Coronary Artery Disease Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Multicenter Randomized Trial to Compare the Graft Patency Between No-Touch Vein Harvesting Technique and Conventional Approach in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: the PATENCY Study
This study evaluates the short-term patency of vein graft harvested by the No-Touch technique compared to that by the conventional approach in patients undergoing isolated on-pump/off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. a total of at least 2000 patients undergoing isolated on-pump/off-pump CABG will be consecutively recruited from 7 hospitals across China and randomly assigned to receive No-Touch saphenous vein harvesting or conventional approach. All participants will be invited for clinical follow-up and 64-slice multislice computed tomography angiography (MSCTA) analysis at 3 months post-operatively.
CABG is still the treatment of choice for ischemic heart disease. However, restenosis or
occlusion may occur to graft vessels, leading to postoperative myocardial ischemia and
subsequent clinical events. Long-term angiographic follow-up demonstrated that vein graft
restenosis and occlusion are common among those receiving CABG, with a vein graft patency of
less than 50% at 15 years postoperatively. Besides, it is found that graft occlusion may
occur as early as 3 months after the surgery. It is, therefore, a major priority to improve
the short-term postoperative vein graft patency so as to achieve better prognosis for
patients.
Saphenous vein, the currently most frequently used graft material, occupies over 70% of all
graft vessels.
Multiple factors may contribute to the early restenosis or occlusion of the vein grafts,
including anastomosis technique, graft vessel quality, target lesion site and degree of
stenosis, perioperative coagulating function, etc. The No-Touch technique focuses on
saphenous vein graft harvesting, featured by preserving the surrounding tissue of the vein
while at the same time avoiding manual distension. This technique has been reported
associated with better short and long-term vein graft patency. However, these results mostly
came from small-scale, single-center studies, therefore could hardly be recognized as
high-level evidence for generalization of the technique.
This prospective multi-center study aims to compare the short-term saphenous vein graft
patency harvested by the No-Touch technique and the conventional approach. This study will
consecutively enroll 2000 patients undergoing isolated on-pump/off-pump CABG in 7 hospitals
of China. After obtaining informed written consent, participants will be randomly allocated
to either the No-Touch harvesting or conventional approach group. At baseline, participants
will be interviewed to collect detailed information about on demographics, socioeconomic
status, cardiovascular risk factors, clinical characteristics, treatments, in-hospital
outcomes, general and disease-specific quality of life, function and mental status. During
the follow-ups, the investigators will collect information about clinical outcomes events,
long-term treatments, function, quality of life, symptoms, and medical care during the
recovery period. All participants will be invited for 64-slice multi-slice computed
tomography angiography (MSCTA) analysis at 3 months post-operatively for graft patency
evaluation.
The patients, data adjudicators and CT reviewers will be blinded to the study. Due to the
nature of this study, the operating surgeons, anesthetists and other operative room staff
will not be blind in this study.
By comparing the short-term graft patency between the No-Touch and conventional vein
harvesting groups, this study will contribute major evidence of the possible superiority of
this technique, so as to improve patient outcomes after CABG surgery.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT06030596 -
SPECT Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification for Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease Determined by Fraction Flow Reserve
|
||
Completed |
NCT04080700 -
Korean Prospective Registry for Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Distal Radial Approach (KODRA)
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03810599 -
Patient-reported Outcomes in the Bergen Early Cardiac Rehabilitation Study
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06002932 -
Comparison of PROVISIONal 1-stent Strategy With DEB Versus Planned 2-stent Strategy in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions.
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06032572 -
Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the VRS100 System in PCI (ESSENCE)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05308719 -
Nasal Oxygen Therapy After Cardiac Surgery
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04242134 -
Drug-coating Balloon Angioplasties for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04556994 -
Phase 1 Cardiac Rehabilitation With and Without Lower Limb Paddling Effects in Post CABG Patients.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05846893 -
Drug-Coated Balloon vs. Drug-Eluting Stent for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Large Coronary Artery Disease
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06027788 -
CTSN Embolic Protection Trial
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05023629 -
STunning After Balloon Occlusion
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04941560 -
Assessing the Association Between Multi-dimension Facial Characteristics and Coronary Artery Diseases
|
||
Completed |
NCT04006288 -
Switching From DAPT to Dual Pathway Inhibition With Low-dose Rivaroxaban in Adjunct to Aspirin in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01860274 -
Meshed Vein Graft Patency Trial - VEST
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06174090 -
The Effect of Video Education on Pain, Anxiety and Knowledge Levels of Coronary Bypass Graft Surgery Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03968809 -
Role of Cardioflux in Predicting Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Outcomes
|
||
Terminated |
NCT03959072 -
Cardiac Cath Lab Staff Radiation Exposure
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05065073 -
Iso-Osmolar vs. Low-Osmolar Contrast Agents for Optical Coherence Tomography
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04566497 -
Assessment of Adverse Outcome in Asymptomatic Patients With Prior Coronary Revascularization Who Have a Systematic Stress Testing Strategy Or a Non-testing Strategy During Long-term Follow-up.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05096442 -
Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Genoss® DCB and SeQuent® Please NEO in Korean Patients With Coronary De Novo Lesions
|
N/A |