There are about 10342 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Australia. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The primary purpose is to determine the safety and tolerability of belantamab mafodotin in combination with other anti-cancer treatments (in each sub-study), and to establish the recommended Phase 2 dose for each combination treatment to explore in the cohort expansion phase. This study is the sub study of the Master protocol (NCT04126200).
The primary purpose of this sub study is to assess the safety, tolerability and determine recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of GSK3901961 in HLA A*02:01, HLA-A*02:05 and/or HLA A*02:06 positive participants with New York esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (NY ESO 1) and/or Cancer testis antigen 2 (LAGE 1a) positive previously treated metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and previously treated, advanced (metastatic or unresectable) Synovial Sarcoma/ Myxoid/Round Cell Liposarcoma SS/MRCLS.
To assess the safety, tolerability and determine recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of GSK3845097 in HLA-A*02:01, HLA-A*02:05 and/or HLA-A*02:06 positive participants with New York esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (NY-ESO)-1 and/or Cancer testis antigen 2 (LAGE-1a) positive, previously treated, advanced (metastatic or unresectable) Synovial Sarcoma (SS) and Myxoid/Round Cell Liposarcoma (MRCLS).
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple intravenous doses of BWC0977 when administered to healthy adult volunteers.
This study aims to investigate the treatment preferences of patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors (NETS) and nurses who are involved in the care of individuals with NETs. NETs are a type of abnormal growth that can develop in various parts of the body, such as the lungs, pancreas, gastrointestinal tract, or other organs. NETs originate from specialized cells called neuroendocrine cells, which are responsible for producing hormones in our bodies. The study focuses on hypothetical preferences regarding the use of two different type of devices for administering Somatostatin analogues (SSAs), which could be used in the treatment of NETs. SSAs work by imitating the actions of a hormone called somatostatin that naturally exists in our bodies. These treatment help to control the symptoms of NETs by blocking the release of hormones from the tumor cells. The devices under consideration are a motorized injector versus a manual injector. Participants in the study will be asked to take part in: 1. An interview based on a draft survey: 60-minute interview over videocall, to examine participants understanding of the online survey; or 2. Final online survey: 30-minute online survey. This involves presenting patients and nurses with different treatment options and asking them to choose their preferred option. By analysing the choices made by participants, researchers can understand which attributes of the injector devices are most important to patients and nurses. Individual participation is limited to the interview based on a draft survey (60 minutes) or the final online survey (30 minutes). No further participation is required beyond this.
This will be a Phase 1, single-center, 2-part study in healthy subjects. Parts 1 and 2 need to be conducted in sequential order.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about PUR1900 as an inhaled, antifungal therapeutic for the treatment of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) in patients with asthma. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Is PUR1900 safe and well tolerated in adults with asthma and ABPA? 2. Is there an effect of daily administration of PUR1900 on potential outcome measures in adults with asthma and ABPA? 3. Is there fungal resistance to A. fumigatus? This study includes a 28-day screening period, a 112-day (16-week) treatment period, and a 56-day (8 week) observation period. Participants will take either 40mg of PUR1900, 20 mg of PUR1900 or Placebo for 112 days and complete an eDairy, answer questions about their asthma and complete peak respiratory flow measurements at home. They will come to the clinic approximate once a month during the treatment period and complete study assessments. At the end of the observation period participants will complete one more clinic visit. Participants who complete this study may be given the opportunity to continue on study drug in an open label extension study.
Researchers are looking for a better way to treat people with atrial fibrillation and prevent stroke or systemic embolism (blood clots travelling through the blood stream to plug another vessel). Atrial fibrillation is a condition of having irregular and often rapid heartbeat. It can lead to the formation of blood clots in the heart which can travel through the blood stream to plug another vessel, and like this lead to serious and life-threatening conditions, such as a stroke. A stroke occurs because the brain tissue beyond the blockage no longer receives nutrients and oxygen so that brain cells die. As strokes arising from atrial fibrillation can involve extensive areas of the brain, it is important to prevent them. Blood clots are formed in a process known as coagulation. Medications are already available to prevent the formation of blood clots. When taken by mouth (orally), they are known as oral anticoagulants (OACs) including apixaban. OACs decrease the risk of the above-mentioned serious and life-threatening conditions. The main side effect of OACs is an increase of the risk of bleeding. The study treatment asundexian is a new type of anticoagulant currently under development to provide further treatment options. Asundexian aims to further improve the standard of care with regard to the risk of bleeding. The main purpose of this study is to collect more data about how well asundexian works to prevent stroke and systemic embolism and how safe it is compared to apixaban in people with atrial fibrillation and at high risk for stroke. To see how well the study treatment asundexian works researchers compare: - how long asundexian works well and - how long apixaban works well after the start of the treatment. Working well means that the treatments can prevent the following from happening: - stroke and/or - systemic embolism. The study will keep collecting data until a certain number of strokes or embolisms happen in the study. To see how safe asundexian is, the researchers will compare how often major bleedings occur after taking the study treatments asundexian and apixaban, respectively. Major bleedings are bleedings that have a serious or even life-threatening impact on a person's health. The study participants will be randomly (by chance) assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups, A and B. Dependent on the treatment group, the participants will either take the study treatment asundexian by mouth once a day or apixaban by mouth twice a day for approximately 9 - 33 months. Each participant will be in the study for approximately 9 - 34 months. There will be visits to the study site every 3 to 6 months and up to 7 phone calls. Those participants who do not want or are unable to have visits to the study site may join the study remotely in selected locations. The location name contains the abbreviation - DCT in such cases. During the study, the study team will: - take blood samples - do physical examinations - examine heart health using an electrocardiogram (ECG) - check vital signs such as blood pressure and heart rate - do pregnancy tests - ask the participants questions about their quality of life - ask the participants questions about how they are feeling and what adverse events they are having. An adverse event is any medical problem that a participant has during a study. Doctors keep track of all adverse events that happen in studies, even if they do not think the adverse events might be related to the study treatments.
A Multi-Centre, Randomised, Controlled, Masked Phase 2 Study of the Safety and Efficacy of KIO-101 Ophthalmic Solution, versus Vehicle Control in the treatment of Dry Eye Disease in Patients with Autoimmune Disease
The main purpose of this study is to assess is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MK-1942 as adjunctive therapy in participants with mild to moderate Alzheimer's Disease (AD) dementia.