Coronary Artery Disease Clinical Trial
— STARTERSOfficial title:
Simulator Training to Improve Interventional Cardiologist Skills (STARTERS) Trial
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if simulator-based training will improve interventional cardiology fellows' skills and will improve patient outcomes. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Does this training improve specific operative parameters recorded during initial coronary interventions performed as first operators under senior supervision? - Will major and minor procedural complications be reduced after simulator-based training? Interventional cardiology fellows in their first year of training will be randomized between standard master-apprentice training or simulator-based training before starting their cath lab period. They will be supervised during their cath lab period as first operators by senior interventional cardiologists. During their first 50 procedures performed as supervised first operator, specific procedural data will be collected.
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 400 |
Est. completion date | November 15, 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | November 15, 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Specializing doctors who are about to start dedicated training in the interventional cardiology room - Patients who must undergo coronary angiography examination. Exclusion Criteria: Specializing doctors: - No interest in performing interventional cardiology procedures as first supervised operator (classical training) - Experience as first supervised operator in interventional cardiology procedures - Absence of informed consent Patients: - Acute Coronary Syndrome - Severe left ventricular dysfunction with ejection fraction less than 30% - Severe chronic renal failure (with glomerular filtration rate less than 30 ml/min) - Absence of informed consent |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Italy | Fondazione Policlinico Univrsitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS | Rome |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS |
Italy,
Aggarwal S, Choudhury E, Ladha S, Kapoor PM, Kiran U. Simulation in cardiac catheterization laboratory: Need of the hour to improve the clinical skills. Ann Card Anaesth. 2016 Jul-Sep;19(3):521-6. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.185548. — View Citation
Joshi A, Wragg A. Simulator Training in Interventional Cardiology. Interv Cardiol. 2016 May;11(1):70-73. doi: 10.15420/icr.2016.11.1.70. — View Citation
Pezel T, Coisne A, Bonnet G, Martins RP, Adjedj J, Biere L, Lattuca B, Turpeau S, Popovic B, Ivanes F, Lafitte S, Deharo JC, Bernard A. Simulation-based training in cardiology: State-of-the-art review from the French Commission of Simulation Teaching (Commission d'enseignement par simulation-COMSI) of the French Society of Cardiology. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 Jan;114(1):73-84. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2020.10.004. Epub 2021 Jan 5. — View Citation
Popovic B, Pinelli S, Albuisson E, Metzdorf PA, Mourer B, Tran N, Camenzind E. The Simulation Training in Coronary Angiography and Its Impact on Real Life Conduct in the Catheterization Laboratory. Am J Cardiol. 2019 Apr 15;123(8):1208-1213. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.01.032. Epub 2019 Jan 24. — View Citation
Sciahbasi A, Romagnoli E, Trani C, Burzotta F, Pendenza G, Tommasino A, Leone AM, Niccoli G, Porto I, Penco M, Lioy E. Evaluation of the "learning curve" for left and right radial approach during percutaneous coronary procedures. Am J Cardiol. 2011 Jul 15;108(2):185-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.03.022. Epub 2011 Apr 29. — View Citation
Voelker W, Petri N, Tonissen C, Stork S, Birkemeyer R, Kaiser E, Oberhoff M. Does Simulation-Based Training Improve Procedural Skills of Beginners in Interventional Cardiology?--A Stratified Randomized Study. J Interv Cardiol. 2016 Feb;29(1):75-82. doi: 10.1111/joic.12257. Epub 2015 Dec 16. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Mean total fluoroscopy radiation time (expressed in seconds) | Difference in Mean total fluoroscopy radiation time, during the periods where the cardiology fellows act as primary operators, between groups | End of procedure | |
Secondary | Mean arterial cannulation time (expressed in seconds) | Difference in mean coronary cannulation time is considered as the time from sheath insertion to first right and left selective coronary angiography obtained (expressed in minutes) | End of procedure | |
Secondary | Total radiation dose (expressed in cGy*cm2) | Difference in total radiation dose adsorbed by patients as evaluated by dose-area product (DAP) (expressed in Gycm2) | End of procedure | |
Secondary | Total contrast dose (expressed in ml) | Difference in total contrast dose administered to the patients | End of procedure | |
Secondary | Failure to achieve arterial cannulation (e.g.: rate of failure for each partecipant) | Difference in failure to achieve arterial cannulation | End of procedure | |
Secondary | Failure to achieve right coronary cannulation (e.g.: rate of failure for each partecipant) | Difference in failure to achieve right coronary cannulation | End of procedure | |
Secondary | Failure to achieve left coronary cannulation (e.g.: rate of failure for each partecipant) | Difference in failure to achieve left coronary cannulation | End of procedure | |
Secondary | Number of catheters used | Difference in number of catheters used to complete the diagnostic procedure | End of procedure | |
Secondary | Any major or minor procedural and clinical complication | Difference in any major or minor complication occurred during the procedure or the index hospitalization | Up to the end of index hospitalization or date of death from any cause (we collect any kind of clinical or procedural complication occuring during the determined period) |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT06030596 -
SPECT Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification for Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease Determined by Fraction Flow Reserve
|
||
Completed |
NCT04080700 -
Korean Prospective Registry for Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Distal Radial Approach (KODRA)
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03810599 -
Patient-reported Outcomes in the Bergen Early Cardiac Rehabilitation Study
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06002932 -
Comparison of PROVISIONal 1-stent Strategy With DEB Versus Planned 2-stent Strategy in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions.
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06032572 -
Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the VRS100 System in PCI (ESSENCE)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05308719 -
Nasal Oxygen Therapy After Cardiac Surgery
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04242134 -
Drug-coating Balloon Angioplasties for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04556994 -
Phase 1 Cardiac Rehabilitation With and Without Lower Limb Paddling Effects in Post CABG Patients.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05846893 -
Drug-Coated Balloon vs. Drug-Eluting Stent for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Large Coronary Artery Disease
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06027788 -
CTSN Embolic Protection Trial
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05023629 -
STunning After Balloon Occlusion
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04941560 -
Assessing the Association Between Multi-dimension Facial Characteristics and Coronary Artery Diseases
|
||
Completed |
NCT04006288 -
Switching From DAPT to Dual Pathway Inhibition With Low-dose Rivaroxaban in Adjunct to Aspirin in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01860274 -
Meshed Vein Graft Patency Trial - VEST
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06174090 -
The Effect of Video Education on Pain, Anxiety and Knowledge Levels of Coronary Bypass Graft Surgery Patients
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT03959072 -
Cardiac Cath Lab Staff Radiation Exposure
|
||
Completed |
NCT03968809 -
Role of Cardioflux in Predicting Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Outcomes
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05065073 -
Iso-Osmolar vs. Low-Osmolar Contrast Agents for Optical Coherence Tomography
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04566497 -
Assessment of Adverse Outcome in Asymptomatic Patients With Prior Coronary Revascularization Who Have a Systematic Stress Testing Strategy Or a Non-testing Strategy During Long-term Follow-up.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05096442 -
Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Genoss® DCB and SeQuent® Please NEO in Korean Patients With Coronary De Novo Lesions
|
N/A |