There are about 3961 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Finland. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
This study investigates how to utilize an algorithm-based virtual grid in lung imaging in intensive care unit patients. The aim is to compare the radiation dose caused by imaging with a virtual grid and a traditional grid and relate this to the achieved image quality. The study aims to determine how the radiation dose can be lowered and still obtain the same diagnostic image quality as using a traditional scatter-limiting lattice.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the BCMA-CD3 bispecific antibody elranatamab, alone and/or in combination with the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, daratumumab, can provide more benefit to people with multiple myeloma compared to a combination therapy including daratumumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone. People with multiple myeloma who have received previous treatment including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor will be enrolled in the study. Part 1 of the study will assess the safety and activity of different doses of elranatamab in combination with daratumumab. People participating in Part 2 of the study will be randomly assigned to receive either elranatamab alone, elranatamab plus daratumumab, or daratumumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone. Part 2 will compare the safety and activity of (1) elranatamab alone compared to daratumumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone, and (2) elranatamab plus daratumumab compared to daratumumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone. Participants in all parts of the study will receive study treatment until their disease progresses, they experience unacceptable side effects, or they choose to no longer participate in the study.
Vitamin D intervention effects on the prevention of acute respiratory tract infections among Young Finnish Men
Researchers are looking for a better way to treat people who have chronic kidney disease (CKD), a long-term, progressive decrease in the kidneys' ability to work properly. When CKD happens in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus, a condition characterized by high blood sugar levels, CKD is also referred to as diabetic kidney disease (DKD). FIGARO-BM is an add-on study in which blood draws that were collected in the FIGARO-DKD study are further analyzed. No additional blood draws (also referred to as biological samples) or data will be obtained from the participants, nor will any additional or new study intervention be introduced. No visit or patient contact other than for obtaining the agreement by the patients (also called informed consent) will be required. Inflammation and scarring are both seen as responsible for worsening of chronic kidney disease. There is much information from animal studies that the study treatment finerenone (BAY94-8862) works against inflammation and against scarring (also called fibrosis) in organs such as the kidney. In this exploratory study researchers want to learn more about the study treatment finerenone (BAY94-8862). To find this out, this study will examine substances called biomarkers in blood draws from participants in the FIGARO-DKD study. Biomarkers are used as indicators of biological processes, disease processes or responses to medication. The biomarkers that will be examined stand for inflammation, organ scarring (also called fibrosis), blood vessel function and congestion. The main question of this study is whether there are differences between these biomarkers in the group of participants who received finerenone and the group of participants who received a placebo in the FIGARO-DKD study. A placebo looks like a treatment but does not have any medicine in it. To answer this question, the researchers will compare the levels of these biomarkers between the two groups at different time points after starting the study treatment. Blood samples for this study will be obtained from FIGARO-DKD study sites with a high number of participants who had been treated with finerenone or placebo for at least 24 months. This information will be combined with other information from biomarker examinations already available in the FIGARO-DKD study.
VYF03 is a phase II, randomized, parallel-group prevention study with 2 arms, active-controlled (Stamaril), observer-blind, multi-center study to assess the non-inferiority of the immune response, in terms of seroconversion rates of the investigational vaccine candidate vYF to the licensed Stamaril, in adults aged 18 years up to 60 years in Europe (EU). The safety and immunogenicity profile of vYF in a cohort of Asian population of Chinese origin outside of China will also be described. The study will also assess the immunogenicity profiles and the safety profiles of vYF and Stamaril. Participants will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive a single subcutaneous injection of either the vYF vaccine (380 participants in EU and 80 participants of Chinese origin in Asia) or Stamaril (190 participants in EU and 40 participants of Chinese origin in Asia), on Day 01. The duration of each participant's participation will be approximately 5 years.
The study includes collection of data from patients referred to a therapeutic evaluation in Tays Sydänkeskus Oy (Heart Center Co, Tampere University Hospital) or another unit of Sydänkeskus (hereafter the Heart Hospital) due to suspected cardiac arrhythmia. Data collection takes place outside the hospital in normal daily conditions. The monitoring is started during the outpatient visit at Heart hospital polyclinic or when leaving home from cardiac ward and it continues for 2 days. Reference information about the occurrence of arrhythmia episodes and the reference ECG data are obtained from simultaneously worn Holter device. During the two days the study device and the reference device are worn continuously. Wearing the devices does not affect the daily routines of the participant except there is no possibility to take a shower. The arrhythmia episodes are labelled in post-hoc signal analysis and annotations visually confirmed by a cardiologist. The participants are instructed to take ECG recordings with the wrist device every time the device gives a notification and also whenever the participant feels arrhythmia symptoms. There will be at least four intermittent ECG records taken on each day.
This is a randomized, controlled, parallel, multicenter trial to compare post-operative complications and long-term results between open and laparoscopic technique in emergency colorectal surgery.
The purpose of this study is to assess nivolumab plus relatlimab fixed-dose combination (FDC) versus nivolumab alone in participants with completely resected stage III-IV melanoma.
A retrospective, single-tertiary centre observational study. The study population consists mainly of patients with instrumented posterolateral spine fusion operated at the Department of Neurosurgery or at the Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology in the Turku University Hospital. Also, patients with non-instrumented posterolateral spine fusion, interbody spine fusion, and a combination of posterolateral and interbody spine fusion are included. The approximate number of the above-mentioned operations with BonAlive® putty is 400 - 500 between September 2013 and April 2021. In the operations, the BonAlive® putty was used either alone, together with autologous bone (AB) chips, with milled allogenous bone chips, with demineralized bone matrix (DBM), with other synthetic bone grafts, or with a combination of the above-mentioned.
Primary Objective -To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab compared to omalizumab in reducing the polyp size and improving sense of smell Secondary Objectives - To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab in improving CRSwNP symptoms at Week 24 compared to omalizumab - To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab in improving lung function at Week 24 compared to omalizumab - To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab in improving CRSwNP total symptom score (TSS) at Week 24 compared to omalizumab - To evaluate the effect of dupilumab on health related quality of life (HRQoL) at week 24 compared to omalizumab - To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab in improving nasal peak inspiratory flow at Week 24 compared to omalizumab - To evaluate the effect of dupilumab on CRSwNP overall disease severity at Week 24 compared to omalizumab - To evaluate the effect of dupilumab on asthma control at Week 24 compared to omalizumab - To evaluate the safety of dupilumab and omalizumab