There are about 25435 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in United Kingdom. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
This study will assess growth over time and the clinical course of HCH in children by collecting growth measurements and other variables of interest.
Hip fracture injuries are linked with increased morbidity, frailty, and mortality risk. Studies have shown that in hip fracture surgery, early mobilisation confers better pain control, 30-day complication and mortality rates and could reduce in hospital length of stay. Though early mobilisation may provide numerous post operative benefits, there are barriers to achieving this reliably and effectively. One such difficulty is pain. In the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh (RIE) like many boards across Scotland, oral oxycodone has been routinely used as analgesia to help with post operative pain, in patients who have undergone orthopaedic trauma injuries. However, this analgesic modality is utilised to help with general post operative pain, rather than targeted abolition of pain prior to physiotherapy. Alfentanil is a relatively new medication which has a very rapid onset of action and short half life. Alfentanil may prove to be a superior form of analgesia for the purpose of encouraging early mobilisation after hip fracture surgery. This study could provide robust evidence for regular use of alfentanil prior to physiotherapy in early post operative hip fracture surgery patients.
The trial is designed as a randomised, controlled, open, parallel group, multi-centre phase II trial to evaluate clinical efficacy of selinexor in combination with cyclophosphamide and prednisone.
The goal of this crossover study was to learn about the potential regulatory role of serotonin in interoceptive processing and its relationship to levels of state anxiety. This experiment directly compared the impact of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) (20mg CITALOPRAM) to that of a PLACEBO on the neural processing of ordinary interoceptive sensations and the relationship of these influences to anxious states. Healthy young volunteers completed the visceral interoceptive attention task with each treatment condition (citalopram and placebo). The task involves focusing attention on heart, stomach, or visual sensation control while scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The difference in haemodynamic response between interoceptive sensation(s) and visual sensation (i.e. the relative interoceptive response) is compared between treatment conditions. State anxiety is measured at each test period. It is used to test for a moderating effect of state anxiety on the influence of serotonin in interoceptive processing and used post-hoc to explore associations between changes in state anxiety and changes of interoceptive relative interoceptive response due to the SSRI.
The purpose of this study is to compare disease free survival (DFS) in participants with recurrence of papillary-only high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (HR-NMIBC) within 1 year of last dose of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy and who refused or are unfit for Radical Cystectomy (RC), receiving TAR-200 versus investigator's choice of single agent intravesical chemotherapy.
The goal of this clinical trial is to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy of HMB-001 in Participants with Glanzmann Thrombasthenia. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Parts A, B, and C: To determine the safety and tolerability of HMB-001 - Part A: To establish the dose level(s) and dosing interval(s) of HMB-001 to be investigated in Parts B and C - Parts B and C: To estimate the ability of HMB-001 to prevent the number and severity of bleeds Part A will assess differing singular doses of HMB-001 in small groups of participants. The dose administered to a newly enrolled participant (or groups of participants) may only increase if analysis of data from previous dosing shows it is safe to do so. The planned duration of participation in Part A is approximately 6 months, which consists of a Screening Period, an optional Run-in Observation Period, and a follow-up period of 8 weeks. Part B is similar to Part A as it involves testing different dose levels of HMB-001 in small groups of participants. However, in Part B, HMB-001 is given multiple times over a 3-month period, either weekly, every 2 weeks, or every 4 weeks. Part B consists of a Screening Period, a Run-in Observation Period, a 3-month Treatment Period, and a Safety Follow-up following the last dose of HMB-001. Part C is open to participants from Part B and consists of approximately a 9-month Treatment Period and a Safety Follow-up following the last dose of HMB-001.
The goals of this clinical trial are to assess the feasibility of an internet-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) and Motivation Interviewing (MI) intervention for individuals aged 18 to 64 with mild to moderate insomnia, and/or mild anxiety/depression. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Can internet-based CBT-I effectively improve sleep quality and reduce insomnia symptoms? - Can internet-based CBT-I effectively improve sleep efficiency, sleep onset latency (SOL), and wake after sleep onset (WASO)? - Is CBT-I treatment feasible to carry out remotely? What are the percentages of participants who dropped out of the study? - Is internet-based CBT-I financially feasible compared to the traditional CBT-I intervention? Eligible participants would be invited to participate in the research and randomised into two groups: Intervention and Waitlist Control. Both groups will have their baseline Insomnia Severity Index and Sleep Condition Indicator assessed prior to the main part of the research. Participants in the Intervention group will go through 4 CBT-I sessions over the course of 4 weeks. These sessions will be delivered online by trained lay-person coaches, supervised directly by an experienced coach specialising in CBT-I. The Intervention group will also keep a sleep diary. At the end of the intervention, the investigators will interview 10 individuals to learn more about their experiences during the study. Participants in the Waitlist Control Group will receive the same intervention after the end of the study. This group acts as a control for the Intervention group.
Background and study aims Diverticular disease or diverticulosis is a benign disease of the colon. Anatomically this is formation of pockets of bowel wall which protrude through weaknesses in the muscular wall of the colon. The mechanisms leading to their formation remains unclear and is likely a complex interaction of multiple factors. For the majority of people these pockets are incidental findings but for some they can cause symptoms or a segment of colon containing them can become inflamed which is called acute diverticulitis. The main aim of this study is to see if a faecal samples, which will be tested for hidden blood content with a faecal immunochemical test for haemoglobin (FIT), could be used as an alternative to currently used follow-up investigations for patients who have an episode of acute diverticulitis confirmed on a computerised tomography (CT) scan. These are colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy or a special CT called CT colonoscopy. We will also be doing a test called faecal calprotectin which is a marker of bowel inflammation and an assessment of the microbes that live in the bowel to see if this will provide further insights into the diagnosis and treatment of diverticulitis. Who can participate? All patients 18 or over admitted to a participating hospital with acute diverticulitis confirmed on a CT scan and who planned to have one of the currently used follow-up investigations are eligible. What does the study involve? The study will involve taking three stool (faecal) samples using faecal testing kits posted to participants. One is on their first solid stool after diagnosis (or as early as possible if their first solid stool is before receiving this pack), the others are at 3 weeks after diagnosis and then 6 weeks after diagnosis. What are the possible benefits and risks of participating? There are no risks of participating. FIT testing has been used in cancer screening now for a number of years and we hope to demonstrate that a negative FIT test for patients after acute diverticulitis will be able to exclude a bowel cancer and prevent the majority of future patients having invasive and time consuming tests. There no additional benefit for participants for their current episode, as they will still need to have these tests. Where is the study run from? Royal Surrey County Hospital When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for? 09/10/2023-30/09/2024 Who is funding the study? The study is being funded by MATTU (Minimal Access Therapy Training Unit), GUTS (GUTS - Fighting Bowel Cancer) and NHIR (National Institute for Health and Care Research). Who is the main contact? James Norman On the study email rsch.colorectalDfitstudy@nhs.net
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy of OMS906 in patients with C3 Glomerulopathy (C3G) and Idiopathic Immune Complex-Mediated Glomerulonephritis (ICGN)
This is a single arm, prospective, multi-centre study to evaluate the gastrointestinal tolerance and compliance over a 7-day period with a plant based tube feed.