There are about 13446 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Belgium. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The main purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of volrustomig compared to observation in participants with unresected locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) who have not progressed after receiving definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT).
During this project, the investigators want to explore in vitro changes in basal cells and the crosstalk with residing immune cells as potential pathogenic mechanisms in CRSwNP vs healthy controls by using surgically resected patient samples.
This is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of KarXT in male and female subjects who are aged 55 to 90 years and have mild to severe Alzheimer's Disease (AD) with moderate to severe psychosis related to AD. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of KarXT compared with placebo in the treatment of subjects with psychosis associated with AD as measured by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Clinician (NPI-C): Hallucinations and Delusions (H+D) score.
The purpose of this study is to learn about the safety and effects of the study medicine called vepdegestrant. The safety and effects of vepdegestrant will be see when given with other medicines. Vepdegestrant is studied to see if it can be a possible treatment for advanced metastatic breast cancer. This type of cancer would have spread from where it started (breast) to other parts of the body and would be tough to treat. The study is seeking for participants who have breast cancer that: - is hard to treat (advanced) and may have spread to other organs (metastatic). is sensitive to hormonal therapy (it is called estrogen receptor positive). - is no longer responding to treatments taken before starting this study. This study is divided into separate sub-studies. For Sub-Study C: All the participants will receive vepdegestrant and a medicine called samuraciclib. Vepdegestrant and samuraciclib will be taken once in a day by mouth. The medicines will be taken at home. The experience of people receiving the study medicines will be studied. This will help see if the study medicine is safe and effective. Participant will continue to take vepdegestrant and samuraciclib until: - their cancer is no longer responding, or - side effects become too severe. They will have visits at the study clinic about every 4 weeks.
Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a common inflammatory skin disease, which represents a major public health issue in industrialized countries. ACD is induced by repeated contact of individuals with environmental chemicals and is characterized by a delayed type IV hypersensitivity response with skin inflammation mediated by allergen-specific T cells in sensitized individuals. The current diagnosis is based on clinical examination, assessment of environmental exposures and patch testing. Although the robustness of patch tests has long been established, this method can sometimes give inconclusive results, leading to problems in disease management. Preliminary results indicate that the molecular analysis of Patch-Tests (PT) reactions could allow a more reliable diagnosis. Importantly, this gene profiling approach may help to identify patients with false positive PT reactions, i.e. patients whose PT reactions did not show any "allergy signature". However, it remains to be demonstrated that the presence or absence of allergy biomarkers in PT lesions are indeed predictive of ACD response in patients. The main objective is to describe the correlation between these molecular signatures and the reactivity of individuals when they are exposed to allergenic compounds under conditions of use (using ROAT test).
The purpose of this study is to assess the initial safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of the novel BliStim occipital nerve field stimulation therapy for the prevention of chronic cluster headaches. This is a prospective, first in human study.
The purpose of this study is to estimate the oral bioavailability of 3 new formulations of PF-07817883 (test) relative to reference tablet formulation in healthy adult participants under fasted conditions. The study will also assess the safety and tolerability of test and reference tablet formulations in healthy adult participants.
The intention of the study is to demonstrate superiority of Saruparib (AZD5305) + physician's choice NHA relative to placebo + physician's choice NHA by assessment of radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) in participants with mCSPC.
The beach chair position is the most commonly used position during shoulder surgery and offers the surgeon numerous advantages over the lateral decubitus position. However, the beach chair position can also lead to hemodynamic changes, including hypotension and cerebral hypoperfusion. It is therefore the anesthesiologist's job to prevent hypotension during the procedure. The Acumen Hypotension Predictor Index or HPI for short is a software program that can predict the occurrence of low blood pressure during surgery shortly before it occurs. Studies have already demonstrated the effectiveness of HPI in various operations, where hypotension is defined as a mean arterial blood pressure < 65mmHg for at least 1 minute. To our knowledge, the low blood pressure prediction index has not yet been investigated for the prevention of low blood pressure in shoulder surgery in the beach chair position. The HPI is built into a monitor that is switched on in addition to the standard monitoring for monitoring blood pressure, pulse, saturation, among other things. The monitor gives a signal when an episode of low blood pressure will occur within 15 minutes. This gives the anesthesiologist the opportunity to anticipate in time so that the occurrence of low blood pressure can be avoided. Goal The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the HPI in predicting and reducing the incidence of hypotension during shoulder surgery in the beach chair position. Procedure A total of 144 patients will participate in this study. Patients will be randomized to the intervention group or the control group according to a 1:1 allocation. In addition to standard monitoring, the HPI monitor will be turned on for all patients. For patients in the control group, the HPI monitor screen will be blinded and the alarms muted. Patients between 18 and 85 years of age with a BMI ≤ 40 kg/m2 undergoing elective shoulder surgery are eligible for the study.
Study goal: The goal of this prospective head to head comparison is to evaluate the effectiveness of [18F]-MFBG PET in assessing cardiac innervation, comparing it with [123I]-MIBG SPECT The study's primary focus is on distinguishing between Parkinson's disease (PD) and multiple system atrophy (MSA), as well as between dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Main questions: - Feasibility: How well can [18F]-MFBG PET detect changes in myocardial uptake in PD and DLB compared to the expected normal values in healthy individuals and AD and MSA-P patients? How well can it differentiate between these groups based on the detected changes? - Non-inferiority: Is [18F]-MFBG PET as accurate as [123I]-MIBG SPECT in distinguishing between PD and MSA-P, and between DLB and AD? Participant requirements: For the main study, participants will be required to visit the hospital for 3 or 4 appointments. During these visits, they will undergo a screening visit, MRI brain scan, a comprehensive neurological assessment, [18F]-PE2I PET, [123I]-MIBG SPECT, and [18F]-MFBG PET scans. Additionally, a separate dosimetry study will be conducted, involving healthy subjects who will visit the hospital for a screening visit and undergo [18F]-MFBG PET scans.