Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Active, not recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05515666 |
Other study ID # |
2020-ZX68 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Active, not recruiting |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
April 1, 2021 |
Est. completion date |
December 2022 |
Study information
Verified date |
August 2022 |
Source |
China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
ECG is one of the classic tests for coronary artery disease, but patients with coronary
artery disease often have no onset of typical symptoms at the time of consultation, so it is
difficult to capture ischemic changes on a conventional ECG. In this study, a diagnostic test
was performed to assess the diagnostic value of wearable ECG for coronary artery disease,
with the gold standard of coronary angiography and quantitative flow fraction. In addition,
we followed up with the enrolled participants for 1 year to assess the relationship between
wearable ECG and long-term prognosis.
Description:
Background: Patients with suspected coronary artery disease usually have symptoms such as
angina, shortness of breath, and fatigue during daily life. But they may have no typical
symptom when they arrived at the hospital. If routine examinations and laboratory tests such
as electrocardiogram and cardiac markers cannot support the diagnosis of coronary heart
disease, patients often need coronary computed tomography angiography or hospitalization for
coronary angiography. This advanced diagnostic imaging has several shortcomings such as
radiation exposure, long time for the appointment, certain requirements for patient's
physical condition (such as exercise ability, good liver and kidney function, etc.),
corresponding mental stress and economic burden to the patient. Therefore, for patients with
suspected coronary artery disease but cannot be diagnosed by routine examinations, new
diagnostic methods that are both safe, accurate, and economical are needed.
Aims: This project intends to assess the diagnostic value of wearable electrocardiograms for
coronary artery disease. Patients will take the device home and actively record the
electrocardiogram at symptoms onset. The data will be uploaded to the diagnostic center and
read by professional cardiologists. The results will be compared with coronary angiography to
test its diagnostic efficacy. It is hoped that the diagnosis efficiency of coronary artery
disease and patients' experience can be improved.
Operating Procedures:
1. Baseline information was collected from subjects who met the inclusion criteria,
including demographic information such as gender and age, chief complaints and past
history, outpatient blood pressure values, 12-lead ECG results, baseline results of the
wearable ECG, and hematological test results such as myocardial enzyme profile tests.
The technician conducts patient education to ensure that subjects are clear about the
requirements for use of the wearable ECG and how to upload it, know the process of home
monitoring, and reserve contact information for both doctors and patients.
2. Participants lived a normal life at home and used the wearable ECG to collect an ECG
once a day in the early morning. If symptoms related to coronary artery diseases, such
as chest tightness and chest pain, occur at home, the ECG is recorded immediately using
the wearable ECG, and a simple complaint of the attack is selected on the corresponding
mobile app and uploaded to the cloud data center. The ECG can be collected and uploaded
several times during the onset of symptoms without removing the wearable ECG, and then
again after the symptoms have disappeared. If the subject's symptoms do not subside or
even worsen during the period, or if the subject feels that he/she needs medical
attention, he/she should go to our center or to the nearest hospital for medical
treatment in a timely manner. The uploaded ECG will be interpreted by the ECG physician
at the diagnostic center for abnormalities.
3. Diagnostic criteria of wearable ECG for myocardial ischemia.
① ST-segment depression of horizontal or inferior type ≥ 0.1 mV (1.0 mm), lasting ≥ 1.0
min, with an interval of ≥ 5.0 min between episodes. a significant increase/slowing of
the mean heart rate during the episode compared to 10-30 min before the episode (20
beats/min increase or 10 beats/min decrease is recommended as the diagnostic reference
cut point), or the concomitant presence ② ST-segment elevation showing ischemic J waves
with duration ≥ 1.0 min and the interval between episodes ≥ 5.0 min. The mean heart rate
during the episode is significantly increased/decreased compared with 10-30 min before
the episode (an increase of 20 beats/min or a decrease of 10 beats/min is recommended as
the diagnostic reference cut point) or accompanied by arrhythmias.
③ Ischemic evolution of the ST-T on a transient or intermittent basis in the monitoring
of the ECG is clinically significant.
4. When the participants were admitted to the hospital, the preoperative examination was
first completed to clarify that there were no contraindications to coronary
intervention, then coronary angiography was performed and quantitative flow fraction
(QFR) was measured, and the need for revascularization treatment was judged by the
operator during the intervention. The criteria for the diagnosis of coronary artery
disease are QFR ≤ 0.8 in at least one coronary stenosis lesion, or decreased blood flow
in the lesion with stenosis ≥ 90% of the vessel diameter. Subjects without meaningful
stenosis on coronary angiography were required to undergo loading myocardial perfusion
imaging to evaluate microvascular lesions.
5. Follow-up: The end of follow-up is 1 year after hospital discharge. During this period,
four follow-up visits were conducted by telephone or outpatient at 30 days, 3 months, 6
months, and 12 months after the subjects were discharged from the hospital. The
follow-up visits included major cardiovascular adverse events (all-cause death, total
myocardial infarction, stroke, target vessel revascularization, etc.),
rehospitalization, and cardiac-related diseases and treatment.
Statistics: The diagnostic results of the wearable ECG were compared with those of QFR, and
sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive
likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio, compliance rate, and 95% confidence interval
corresponding to each index were calculated. The significance level of the statistical test
was taken as 5% bilaterally.