There are about 9745 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Israel. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
Primary objective: Phase I Proof of concept: treatment with smaller doses of elemental calcium from ACC compared to CCS can maintain target serum calcium (corrected for albumin) values (7.0-10.0 mg/dL). Phase II To test the hypothesis that treatment with smaller doses of elemental calcium from ACC compared to CCS can maintain target serum calcium (corrected for albumin) values (7.0-10.0 mg/dL). Secondary objectives: Phase I - ACC dose selection - to confirm the conversion factor of ACC from CCS - To determine the effect of food on ACC absorption Phase II - To test the hypothesis that treatment with smaller doses of elemental calcium from ACC compared to CCS will not cause an increase in hypercalciuria in patients with hypoparathyroidism - To test the hypothesis that smaller doses of elemental calcium from ACC can reduce the side effects related with high calcium consumption. Amorphical has a strong basis to believe that the ACC product is better absorbed compared to the commercially available CCS products and therefore, can maintain desirable target albumin corrected calcium values in serum (CA) with smaller doses of elemental calcium from ACC. As results, the burden of taking high doses of calcium supplementation along with the side effects of the standard therapy (gastrointestinal discomfort and hypercalciuria) will be reduced. Testing serum CA and urine calcium values in subjects with hypoparathyroidism may provide a straightforward method to test this hypothesis. The study is designed to be conducted with extra precaution in order to avoid disturbing the fragile balance between CA levels in serum and calcium levels urine. The crossover design of phase II of the study allows a more accurate and reliable comparison of results attributable to the specific treatment within the same individual. In addition, the subjects will continue consuming all their routine medication throughout the trial. The subjects in the control arm will consume their routine calcium supplement doses thus, will be treated with a standard of care.
The purpose of this study is to find a safe, tolerable, and efficacious dose of BMS-986466 when given orally, in combination with adagrasib with or without cetuximab in participants with advanced KRAS G12C-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma (PDAC), biliary tract cancer (BTC), or colorectal cancer (CRC).
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate efficacy of plitidepsin in pre-specified groups of immunocompromised patients with symptomatic COVID-19 requiring hospital care versus control in terms of mortality.
Researchers are looking for a better way to treat people with atrial fibrillation and prevent stroke or systemic embolism (blood clots travelling through the blood stream to plug another vessel). Atrial fibrillation is a condition of having irregular and often rapid heartbeat. It can lead to the formation of blood clots in the heart which can travel through the blood stream to plug another vessel, and like this lead to serious and life-threatening conditions, such as a stroke. A stroke occurs because the brain tissue beyond the blockage no longer receives nutrients and oxygen so that brain cells die. As strokes arising from atrial fibrillation can involve extensive areas of the brain, it is important to prevent them. Blood clots are formed in a process known as coagulation. Medications are already available to prevent the formation of blood clots. When taken by mouth (orally), they are known as oral anticoagulants (OACs) including apixaban. OACs decrease the risk of the above-mentioned serious and life-threatening conditions. The main side effect of OACs is an increase of the risk of bleeding. The study treatment asundexian is a new type of anticoagulant currently under development to provide further treatment options. Asundexian aims to further improve the standard of care with regard to the risk of bleeding. The main purpose of this study is to collect more data about how well asundexian works to prevent stroke and systemic embolism and how safe it is compared to apixaban in people with atrial fibrillation and at high risk for stroke. To see how well the study treatment asundexian works researchers compare: - how long asundexian works well and - how long apixaban works well after the start of the treatment. Working well means that the treatments can prevent the following from happening: - stroke and/or - systemic embolism. The study will keep collecting data until a certain number of strokes or embolisms happen in the study. To see how safe asundexian is, the researchers will compare how often major bleedings occur after taking the study treatments asundexian and apixaban, respectively. Major bleedings are bleedings that have a serious or even life-threatening impact on a person's health. The study participants will be randomly (by chance) assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups, A and B. Dependent on the treatment group, the participants will either take the study treatment asundexian by mouth once a day or apixaban by mouth twice a day for approximately 9 - 33 months. Each participant will be in the study for approximately 9 - 34 months. There will be visits to the study site every 3 to 6 months and up to 7 phone calls. Those participants who do not want or are unable to have visits to the study site may join the study remotely in selected locations. The location name contains the abbreviation - DCT in such cases. During the study, the study team will: - take blood samples - do physical examinations - examine heart health using an electrocardiogram (ECG) - check vital signs such as blood pressure and heart rate - do pregnancy tests - ask the participants questions about their quality of life - ask the participants questions about how they are feeling and what adverse events they are having. An adverse event is any medical problem that a participant has during a study. Doctors keep track of all adverse events that happen in studies, even if they do not think the adverse events might be related to the study treatments.
The DreaMed Endo.Digital is indicated for use by healthcare professionals treating individuals with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) who use insulin pump or multiple daily injections (MDI) as their insulin delivery therapy and monitor their glucose levels by using Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) or Flash Glucose monitoring (FGM), or SMBG above the age of 6 years old and below 30 years. DreaMed Endo.DigitalTM is indicated for use by healthcare professionals when analyzing CGM/SMBG and pump or MDI data to generate recommendations for optimizing a patient's insulin pump settings for basal rate, carbohydrate ratio (CR), and correction factor (CF); or MDI settings for basal rate, carbohydrate ratio (CR), and correction factor (CF) or Sliding Scale without considering the full clinical status of a particular patient. DreaMed Endo.DigitalTM does not replace clinical judgement. The proposed study is an open label, interventional study that will include up to 500 participants with type 1 diabetes using insulin pumps or MDI therapy and monitoring glucose levels by continuous glucose monitoring including flash glucose monitoring or SMBG. The proposed study will be 12 months, therefore will include 5 routine clinic visits. At each visit, participants who use pump therapy will download their pump and glucose data (V1-V5) as they use to do at clinic visit. Participants who use MDI therapy will use the Endo.Digital App for insulin and glucose documentation and will upload data from their CGM/FGM or glucometer as they use to do at clinic visit. In addition, participants will be offered to download data also at home in between study visits, every 3-6 weeks as they feel needed (Phone visits). Each time, optimization of pump settings or MDI will be done according to the downloaded data using the Endo.DigitalTM system. The device recommendations for insulin dosing adjustments and diabetes management tips will be reviewed by the treating physician. Each new treatment settings will be approved or edit by the study physician prior to implementation by the participant. At study completion, glycemic control will be evaluated by measured HbA1c and the data obtained from the participant devices and CGM/glucometer metrics, or Endo.Digital App data for MDI users.
This is an open-label, non-randomized, multicenter, Phase 1/2a study to evaluate the safety and potential efficacy of Allocetra-OTS in the treatment of advanced solid tumor malignancy as monotherapy or in combination with an anti-PD-1 therapy.
Phase 2, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of daxdilimab in patients with active, proliferative lupus nephritis (LN).
Researchers are looking for a better way to treat people who have chronic heart failure. Chronic heart failure is a medical condition with shortness of breath, tiredness and ankle swelling in which the heart does not pump blood as well as it should. BAY2413555 is a new compound which is under development for the treatment of heart failure. Heart failure is a serious disease in which the heart pumps less well. BAY2413555 is expected to protect the heart and improve cardiac function. The main purpose of this study is to learn how safe BAY2413555 is compared to placebo in participants with chronic heart failure and implanted cardiac defibrillator, or cardiac resynchronization devices (ICD/CRT). A placebo is a treatment that looks like a medicine, but does not have any medicine in it. ICD/CRT are machines placed in the body that use an electric shock/impulse to reset the heart or get it beating correctly. To study the safety, the researchers will record all medical problems the participants may have during the study after starting the study treatment. Medical problems that happen after the participants have started their treatment are also known as "treatment emergent adverse events" (TEAEs). The TEAEs will be compared between participants who received BAY2413555 and those who received placebo. The second purpose of this study is to learn whether BAY2413555 effects electrical signals inside the heart compared to placebo. The study has two parts, A and B. Each part will last for two weeks. In part A, the participants will be assigned by chance to either take BAY2413555 as a tablet by mouth once per day or a placebo. Participants from part A who do not need to stop the study based on predefined criteria continue in part B. They will be assigned by chance to receive either the same dose of BAY2413555 as in part A or a higher dose. Participants who have taken placebo in part A will as well be assigned in part B. Each participant will be in the study for approximately 90 days (including the screening period and follow-up period). In the study, participants will take study medication for 28 days. 8 visits to the study site and 1 telephone contact visit are planned. During the study, the study team will: - do physical examinations - check vital signs - examine heart health using ECG - check the participants' ICD/CRT information - take exercise testing - take blood and urine samples - ask the participants questions about how they are feeling about their quality of life - ask the participants questions about how they are feeling and what adverse events they are having. An adverse event is any problem that happens during the trial. Doctors keep track of all adverse events that happen in trials, even if they do not think the adverse events might be related to the study treatments or a study procedure. Participants will be closely monitored during the entire study duration and site personnel will take action to mitigate any negative effect, if any, as appropriate. About 30 days after the participants take their last treatment, the study doctors and their team will check the participants' health.
This study is a Phase 2 multinational, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized (1:1:1), efficacy and safety study of adjunctive EQU-001 for the treatment of focal onset seizures in subjects aged 18 to 65 years, who have been diagnosed with epilepsy according to International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Classification of the Epilepsies 2017 criteria This study is designed to test the efficacy and safety of EQU-001 20 mg and 60 mg as compared with placebo as an add-on anti-seizure medication (ASM) in subjects with uncontrolled focal onset seizures. The treatment portion of the study will be comprised of a 4-week double-blind medication activation period and a 12-week double-blind maintenance period.
This is an open-label study to evaluate safety and potential efficacy of Allocetra-OTS in the treatment of patients with peritoneal metastasis as an add-on to the standard of care (SoC) chemotherapy.