There are about 2333 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Ireland. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The study objective of Period 1 was to compare the safety and efficacy of upadacitinib 15 mg once daily (QD) to abatacept on a background of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) for the treatment of signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD)-inadequate response or bDMARD-intolerant participants with moderately to severely active RA. The study objective of Period 2 is to evaluate the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of upadacitinib 15 mg QD in participants with RA who had completed Period 1.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of selexipag on the physical activity of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in their daily life, by using a wearable wrist device (actigraph). The actigraph will collect data on daily life physical activity in the patient's real environment. In addition, the PAH symptoms and their impacts will be assessed by using an electronic patient reported outcome measure in the patient's real environment. Patients will be assigned randomly to either selexipag or placebo.
A randomised, examiner blind, two treatment arm, stratified, parallel design, single-site study in subjects with at least two sensitive teeth to compare the efficacy of a test dentifrice against that of a control dentifrice in reducing dentinal hypersensitivity.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of ipatasertib plus abiraterone and prednisone/prednisolone compared with placebo plus abiraterone and prednisone/prednisolone in participants with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
- To evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of MIN-101 and its metabolites in extensive (EM) and poor (PM) metabolizers - To evaluate the relationship between plasma levels of MIN-101 and changes in QT/QTcF intervals - To evaluate safety and tolerability of MIN-101.
This was a Phase III, Efficacy and Safety Study of Oleogel-S10 in Participants with Inherited Epidermolysis Bullosa (EB). EB is a rare group of genetic skin fragility disorders characterised by blistering of the skin in response to minor injury. In most cases, onset of EB is at birth or shortly after. All participants affected by any type of EB share the main characteristic of repeatedly developing painful wounds that take days to months to heal. Current treatment of EB is primarily preventative and supportive including protection from mechanical forces by avoiding rubbing, early treatment of wounds to prevent infections, and protection of the wound with adequate non-adhesive dressings to enable healing. The active pharmaceutical ingredient in Oleogel-S10 is a refined birch bark extract, quantified to 72 to 88% betulin. This clinical study of Oleogel-S10 in patients with inherited EB has been carried out to investigate whether Oleogel-S10 is effective for treatment of EB wounds and safe for long-term use. Oleogel-S10 was compared to a control gel. The control gel matched Oleogel-S10 in terms of texture and visual appearance to allow for double-blinding. The packaging for Oleogel-S10 gel and the control gel were identical. The participant received either Oleogel-S10 or control gel for a double-blind study phase of 90 days. The probability that the participant received Oleogel-S10 was 50%, which means that they had a 1 in 2 chance of receiving Oleogel-S10. However, in the follow-up phase of the study all participants were treated with Oleogel-S10 for a period of 24 months. This clinical study was performed at 49 study sites in 26 countries (Argentina, Australia, Austria, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong [China], Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Singapore, Spain, Switzerland, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and the United States); 223 participants participated in total.
To assess if a virtual out patient clinic via a telephone review was an acceptable and safe alternative to a clinic attendance for a broad range of general surgical patients discharged following a hospital admission.
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab plus standard of care (SOC) chemotherapy (etoposide/platinum [EP]) in participants with newly diagnosed extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) who have not previously received systemic therapy for this malignancy. The primary study hypotheses are that pembrolizumab+EP prolongs Progression-free Survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR) and Overall Survival (OS) compared with placebo+EP in adult participants with ES-SCLC. In this study, RECIST 1.1 has been modified to follow a maximum of 10 target lesions and a maximum of 5 target lesions per organ. With protocol Amendment 07 (03-Oct-2018), the outcome measure of "Change from Baseline at Weeks 12 and 24 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale" was replaced with a single time point analysis at Week 18.
This study is designed as a randomized, single blind (data evaluation), placebo controlled, full cross-over study and conducted in 166 (including 10% drop out) males and females, aged ≥ 18 and ≤ 65 and waist circumference of >80 cm for women and >94 cm for men (indicating increased risk of metabolic complications (WHO)) and having a sedentary lifestyle. Subjects will receive rice with a tea extract and rice without a tea extract. There will be three visits to the test facility: one screening visit and two intervention visits. During the intervention visits venous blood samples will be collected for the analysis of plasma glucose (t = -30m, -5m, 15m, 30m, 45m, 1h, 1h 30m, 2h and 3h, relative to the start of rice consumption ) and serum insulin (t = -5m, 30m, 1h, 2h and 3h). Between the two intervention visits subjects have an interval of one week. This interval is required to minimize subject discomfort from repeated blood sampling.
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety, acute and long term effectiveness, during standard RF ablation procedures while using Ablation Index and VISITAG™ software in combination with a Thermocool SmartTouch® (ST) or SmartTouch Surroundflow® (STSF) catheter. Furthermore, the role of Ablation Index and VISITAG™ workflow in creating contiguous ablation lines is assessed. The study is a prospective, non-randomized, post-market clinical evaluation. Up to 330 patients will be included in this study. All patients who qualify based on the study specific requirements will be invited to participate. The total duration of the study is estimated to be about 24 months (12 months enrollment period and 12 months of follow up). The clinical investigation population include subjects undergoing RF ablation for treatment of drug resistant symptomatic paroxysmal AF. Prior to enrollment in the clinical investigation, all subjects must meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria and are suitable candidates for enrollment in a clinical investigation in the opinion of the investigator. Subjects must have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) (Type I or III, including β-blocker) as evidenced by recurrent or are intolerant of the AAD.