Acrobat Coronary Stent System Effectiveness European Study

Coronary Artery Disease Clinical Trial

— ACES  

Official title:

Acrobat Coronary Stent System Effectiveness European Study (European Multicenter Effectiveness Randomized Study of Svelte Medical Systems Acrobat Stent on a Wire Compared to Other BMS PCI in de Novo Coronary Lesions) ACES Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Terminated

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT01761591
• Other study ID #: Svelte_13-002
• Secondary ID: ID RCB: 2012-A00
• Status: Terminated
• Phase: N/A
• First received: December 12, 2012
• Last updated: August 25, 2014
• Start date: December 2012
• Est. completion date: January 2014

Study information

• Verified date: August 2014
• Source: Svelte Medical Systems Europe
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: France: Institutional Ethical CommitteeBelgium: Ethics CommitteeSpain: Comité Ético de Investigación Clínica
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to demonstrate the clinical benefit and impact on resource utilization of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) with the Svelte Acrobat Stent System compared to any other CE marked bare metal stent (BMS) implantable via direct stenting or after lesion pre-dilation, in patients with coronary lesions that are eligible for direct stenting and who are recruited and treated so as to reflect real-life routine practice.

Description:

The main objectives of this study are to test the following hypotheses:

1. The evaluated stent is clinically non-inferior to control BMS in terms of freedom of MACE

2. The evaluated stent is clinically beneficial compared to control BMS by reducing exposure to radiations, amount of contrast medium administered, procedure time, as well as amount of administered heparin,

3. The evaluated stent does not result in more frequent adverse events than control BMS,

4. The evaluated stent improves direct stenting success while not decreasing procedural success compared to control BMS.

5. Resource utilization (R.U.):

1. Hospital-perspective resource utilization during the index admission and index procedure is not greater with evaluated the stent and potentially lower than with control BMS

2. Resource utilization over a 6-month time-horizon, in relation to routine follow-up and MACE, is not greater with the evaluated stent than with control BMS.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Terminated
• Enrollment: 300
• Est. completion date: January 2014
• Est. primary completion date: January 2014
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Eligible for PCI and demonstrating native vessel or vein/arterial graft disease

• symptomatic CAD: either stable angina pectoris (CCS 1, 2, 3 pr 4) or unstable (Braunwald Class 1-3, B-C) or positive functional ischemia study

• Male and post-menopausal female

• Patient provides written informed consent prior to procedure

• Patient willing to comply with protocol

• Acceptable candidate for CABG

• Patient indicated for stenting of one or more de novo stenotic lesions in native coronary arteries or bypass grafts with or without direct stenting

• All target lesions for stenting in single or multi-vessel disease meet all inclusion criteria

• None of the lesions requires stenting with Drug eluting stents

• At least one lesion is visually estimated to be candidate for direct stenting

• All target lesions for stenting have a visually estimatd RVD >= 2.5 mm and <= 3.5 mm

• All target lesions for stenting are visually estimated to have LL =< 20 mm (to cover the lesion with 1 stent)

• All target lesions for stenting visually estimated to have a stenosis > 50% and < 99%

• All target lesions for stenting are ACS lesions TIMI flow >= 1

Exclusion Criteria:

• Currently enrolled in another clinical trial that has not completed the primary endpoint or that clinically interferes with the current study endpoints

• A previous coronary procedure within 30 days

• Any of the target lesion(s) requires treatment with a device other than PTCA prior to stent placement (such as, but not limited to, directional coronary atherectomy, excimer laser, rotational atherectomy, etc.)

• Previous BMS deployment anywhere in the target vessel within the past 6 months

• Any DES deployment anywhere in the target vessel within the past 9 months

• Any previous stent placement within 10 mm (proximal or distal) of the target lesion

• Patient has diabetes mellitus

• Co-morbid condition(s) that could limit the patient's participation or impact the trial

• Documented LVEF < 30% at the most recent evaluation

• Evidence of AMI within 72 hours of the intended trial procedure and/or with TIMI flow 0

• History of CVA or TIA in the last 6 months

• Leukopenia (<3.5 x 10^9/L)

• Neutropenia (<1000/mm3) <= 3 days prior to enrollment

• Thrombocytopenia (<10^5/mm3) pre-procedure

• Active peptic ulcer or active GI bleeding

• History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or inability to accept blood transfusions

• Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, heparin or bivalirudin, clopidogrel or ticlopidine, cobalt, nickel, L-605 Cobalt chromium alloy or sensitivity to contrast media, which cannot be adequately pre-medicated

• Serum creatinine level > 2.5 mg per dl within 7 days prior to index procedure

• In-stent restenosis

• Patient not able to give consent or read or write or protected by law or under guardianship or deprived of civil rights

• Woman of childbearing age

• Patient not covered by health or social insurance

• Unprotected left main CAD with obstruction > 50% , not protected by at least one non-obstructed bypass graft to the LAD or left circumflex (LCX) artery or their branches

• Target vessel exhibiting multiple lesions > 40% diameter stenosis outside of a range of 5 mm proximal and distal to the target lesion(s) to be stented based on visual estimate or on-line QCA

• Any target lesion for stenting exhibits an intraluminal thrombus (occupying > 50% of the true lumen diameter) at any time

• Any target lesion for stenting is excessively tortuous (two bends > 90° to reach the target lesion)

• Lesion location that is aorto-ostial or within 5 mm of the origin of the LAD or LCX

• Any target lesion for stenting is has side branches > 2.0 mm in diameter in which bifurcation stenting is planned

• Any target lesion >20 mm

• Any target lesion totally occluded (CTO)

• Any target lesion has TIMI flow = 0

• Any target lesion with ISR

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Coronary Artery Disease
• Coronary Disease
• Myocardial Ischemia

Intervention

Device:
• PCI with Svelte Acrobat
Percutaneous coronary intervention with Svelte Acrobat Coronary Stent System
• PCI with other BMS
Percutaneous coronary intervention with any other routine use CE marked bare metal stent (BMS) implantable either via direct stenting or after lesion pre-dilation

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Belgium	OLV Ziekenhuis	Aalst
Belgium	ZNA Middelheim - Hartcentrum	Antwerpen
Belgium	ZOL Sint Jan	Genk
Belgium	CHU Liège - Sart Tilman	Liège
France	CHU Nord Grenoble - A. Michalon	La Tronche
France	AP-HP Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou	Paris
France	AP-HP La Pitié Salpétrière	Paris
France	CHU Bordeaux Sud - Hôpital Cardiologique Haut Lévêque	Pessac
France	Clinique St Hilaire	Rouen
France	CHU Rangueil	Toulouse
France	Clinique Pasteur	Toulouse
Spain	Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebrón	Barcelona

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Svelte Medical Systems Europe

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

Belgium,  France,  Spain, 

References & Publications (3)

de Ribamar Costa J, Abizaid A, Stella P, Fernandez A, Granada J, Feres F, Serruys P. Preliminary results of the svelte trial: first-in-man assessment of the novel acrobat™ SOAW (Stent-On-A-Wire) coronary system. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(14s1):E1658-E1658. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(11)61658-6

Piscione F, Piccolo R, Cassese S, Galasso G, D'Andrea C, De Rosa R, Chiariello M. Is direct stenting superior to stenting with predilation in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention? Results from a meta-analysis of 24 randomised controlled trials. Heart. 2010 Apr;96(8):588-94. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2009.183277. Review. — View Citation

Shao C, Stella PR, Agostoni P. Complex made easy: left anterior descending artery trifurcation lesion completely treated with a single device. J Invasive Cardiol. 2012 Aug;24(8):E164-6. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	resource utilization	Resource utilization (R.U.) endpoints: Overall procedural and follow-up R.U. including: Man-time; Facility usage; Amount of medical devices and drugs used: during index procedure; after index procedure until discharge; between discharge and 6-month follow-up	6 months	No
Primary	Proportion of patients free of Major Adverse Cardiac Event ("MACE-free patients")	Major Adverse Cardiac Event ("MACE") is defined here as device-oriented composite endpoint that includes, in hierarchical order: Cardiac death (All deaths are considered cardiac unless an unequivocal non-cardiac cause can be established), Myocardial Infarction ("MI"), Target Lesion Revascularization ("TLR").	From the date and time of randomization until 6 months after the index procedure	No
Secondary	administered dye	Volume (ml) of administered dye i.e. injected radiological contrast medium.	intra-procedural	No
Secondary	procedure duration	Procedure duration (minutes) from arterial access to closure.	intra-procedural	No
Secondary	radiation exposure	Radiation exposure (gY/cm²) & total fluoroscopy time (min)	intra-procedural	No
Secondary	acute success	Acute success is measured at procedure end according to 4 criteria: Lesion success: Residual stenosis of the target lesion < 30% of the RVD using any percutaneous method.; Direct stenting success: Lesion success without unplanned pre-dilation performed (planned pre-dilation is an exclusion criterion) from the trial.; Device Success: Direct stenting success without post-dilatation or with post-dilatation using the Stent Delivery System (SDS).; Procedure success: Lesion success & no in-hospital MACE	procedure to discharge	No
Secondary	heparin administration	Amount of heparin administered during the procedure	intra-procedural	No
Secondary	adverse events	Adverse events occurrence: Death; MI; Repeat coronary revascularization; Bleeding or vascular complications at discharge; Stent thrombosis up to 6 months; Other serious adverse events	6 months	Yes

External Links

•   Manufacturer & product information