Coronary Artery Disease Clinical Trial
— iLITROOfficial title:
Concordance Between FFR and iFR for the Assessment of Intermediate Lesions in the Left Main Coronary Artery. A Prospective Validation of a Default Value for iFR (iLITRO Study)
Verified date | February 2024 |
Source | Fundación EPIC |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Observational [Patient Registry] |
The assessment of Left Main Coronary Artery (LMCA) lesions by means of coronary angiography renders serious limitations. Studies with a limited number of patients have shown that a value of FFR (Fractional Flow Reserve) above 0.80 identify a low risk of events in case of not performing revascularization in patients with intermediate stenosis in the LMCA. Although iFR (Instant wave Free Ratio) has recently been found equivalent to FFR The demonstration of the prognostic utility of iFR in patients with LMCA intermediate lesions could have an important clinical impact and justify its systematic use for the treatment decision in these high-risk patients.
Status | Active, not recruiting |
Enrollment | 300 |
Est. completion date | November 30, 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | June 30, 2025 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Patients with intermediate lesion in the LMCA (25-60% angiographic stenosis) by visual estimation) in which the realization of a study with guide of pressure for the determination of the iFR. - Patients aged =18 years. - Patients able of giving informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: - Patients with indication for coronary surgery regardless of the significance of the LMCA lesion. - Patients with a LMCA lesion presenting with ulceration, dissection or thrombus. - Patients with previous arterial or venous graft lesion functioning in the territory irrigated by the LMCA (LMCA protected). - Patients with ACS (Acute Coronary Syndrome) with a potentially guilty lesion in the LMCA. - Patients unable to obtain informed consent. - Patients with known terminal illness that conditions a life expectancy less than 1 year. - Patients with hemodynamic instability with Killip III or IV class. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Spain | Hospital General Universitario de Albacete | Albacete | |
Spain | Hospital Universitario de Badajoz | Badajoz | |
Spain | Hospital Universitari Germans Trias I Pujol de Badalona | Badalona | |
Spain | Hospital Clinic I Provincial de Barcelona | Barcelona | |
Spain | Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau | Barcelona | |
Spain | Hospital Del Mar | Barcelona | |
Spain | Hospital Universitari Bellvitge | Barcelona | |
Spain | Hospital Universitari Vall D'Hebron | Barcelona | |
Spain | Hospital Universitario Puerto Real | Cadiz | |
Spain | Hospital General Universitario de Santa Lucia de Cartagena | Cartagena | Murcia |
Spain | Hospital General Universitario de Castellón | Castellón De La Plana | Valencia |
Spain | Hospital General de Ciudad Real | Ciudad Real | |
Spain | Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia | Córdoba | |
Spain | Hospital Clinico Universitario Virgen de La Arrixaca | El Palmar | Murcia |
Spain | Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo | Galdakao | Vizcaya |
Spain | Hospital Universitario de Cabueñes | Gijón | |
Spain | Hospital Universitari Doctor Josep Trueta | Girona | |
Spain | Hospital Universitario Virgen de Las Nieves | Granada | |
Spain | Hospital General Juan Ramón Jiménez | Huelva | |
Spain | Hospital de León | León | |
Spain | Hospital Universitari Lucus Agusti | Lugo | |
Spain | Clinica Universitaria de Navarra | Madrid | |
Spain | Hospital Clinico San Carlos | Madrid | |
Spain | Hospital de La Princesa | Madrid | |
Spain | Hospital Universitario de La Paz | Madrid | |
Spain | Hospital Universitario Virgen de La Victoria | Málaga | |
Spain | Hospital de Merida | Mérida | |
Spain | Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias | Oviedo | |
Spain | Hospital Universitario de Donostia | San Sebastián | |
Spain | Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla | Santander | |
Spain | Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela | Santiago De Compostela | |
Spain | Hospital Universitari Joan Xxiii de Tarragona | Tarragona | |
Spain | Hospital Universitari Mutua de Terrassa | Terrassa | Barcelona |
Spain | Hospital Universitario Virgen de La Salud | Toledo | |
Spain | Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia | Valencia | |
Spain | Hospital Universitari I Politecnic La Fe | Valencia | |
Spain | Hospital Universitario Alvaro Cunqueiro | Vigo | |
Spain | Hospital Clinico Universitario Lozano Blesa | Zaragoza |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Fundación EPIC |
Spain,
Authors/Task Force members; Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, Collet JP, Cremer J, Falk V, Filippatos G, Hamm C, Head SJ, Juni P, Kappetein AP, Kastrati A, Knuuti J, Landmesser U, Laufer G, Neumann FJ, Richter DJ, Schauerte P, Sousa Uva M, Stefanini GG, Taggart DP, Torracca L, Valgimigli M, Wijns W, Witkowski A. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 1;35(37):2541-619. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278. Epub 2014 Aug 29. No abstract available. — View Citation
Davies JE, Sen S, Dehbi HM, Al-Lamee R, Petraco R, Nijjer SS, Bhindi R, Lehman SJ, Walters D, Sapontis J, Janssens L, Vrints CJ, Khashaba A, Laine M, Van Belle E, Krackhardt F, Bojara W, Going O, Harle T, Indolfi C, Niccoli G, Ribichini F, Tanaka N, Yokoi H, Takashima H, Kikuta Y, Erglis A, Vinhas H, Canas Silva P, Baptista SB, Alghamdi A, Hellig F, Koo BK, Nam CW, Shin ES, Doh JH, Brugaletta S, Alegria-Barrero E, Meuwissen M, Piek JJ, van Royen N, Sezer M, Di Mario C, Gerber RT, Malik IS, Sharp ASP, Talwar S, Tang K, Samady H, Altman J, Seto AH, Singh J, Jeremias A, Matsuo H, Kharbanda RK, Patel MR, Serruys P, Escaned J. Use of the Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI. N Engl J Med. 2017 May 11;376(19):1824-1834. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1700445. Epub 2017 Mar 18. — View Citation
De Bruyne B, Baudhuin T, Melin JA, Pijls NH, Sys SU, Bol A, Paulus WJ, Heyndrickx GR, Wijns W. Coronary flow reserve calculated from pressure measurements in humans. Validation with positron emission tomography. Circulation. 1994 Mar;89(3):1013-22. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.89.3.1013. — View Citation
de la Torre Hernandez JM, Baz Alonso JA, Gomez Hospital JA, Alfonso Manterola F, Garcia Camarero T, Gimeno de Carlos F, Roura Ferrer G, Recalde AS, Martinez-Luengas IL, Gomez Lara J, Hernandez Hernandez F, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Cequier Fillat A, Perez de Prado A, Gonzalez-Trevilla AA, Jimenez Navarro MF, Mauri Ferre J, Fernandez Diaz JA, Pinar Bermudez E, Zueco Gil J; IVUS-TRONCO-ICP Spanish study. Clinical impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance in drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary disease: pooled analysis at the patient-level of 4 registries. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Mar;7(3):244-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.09.014. — View Citation
de la Torre Hernandez JM, Hernandez Hernandez F, Alfonso F, Rumoroso JR, Lopez-Palop R, Sadaba M, Carrillo P, Rondan J, Lozano I, Ruiz Nodar JM, Baz JA, Fernandez Nofrerias E, Pajin F, Garcia Camarero T, Gutierrez H; LITRO Study Group (Spanish Working Group on Interventional Cardiology). Prospective application of pre-defined intravascular ultrasound criteria for assessment of intermediate left main coronary artery lesions results from the multicenter LITRO study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Jul 19;58(4):351-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.064. — View Citation
Gotberg M, Christiansen EH, Gudmundsdottir IJ, Sandhall L, Danielewicz M, Jakobsen L, Olsson SE, Ohagen P, Olsson H, Omerovic E, Calais F, Lindroos P, Maeng M, Todt T, Venetsanos D, James SK, Karegren A, Nilsson M, Carlsson J, Hauer D, Jensen J, Karlsson AC, Panayi G, Erlinge D, Frobert O; iFR-SWEDEHEART Investigators. Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio versus Fractional Flow Reserve to Guide PCI. N Engl J Med. 2017 May 11;376(19):1813-1823. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1616540. Epub 2017 Mar 18. — View Citation
Hamilos M, Muller O, Cuisset T, Ntalianis A, Chlouverakis G, Sarno G, Nelis O, Bartunek J, Vanderheyden M, Wyffels E, Barbato E, Heyndrickx GR, Wijns W, De Bruyne B. Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided treatment in patients with angiographically equivocal left main coronary artery stenosis. Circulation. 2009 Oct 13;120(15):1505-12. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.850073. Epub 2009 Sep 28. — View Citation
Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, Boersma E, Bech JW, van't Veer M, Bar F, Hoorntje J, Koolen J, Wijns W, de Bruyne B. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 May 29;49(21):2105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.087. Epub 2007 May 17. — View Citation
Sen S, Escaned J, Malik IS, Mikhail GW, Foale RA, Mila R, Tarkin J, Petraco R, Broyd C, Jabbour R, Sethi A, Baker CS, Bellamy M, Al-Bustami M, Hackett D, Khan M, Lefroy D, Parker KH, Hughes AD, Francis DP, Di Mario C, Mayet J, Davies JE. Development and validation of a new adenosine-independent index of stenosis severity from coronary wave-intensity analysis: results of the ADVISE (ADenosine Vasodilator Independent Stenosis Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Apr 10;59(15):1392-402. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.003. Epub 2011 Dec 7. — View Citation
Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van' t Veer M, Klauss V, Manoharan G, Engstrom T, Oldroyd KG, Ver Lee PN, MacCarthy PA, Fearon WF; FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 15;360(3):213-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807611. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Assessment correlation between FFR>=0.80 and iFR >=0.89 | Efficacy and correlation of two invasive indexes of functional assessment by intracoronary pressure guidance in intermediate lesions of the LMCA with a cut-off point to defer the treatment of FFR> = 0.80 (with intravenous adenosine) and iFR > = 0.89. the LMCA. | 1 day | |
Primary | Major Adverse Cardiac Events | Composite of death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularisation | 30 days | |
Primary | Major Adverse Cardiac Events | Composite of death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularisation | 1 year | |
Primary | Major Adverse Cardiac Events | Composite of death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularisation | 5 years | |
Secondary | Assessment correlation between iFR and IVUS | Assessment correlation between iFR and IVUS derived minimal luminal area | 5 years | |
Secondary | Death (all cause) | Death (all cause) | 30 days, 1 and 5 years | |
Secondary | Death (cardiovascular) | Death (cardiovascular) | 30 days, 1 and 5 years | |
Secondary | Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction | Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction | 30 days, 1 and 5 years | |
Secondary | Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction related to the LMCA lesion | Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction related to the LMCA lesion | 30 days, 1 and 5 years | |
Secondary | Revascularization | Revascularization | 30 days, 1 and 5 years | |
Secondary | Revascularization of the target lesion | Revascularization of the target lesion | 30 days, 1 and 5 years | |
Secondary | Myocardial Infarction related to target lesion revascularization | Myocardial Infarction related to target lesion revascularization | 30 days, 1 and 5 years | |
Secondary | Stent Thrombosis in the target lesion revascularization | Stent Thrombosis in the target lesion revascularization | 30 days, 1 and 5 years | |
Secondary | Restenosis of the stent in target lesion | Restenosis of the stent in target lesion | 30 days, 1 and 5 years | |
Secondary | New revascularization of the target lesion | New revascularization of the target lesion | 30 days, 1 and 5 years |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT06030596 -
SPECT Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification for Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease Determined by Fraction Flow Reserve
|
||
Completed |
NCT04080700 -
Korean Prospective Registry for Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Distal Radial Approach (KODRA)
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03810599 -
Patient-reported Outcomes in the Bergen Early Cardiac Rehabilitation Study
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06002932 -
Comparison of PROVISIONal 1-stent Strategy With DEB Versus Planned 2-stent Strategy in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions.
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06032572 -
Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the VRS100 System in PCI (ESSENCE)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05308719 -
Nasal Oxygen Therapy After Cardiac Surgery
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04242134 -
Drug-coating Balloon Angioplasties for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04556994 -
Phase 1 Cardiac Rehabilitation With and Without Lower Limb Paddling Effects in Post CABG Patients.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05846893 -
Drug-Coated Balloon vs. Drug-Eluting Stent for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Large Coronary Artery Disease
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06027788 -
CTSN Embolic Protection Trial
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05023629 -
STunning After Balloon Occlusion
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04941560 -
Assessing the Association Between Multi-dimension Facial Characteristics and Coronary Artery Diseases
|
||
Completed |
NCT04006288 -
Switching From DAPT to Dual Pathway Inhibition With Low-dose Rivaroxaban in Adjunct to Aspirin in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01860274 -
Meshed Vein Graft Patency Trial - VEST
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06174090 -
The Effect of Video Education on Pain, Anxiety and Knowledge Levels of Coronary Bypass Graft Surgery Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03968809 -
Role of Cardioflux in Predicting Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Outcomes
|
||
Terminated |
NCT03959072 -
Cardiac Cath Lab Staff Radiation Exposure
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04566497 -
Assessment of Adverse Outcome in Asymptomatic Patients With Prior Coronary Revascularization Who Have a Systematic Stress Testing Strategy Or a Non-testing Strategy During Long-term Follow-up.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05065073 -
Iso-Osmolar vs. Low-Osmolar Contrast Agents for Optical Coherence Tomography
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT05096442 -
Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Genoss® DCB and SeQuent® Please NEO in Korean Patients With Coronary De Novo Lesions
|
N/A |