There are about 9403 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Switzerland. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
This is a multicenter, randomized study to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of ABX464 50mg and 25mg administered once daily (QD) as maintenance therapy in subjects with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis who have inadequate response, no response, a loss of response, or an intolerance to either conventional therapies [corticosteroids, immunosuppressant (i.e. azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate)] and/or advanced therapies [biologics (TNF inhibitors, anti-integrins, anti-IL-23), and/or S1P receptor modulators, and/or JAK inhibitors]. This study is the maintenance phase of both previous induction studies ABX464-105 and ABX464-106. All eligible subjects who have completed either one of the induction studies above mentioned, will be given the opportunity to take part in the present ABX464-107 maintenance study and will be randomized to either a double blind, placebo-controlled part (Part #1) or allocated to ABX464 50mg or 25mg open label treatment arms (Part #2) depending on their clinical response at the end of induction. This study consists of a 44-week treatment phase and a 28-days follow-up period consisting in the End of Study (EOS) visit.
This is a two-arm randomized controlled trial with the aim to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of post-operative management after a modified Lapidus arthrodesis with/without an Akin or a Weil/Hohmann surgery fusion with immediate complete weight-bearing compared with partial weight-bearing (10 - 15kg) for 6 weeks as a novel approach for rehabilitation after a foot surgery.
The aim of the SUISSE MPC 2 study is to treat stress urinary incontinence in adult women.
The primary objectives of the study are to evaluate the efficacy of BIIB059 (litifilimab) compared with placebo in reducing skin disease activity measured by the Cutaneous Lupus Activity of Physician's Global Assessment-Revised (CLA-IGA-R) score [Parts A and B (US)] and the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index Activity (CLASI-A) score [Part B (ROW)] in participants with active SCLE and/or CCLE with or without systemic manifestations and refractory and/or intolerant to antimalarials. The secondary objectives of the study are to evaluate the efficacy of BIIB059 in reducing SCLE and/or CCLE disease activity by CLA-IGA-R, CLASI-A; to evaluate additional efficacy parameters of BIIB059 in reducing SCLE and/or CCLE disease activity; safety; tolerability; and immunogenicity of BIIB059 [Parts A and B].
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can cause immune-related adverse events (IrAEs) throughout and beyond treatment duration. These IrAEs can be varied and difficult to predict, as they can involve almost any organ, regardless of where the primary tumor is located. Treatment modality and individual characteristics appear to influence the frequency and severity of these events, which can become serious without proper monitoring and timely intervention. Generally, patient visits are scheduled at the same intervals in which patients receive treatment, once every two to four weeks. In these large intervals, patients can be surprised by IrAEs without a close schedule visit to their oncology physician. Not only this may negatively influence their overall well-being, their perceived self-efficacy to manage their own condition and their health-related quality of life may be affected as well. Using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to monitor patient symptoms has become incredibly valuable in describing treatment toxicity, including that of ICIs. PROs are a self-report of the patient's own perceptions of their health status. Using their own words, or by replying to questionnaires, patients can convey symptoms and how these affect their daily life and quality of life. Questionnaires are an example of a PRO measure (PROM), which have increasingly been provided electronically (resulting in electronic PROs or ePROs). The ubiquity of connected electronic devices has enabled long-distance monitoring of symptoms through electronic questionnaires. In patients treated with chemotherapy, studies have shown that using this method to collect symptom data can enable healthcare providers to help patients manage their symptoms remotely. This allows patients to receive timely support from home, that could help prevent serious complications that could entail visits to the emergency department, unscheduled hospitalizations and treatment interruptions. The IePRO study's aim is to test a model of care that uses electronic questionnaires to monitor symptoms that could be related to the use of ICIs. Patients would reply to these questionnaires at least once a week using an electronic web application (on their phone or computer). A team of oncology nurses reviews their replies and calls patients when new symptoms appear or when they worsen. Using a standard triage algorithm, the nurses guide patients on how to proceed: if they should stay home and follow self-care advice, if they should have a second call within the next 24 hours to follow-up on their symptoms, or if they should come to the hospital for an in-person assessment as soon as possible. In this study, it is hypothesized that this model of care could lead to an earlier detection of IrAEs, as well as their improved management by reducing the number of high-severity IrAEs, the number of unscheduled emergency admissions and hospitalizations, as well as decreasing the number of treatment interruptions and of immunosuppressive treatments used to treat IrAEs.
The Micra MC1VR01 or Micra AVMC1AVR1 Transcatheter Pacing System (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) has become a major breakthrough as an alternative to standard transvenous pacemakers. The aim of this multi-center study is to assess the clinical outcomes of patients implanted with Micra LLPM in real life, in different clinical scenarios.
The primary aim of the SwissNeuroFoundation AneurysmDataBase Project is to implement information technology based tools to create and use a holistic reference database specific to intracranial aneurysms (IA). The SwissNeuroFoundation AneurysmDataBase are concerned with generating the data with which to populate this database. The purpose for populating the database are to: - Screen for and evaluate markers of risk for intracranial aneurysm formation and aneurysm rupture. Are considered as markers the following: genetics factors, microbiota, environmental factors, congenital factors (ie: cerebrovascular anatomical variants), transcriptomics signature, proteomics signature,shape characteristics, haemodynamics characteristics. - Screen for and evaluate prognostic factors of outcome regarding different management strategies including watchful observation, microsurgical treatment, endovascular treatment or any combination thereof. - Implement and evaluate patient-specific management protocols integrating all available information. - Evaluate the impact of the database and use of tools to improve care, reduce costs, support knowledge discovery and promote new industrial developments.
4-bromo-2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine (2C-B) is a psychoactive substance with reportedly similar acute effects to both the prototypical empathogen 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, Ecstasy) and the classic psychedelic substance psilocybin (contained in "magic, hallucinogenic mushrooms"). Pharmacologically, MDMA mainly releases serotonin (5-HT) via the serotonin transporter (SERT) and psilocybin mainly acts as direct agonist at 5-HT2A receptors. 2C-B interacts with both the 5-HT2A receptor and SERT which is in line with its reported mixed effects profile. However, scientific studies are lacking. There is an increased interest in psychiatric research on the therapeutic properties of MDMA and psilocybin and also on mixed empathogenic-psychedelic substances.
This study is to improve the understanding of the role of postural and ambulatory biomechanics for symptoms in patients with sLSS and to correlate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) with dynamic compensation (difference between static and dynamic sagittal spinal alignment) in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis sLSS).
This study's purpose is to measure the treatment response from efgartigimod PH20 SC compared with placebo in participants with Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy (IIM). Participants with the IIM subtypes of dermatomyositis (DM), immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM), or certain other subtypes of polymyositis (PM; including antisynthetase syndrome [ASyS]) will be included in the study. Treatment response will be measured by Total improvement score (TIS). Additional information can be found on https://myositis-study.com/.