There are about 13332 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Netherlands. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The purpose of this Clinical investigation is to assess the impact of the Multi Point Pacing (MPP) feature at 12 months in the treatment of patients not responding to standard Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) after 6 months.
This is a 26-week, randomized extension of the Phase 3 double-blind placebo-controlled studies, EVP-6124-024 and EVP-6124-025. In this extension study, subjects who complete study EVP-6124-024 or EVP-6124-025 and fulfill all entry criteria will be randomized to receive EVP-6124 for an additional 26 weeks.
The purpose of this study is to collect patient related benefit data following treatment for permanent hearing loss with a hearing implant from the company Cochlear over a period of 2 years post treatment. Assessment of benefits is based on standard questionnaires of hearing ability and quality of life in general.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and technical feasibility of implanting the Latella Implant System in the treatment of patients with medial osteoarthritis of the knee.
This is an open label exploratory study to investigate the safety of 400 milligram (mg ) twice a day (b.i.d.) GSK2586184 in patients with moderate to severe, active ulcerative colitis (UC). Study medication will be administered orally (as tablets), twice daily, for up to 8 weeks (56 days). Study medication will be taken with food. Each subject will have 6 out-patient visits: Screening (Day -30 to -1); Baseline and Start of treatment (Day 1); Week 2 (Day 14); Week 4 (Day 28); Week 8 (Day 56); and Follow-up (Week 12; Day 84). Visit windows for weeks 2, 4 and 8 will be + 2 days. The primary objective of this study is to assess the safety and tolerability of GSK2586184. The primary endpoints to measure safety are laboratory tests (including haematology, clinical chemistry and serum creatinine), vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), physical examination, and adverse event reporting. These are standard measurements to evaluate safety.
This is a phase I, multicentre randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess the safety and tolerability of continuous i.c.v. administration of sNN0029 infusion solution at a dose of 4µg/day in patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS).
The objective of the investigation is to document New Mio 1-piece is non-inferior (no worse) in reducing leakage (4-point scale) compared to Standard of Care.
This is an open-label, multicenter, Phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral selinexor in participants with recurrent gliomas.
This is a prospective, multicenter, single arm feasibility study of the safety and performance of the GRADION™ Hip Total Cartilage Replacement (TCR)™ in patients who require cartilage replacement.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a good alternative treatment for patients with severe aortic valve stenosis with similar mid-term success rates as compared to surgery. Periprosthetic aortic regurgitation (PAR) after TAVR remains an important limitation of this technique. Moderate to severe PAR occurs in 15-45% of the cases and it is an independent predictor of mortality after TAVR. Little is known about potential differences in severity of PAR among different types of aortic valve prosthesis. The current randomized study aims to evaluate potential differences between the Edwards SAPIEN bioprosthesis and the Medtronic CoreValve® system with main focus on PAR and additional focus on other clinical and imaging endpoints. Primary objective of this study is to investigate the difference in the severity of PAR, measured with 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3DTEE), between patients undergoing the implantation of the Edwards SAPIEN bioprosthesis versus patients receiving the Medtronic CoreValve® bioprosthesis. Secondary objectives of this study include: investigating the value of different imaging modalities in evaluating periprosthetic regurgitation after TAVR and studying the difference in clinical endpoints according to VARC-2 definitions and quality of life after TAVR between two available aortic valve prostheses.