View clinical trials related to Embolism.
Filter by:This study was conducted to investigate whether the use of tourniquet after delivery of the fetus could reduce the amount of amniotic fluid entering the bloodstream and thus reduce the incidence of intraoperative adverse events.
Pulmonary embolism (PE) remains a high mortality and morbidity disease state. The investigators have previously shown that use of a Pulmonary Embolism Response Team (PERT) can improve overall readmission, bleeding, and mortality outcomes. Unfortunately, PERT may still be underutilized from a national standpoint and may not be readily available in underserved areas. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) may help streamline and systematically ensure unbiased mechanism for activation of PERT for discussion of patients with siginficant clot burden and hemodynamic abnormalities. AI algorithms have been FDA approved for use of triage of the PE patient. The institutional PERT program will adapt the use of an AI algorithm for activation as routine care; the efficiency of activation will be compared to our retrospective historical comparison for efficiency and appropriateness of activation. The active phase of the study is designed to further differentiate between patients who are considered to be intermediate-high risk category but yet do not clearly qualify for invasive therapy (catheter-directed therapy, systemic thrombolysis, or invasive hemodynamic support). These patients will undergo walking test to further understand noninvasive hemodynamic compromise and undergo 2:1 randomization to early-invasive strategy versus mtranditional medical therapy.
A new algorithm derived from only patient age and components of the complete blood count and basic metabolic panel can identify patients discharged from the hospital who may benefit from a blood thinner (called rivaroxaban) to decrease their risk of blood clots, and for whom the risk of bleeding is minimal. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of a pop-up alert, which will be seen by clinicians when a discharging patient has been identified as being someone for whom the risk of blood clots is high, but for whom bleeding risk is estimated to be low. The pop-up alert will be enabled in a sequential fashion for each group of hospitals in 1 month blocks. We will look to see if the pop-up alert changes the number of patients who receive rivaroxaban. We will also measure the outcomes of blood clots and bleeding among all discharging patients.
A single-center, open-label, exploratory randomized controlled study is proposed with the following objectives: whether prolonging the duration of anticoagulation to 12 months, compared with 6 months of routine anticoagulation, helps to reduce major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in patients with left ventricular thrombosis and to reduce recurrence of thrombosis, as well as to assess their bleeding risk. Patients with a definite diagnosis of left ventricular thrombus and age ≥18 years were included in cardiac ultrasound (including general ultrasound and sonography) and other examinations during hospitalization and outpatient visits. Exclusion criteria were detailed in the study protocol. GROUPING: According to the duration of anticoagulation, they were divided into extended anticoagulation group (12 months) and conventional anticoagulation group (6 months). INTERVENTION: This study is planned to extend the administration of rivaroxaban (Pulsatilla) 20 mg to 12 months in the experimental group. The conventional anticoagulation group will take the drug for 6 months Study Endpoints: The primary efficacy endpoint is a major cardiovascular-vascular adverse event at 1 year; the primary safety endpoint is bleeding of grade 3 or higher as defined by the BARC classification at 1 year. Patient Follow-up Program: Subjects will require a total of 12 on-site follow-up visits (one per month) for safety evaluation, efficacy evaluation, medication adherence evaluation, and imaging follow-up at months 3, 6, and 12.
Lower limb trauma requiring immobilization is a very frequent condition that is associated with an increased risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE). The TRiP(cast) score has been developed to provide individual VTE risk stratification and help in thromboprophylactic anticoagulation decision. The recent CASTING study had confirmed that patients with a TRiP(cast) score <7 have a very low risk of VTE and could be safely manage without prophylactic treatment. Conversely, patients with a score ≥ 7 have a high-risk of VTE and require a prophylactic anticoagulant treatment. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) have been shown to be effective in this indication. However, in the CASTING study, the 3-month symptomatic VTE rate was 2.6% in this subgroup despite LMWH prophylactic treatment. This result suggests that LMWH are not sufficiently effective in this particular subgroup of high-risk patients. Direct oral anticoagulants, and in particular rivaroxaban, may be an effective and safe alternative to LMWH. In the PRONOMOS study, comparing LMWH with rivaroxaban in patients who had undergone non-major lower limb surgery, the relative risk of symptomatic VTE was 0.25 (95% CI = 0.09 - 0.75) in favor of rivaroxaban 10mg. No significant increase in bleeding was found. In addition, as LMWH treatment requires subcutaneous daily injections, the use of rivaroxaban may positively impact patients' quality of life as well as being effective in medico-economic terms. The aims of this study are to demonstrate that rivaroxaban is at least as effective, easier to use and more efficient than LMWH in patients with trauma to the lower limb requiring immobilisation and deemed to be at risk of venous thromboembolism (TRiP(cast) score ≥ 7). High-risk patients are randomized to receive either rivaroxaban or LMWH. They are followed up at 45 days and 90 days to assess the occurrence of thrombotic events or bleeding, as well as their satisfaction with the treatment received.
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is frequently suspected in emergency departments (ED) patients which often leads to the prescription of DDimer testing and irradiative chest imaging (Computed Tomographic Pulmonary Angiogram CTPA in most cases).[1] Indeed, an increased use of CTPA has been reported without clear benefit in terms of prognosis.This increased use is reportedly associated with potential overdiagnosis of PE, increased cost, length of ED stay, and side effects from both chest imaging and undue anticoagulant treatments. The standard diagnostic strategy for PE work up includes three steps with an initial evaluation of clinical probability, followed by D-dimer testing if indicated, followed by chest imaging if necessary - Computed tomographic pulmonary angiogram CTPA being the imaging modality of choice. A large European prospective study has reported that the use of CTPA has constantly increased without change in the diagnostic yield. In order to reduce the use of CTPA, it has been validated that in patients with a low likelihood of PE, the D-dimer threshold for ordering CTPA can be raised at 1000 ng/ml. It has been validated that a low likelihood of PE can be determined either with the YEARS or the PEGeD clinical decision rules. These latter two include one common item being "Is PE the most likely diagnosis". A retrospective cohort study of 3330 patients reported that using this sole question of "Is PE the most likely diagnosis" can be safely used to raise the D-dimer threshold to 1000 ng/ml, and that this performs as well as YEARS and PEGeD. This simple question is easier to use by emergency physicians compared to complex ones, which are reportedly seldom used by emergency physicians. Therefore, the validation of the "PE unlikely" simple and straightforward decision rule could increase physicians' adherence and therefore limit the use of chest imaging. The hypothesis of this prospective study is that the likelihood of PE assessed to elevate the DDimer threshold to 1000 ng/ml can be estimated by the sole question of "is PE the most likely diagnosis", and to validate a global simplified diagnostic strategy for PE in the ED. The intervention will be the patient's management with a simplified global strategy. Whether PE is the most likely diagnostic will be assessed by the unstructured implicit clinician's estimation. In patient with a clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism: DDimer testing will be performed. If the likelihood of PE is low (PE is not the most likely diagnosis), then threshold for DDimer testing will be 1000 ng/ml. If the likelihood of PE is high (PE is the most likely diagnosis), then the age-adjusted DDimer threshold will be applied.
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Cleaner™ Pro Thrombectomy System for aspiration thrombectomy in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE).
The objective of the study is to evaluate the prognostic performance of the chair lift test in the initial assessment of the severity of non-severe pulmonary embolism in hospitalized patients, in comparison with the current pulmonary embolism risk stratification score using the sPESI score refined by the use of cardiac biomarkers and right ventricular dysfunction
To demonstrate the efficacy and safety of the Bashir™ Endovascular Catheter for the administration of pharmaco-mechanical catheter directed therapy using pulse spray of r-tPA for the treatment of acute submassive pulmonary embolism
Monitoring risks of cardiovascular diseases in working population (18 - 65 years old) by monitoring their BMI, ankle-brachial index with pulse wave velocity, cholesterol and glycemia.