involve study participation and provision of data around the use of the levonorgestrel 52 mg IUD for EC or same day start.
Our study aims to evaluate whether the Emergency Department (PS) can support the health system to improve the prevention and management of chronic inflammatory diseases and ensure actions aimed at screening, raising awareness and informing the population. Specifically, the determination of the prevalence of a widely diffused pathology such as fatty liver disease aims to be the precursor of future pilot studies aimed at evaluating the advantages and critical issues of the PS as a prevention tool.
Moms will call and agencies will determine if she is eligible based on basic criteria. If she is eligible, the agency will send her an intake application link to complete, which includes a consent form. After completing the survey, if she is still eligible, she will be placed on a waitlist for services. When a bed becomes available in an individual agency, the agency will call two moms at the top of the waitlist, conduct in-person interviews to confirm eligibility and good fit. They will use a computer to randomly assign one to treatment and one to control. Agency will let moms know of their status and will allow the treatment mom to move in. Moms in treatment and control will be surveyed approximately one year post the mother's reported due date of the child.