Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02527616
Other study ID # DIAS-001-FFR
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received August 5, 2015
Last updated December 13, 2016
Start date May 2016
Est. completion date November 2016

Study information

Verified date December 2016
Source Diasolve Ltd
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority United Kingdom: Research Ethics CommitteeUnited Kingdom: Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This is a single-blinded, randomised, crossover investigation comparing the investigational device using intra-coronary (IC) Adenosine infusion to the standard intra-venous (IV) infusion method used for obtaining FFR measurements. All subjects requiring on a clinical basis a pressure wire assessment of intermediate coronary artery stenosis(es) will be eligible to take part in the investigation.


Description:

Coronary artery disease is the most common type of heart disease that affects millions of people worldwide. It is caused by a narrowing or blocking of the arteries (known as stenosis) due to plaque, which restricts blood flow and reduces the amount of oxygen to the heart.

Over the past decade, fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement has been increasingly used in cardiac catheterization laboratories, providing a straightforward and readily available quantitative assessment of the functional severity of a coronary artery stenosis, as the ability of the cardiologist to discriminate between stenoses that can cause ischemia and those that are physiologically insignificant on the basis of coronary angiography alone is limited.

Measuring FFR determines the ratio between the maximum achievable blood flow in a diseased or narrowed coronary artery and the maximum blood flow in a normal coronary artery. This ratio represents the potential decrease in coronary flow distal to the coronary stenosis.

FFR is easily measured during routine coronary angiography by using a pressure wire to calculate the ratio between the coronary pressure distal to a stenosis or a diseased segment and the aortic pressure under conditions of maximum myocardial hyperemia. An FFR of 1.0 is widely accepted as normal. An FFR lower than 0.80 is generally considered to be associated with coronary ischemia and widely accepted in favour of revascularization over conservative management.

The current standard methods of measuring FFR is to insert a pressure wire into the coronary artery while the hyperaemic agent, normally adenosine, is delivered by continuous intravenous infusion via a central femoral vein, a large ante-cubital peripheral cannula or intra-coronary bolus injection.

The investigational device in this clinical investigation is an FFR catheter being developed by Diasolve Limited; a UK based medical device development company. The FFR catheter is a combined pressure wire and hyperaemic agent delivery catheter, which allows simultaneous delivery of a pressure wire and administration of the hyperaemic agent directly into the coronary ostium or most proximal section of the coronary artery, when performing a FFR measurement using currently available pressure wire systems such as Pressure Wire Certus or Prestige from St Jude Medical.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 41
Est. completion date November 2016
Est. primary completion date November 2016
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

1. Ability and willingness to give written informed consent prior to investigation participation.

2. Has given consent to undergo hospital's diagnostic or interventional coronary procedure.

3. Male and female subjects aged 18 and over.

4. Ability to communicate well with the investigator and to comply with the requirements of the clinical investigation.

Prior to randomisation:

1. Coronary angiogram demonstrates at least one coronary stenosis of intermediate severity (40-70%), in a non-infarct related artery, which requires FFR measurement for physiological assessment.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Known sensitivity to adenosine or any of its excipients

2. Technically inaccessible stenosis(es)

3. Acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)

4. Haemodynamically unstable

5. Presence of any clinically significant medical condition as determined by the investigator

6. Participation in another clinical investigation within the three months prior.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety Study, Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Subject), Primary Purpose: Diagnostic


Intervention

Device:
FFR Infusion Microcatheter and standard intra-venous (IV) infusion
Cross-over design where FFR is measured twice in the same lesion using standard standard intra-venous (IV) infusion and new method

Locations

Country Name City State
United Kingdom Northwick Park Hospital Harrow Middx

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Diasolve Ltd

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United Kingdom, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Number of participants with comparable FFR ratio recordings The FFR ratio should remain constant when measured by the standard method and the investigational device. Intraoperative No
Secondary Number of participants with Adverse Events Participants should not experience any additional adverse events during FFR ratio measurement using the investigational device than they do using the standard method. Intraoperative Yes
Secondary Dose of adenosine administered. Maximum hyperaemia may be achieved with a reduced dose of adenosine using the FFR Catheter. Intraoperative No
Secondary Time to onset of maximum hyperaemia. Maximum hyperaemia may be achieved faster using the FFR Catheter Intraoperative No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT06030596 - SPECT Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification for Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease Determined by Fraction Flow Reserve
Completed NCT04080700 - Korean Prospective Registry for Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Distal Radial Approach (KODRA)
Recruiting NCT03810599 - Patient-reported Outcomes in the Bergen Early Cardiac Rehabilitation Study N/A
Recruiting NCT06002932 - Comparison of PROVISIONal 1-stent Strategy With DEB Versus Planned 2-stent Strategy in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions. N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06032572 - Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the VRS100 System in PCI (ESSENCE) N/A
Recruiting NCT04242134 - Drug-coating Balloon Angioplasties for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions N/A
Recruiting NCT05308719 - Nasal Oxygen Therapy After Cardiac Surgery N/A
Completed NCT04556994 - Phase 1 Cardiac Rehabilitation With and Without Lower Limb Paddling Effects in Post CABG Patients. N/A
Recruiting NCT05846893 - Drug-Coated Balloon vs. Drug-Eluting Stent for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Large Coronary Artery Disease N/A
Recruiting NCT06027788 - CTSN Embolic Protection Trial N/A
Recruiting NCT05023629 - STunning After Balloon Occlusion N/A
Completed NCT04941560 - Assessing the Association Between Multi-dimension Facial Characteristics and Coronary Artery Diseases
Completed NCT04006288 - Switching From DAPT to Dual Pathway Inhibition With Low-dose Rivaroxaban in Adjunct to Aspirin in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Phase 4
Completed NCT01860274 - Meshed Vein Graft Patency Trial - VEST N/A
Recruiting NCT06174090 - The Effect of Video Education on Pain, Anxiety and Knowledge Levels of Coronary Bypass Graft Surgery Patients N/A
Completed NCT03968809 - Role of Cardioflux in Predicting Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Outcomes
Terminated NCT03959072 - Cardiac Cath Lab Staff Radiation Exposure
Recruiting NCT04566497 - Assessment of Adverse Outcome in Asymptomatic Patients With Prior Coronary Revascularization Who Have a Systematic Stress Testing Strategy Or a Non-testing Strategy During Long-term Follow-up. N/A
Recruiting NCT05065073 - Iso-Osmolar vs. Low-Osmolar Contrast Agents for Optical Coherence Tomography Phase 4
Completed NCT05096442 - Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Genoss® DCB and SeQuent® Please NEO in Korean Patients With Coronary De Novo Lesions N/A