Coronary Artery Disease Clinical Trial
— ABSORB-IIIOfficial title:
A Clinical Evaluation of Absorb™ BVS, the Everolimus Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold in the Treatment of Subjects With de Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions.
NCT number | NCT01751906 |
Other study ID # | 10-392 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | December 2012 |
Est. completion date | October 2020 |
Verified date | January 2021 |
Source | Abbott Medical Devices |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The ABSORB III RCT is a prospective randomized, single-blind, multi-center trial. It is the pivotal trial to support the US pre-market approval (PMA) of Absorb™ Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold (BVS). The ABSORB III includes additional two trials i.e. ABSORB III PK (pharmacokinetics) sub-study and ABSORB IV RCT trial which are maintained under one protocol because both trial designs are related, ABSORB IV is the continuation of ABSORB III and the data from ABSORB III and ABSORB IV will be pooled to support the ABSORB IV primary endpoint. Both the trials will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Absorb BVS.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 2008 |
Est. completion date | October 2020 |
Est. primary completion date | September 2016 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | General Inclusion Criteria: 1. Subject must be at least 18 years of age. 2. Subject or a legally authorized representative must provide written Informed Consent prior to any study related procedure, per site requirements. 3. Subject must have evidence of myocardial ischemia (e.g., stable, unstable angina, post-infarct angina or silent ischemia) suitable for elective PCI. Subjects with stable angina or silent ischemia and < 70% diameter stenosis must have objectives sign of ischemia as determined by one of the following, echocardiogram, nuclear scan, ambulatory ECG or stress ECG). In the absence of noninvasive ischemia, fractional flow reserve (FFR) must be done and indicative of ischemia. 4. Subject must be an acceptable candidate for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. 5. Female subject of childbearing potential who does not plan pregnancy for up to 1 year following the index procedure. For a female subject of childbearing potential a pregnancy test must be performed with negative results known within 7 days prior to the index procedure per site standard. 6. Female subject is not breast-feeding at the time of the screening visit and will not be breast-feeding for up to 1 year following the index procedure. 7. Subject agrees to not participate in any other investigational or invasive clinical study for a period of 1 year following the index procedure. Angiographic Inclusion Criteria: 1. One or two de novo target lesions: 1. If there is one target lesion, a second non-target lesion may be treated but the non-target lesion must be present in a different epicardial vessel, and must be treated first with a successful, uncomplicated result prior to randomization of the target lesion. 2. If two target lesions are present, they must be present in different epicardial vessels and both must satisfy the angiographic eligibility criteria. 3. The definition of epicardial vessels means the LAD, LCX and RCA and their branches. Thus, the patient must not have lesions requiring treatment in e.g. both the LAD and a diagonal branch. 2. Target lesion(s) must be located in a native coronary artery with a visually estimated or quantitatively assessed %DS of = 50% and < 100% with a TIMI flow of = 1 and one of the following: stenosis = 70%, an abnormal functional test (e.g., fractional flow reserve, stress test), unstable angina or post-infarct angina. 1. Lesion(s) must be located in a native coronary artery with RVD by visual estimation of = 2.50 mm and = 3.75 mm. 2. Lesion(s) must be located in a native coronary artery with length by visual estimation of = 24 mm. 3. For Lead-In subjects with 3.0x18 mm Absorb BVS: lesions (s) must be located in a native coronary artery with RVD by visual estimation of = 2.75 mm and = 3.25 mm. The lesion length by visual estimation is = 8 mm and = 14 mm. General Exclusion Criteria: 1. Any surgery requiring general anesthesia or discontinuation of aspirin and/or an ADP antagonist is planned within 12 months after the procedure. 2. Subject has known hypersensitivity or contraindication to device material and its degradants (everolimus, poly (L-lactide), poly (DL-lactide), lactide, lactic acid) and cobalt, chromium, nickel, platinum, tungsten, acrylic and fluoro polymers that cannot be adequately pre-medicated. Subject has a known contrast sensitivity that cannot be adequately pre-medicated. 3. Subject has known allergic reaction, hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin; or to clopidogrel and prasugrel and ticagrelor; or to heparin and bivalirudin, and therefore cannot be adequately treated with study medications. 4. Subject had an acute myocardial infarction (AMI; STEMI or NSTEMI) within 72 hours of the index procedure and both CK and CK-MB have not returned to within normal limits at the time of index procedure; or subject with stable angina or silent ischemia has CK-MB that is greater than normal limits at the time of the index procedure. 5. Subject is currently experiencing clinical symptoms consistent with new onset AMI (STEMI or NSTEMI), such as nitrate-unresponsive prolonged chest pain with ischemic ECG changes. 6. Subject has a cardiac arrhythmia as identified at the time of screening for which at least one of the following criteria is met: 1. Subject requires coumadin or any other agent for chronic oral anticoagulation. 2. Subject is likely to become hemodynamically unstable due to their arrhythmia. 3. Subject has poor survival prognosis due to their arrhythmia. 7. Subject has a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 30% assessed by any quantitative method, including but not limited to echocardiography, MRI, Multiple-Gated Acquisition (MUGA) scan, contrast left ventriculography, PET scan, etc. LVEF may be obtained within 6 months prior to the procedure for subjects with stable CAD. For subjects presenting with ACS, LVEF must be assessed during the index hospitalization (which may include during the index procedure by contrast left ventriculography) but prior to randomization in order to confirm the subject's eligibility. 8. Subject has undergone prior PCI within the target vessel during the last 12 months. Prior PCI within the non-target vessel or any peripheral intervention is acceptable if performed anytime >30 days before the index procedure, or between 24 hours and 30 days before the index procedure if successful and uncomplicated. 9. Subject requires future staged PCI either in target or non-target vessels or subject requires future peripheral interventions < 30 days after the index procedure 10. Subject has received any solid organ transplants or is on a waiting list for any solid organ transplants. 11. At the time of screening, the subject has a malignancy that is not in remission. 12. Subject is receiving immunosuppressant therapy or has known immunosuppressive or severe autoimmune disease that requires chronic immunosuppressive therapy (e.g., human immunodeficiency virus, systemic lupus erythematosus, etc.). Note: corticosteroids are not included as immunosuppressant therapy. 13. Subject has previously received or is scheduled to receive radiotherapy to a coronary artery (vascular brachytherapy), or the chest/mediastinum. 14. Subject is receiving or will require chronic anticoagulation therapy (e.g., coumadin, dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban or any other agent for any reason). 15. Subject has a platelet count < 100,000 cells/mm3 or > 700,000 cells/mm3. 16. Subject has a documented or suspected hepatic disorder as defined as cirrhosis or Child-Pugh = Class B. 17. Subject has renal insufficiency as defined as an estimated GFR < 30 ml/min/1.73m2 or dialysis at the time of screening. 18. Subject is high risk of bleeding for any reason; has a history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy; has had a significant gastro-intestinal or significant urinary bleed within the past six months. 19. Subject has had a cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic neurological attack (TIA) within the past six months, or any prior intracranial bleed, or any permanent neurologic defect, or any known intracranial pathology (e.g. aneurysm, arteriovenous malformation, etc.). 20. Subject has extensive peripheral vascular disease that precludes safe 6 French sheath insertion. Note: femoral arterial disease does not exclude the patient if radial access may be used. 21. Subject has life expectancy < 5 years for any non-cardiac cause or cardiac cause. 22. Subject is in the opinion of the Investigator or designee, unable to comply with the requirements of the study protocol or is unsuitable for the study for any reason. This includes completion of Patient Reported Outcome instruments. 23. Subject is currently participating in another clinical trial that has not yet completed its primary endpoint. 24. Subject is part of a vulnerable population who, in the judgment of the investigator, is unable to give Informed Consent for reasons of incapacity, immaturity, adverse personal circumstances or lack of autonomy. This may include: Individuals with mental disability, persons in nursing homes, children, impoverished persons, persons in emergency situations, homeless persons, nomads, refugees, and those incapable of giving informed consent. Vulnerable populations also may include members of a group with a hierarchical structure such as university students, subordinate hospital and laboratory personnel, employees of the Sponsor, members of the armed forces, and persons kept in detention. Angiographic Exclusion Criteria: All exclusion criteria apply to the target lesion(s) or target vessel(s). 1. Lesion which prevents successful balloon pre-dilatation, defined as full balloon expansion with the following outcomes: 1. Residual %DS is a maximum < 40% (per visual estimation), = 20% is strongly recommended. 2. TIMI Grade-3 flow (per visual estimation). 3. No angiographic complications (e.g. distal embolization, side branch closure). 4. No dissections NHLBI grade D-F. 5. No chest pain lasting > 5 minutes. 6. No ST depression or elevation lasting > 5 minutes. 2. Lesion is located in left main. 3. Aorto-ostial RCA lesion (within 3 mm of the ostium). 4. Lesion located within 3 mm of the origin of the LAD or LCX. 5. Lesion involving a bifurcation with a: 1. side branch = 2 mm in diameter, or 2. side branch with either an ostial or non-ostial lesion with diameter stenosis > 50%, or 3. side branch requiring dilatation 6. Anatomy proximal to or within the lesion that may impair delivery of the Absorb BVS or XIENCE stent: 1. Extreme angulation (= 90°) proximal to or within the target lesion. 2. Excessive tortuosity (= two 45° angles) proximal to or within the target lesion. 3. Moderate or heavy calcification proximal to or within the target lesion. If IVUS used, subject must be excluded if calcium arc in the vessel prior to the lesion or within the lesion is = 180°. 7. Vessel contains thrombus as indicated in the angiographic images or by IVUS or OCT. 8. Lesion or vessel involves a myocardial bridge. 9. Vessel has been previously treated with a stent at any time prior to the index procedure such that the Absorb BVS or XIENCE would need to cross the stent to reach the target lesion. 10. Vessel has been previously treated and the target lesion is within 5 mm proximal or distal to a previously treated lesion. 11. Target lesion located within an arterial or saphenous vein graft or distal to any arterial or saphenous vein graft. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Australia | St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne | Fitzroy | Victoria |
Australia | Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital | Herston | Queensland |
United States | Abington Memorial Hospital | Abington | Pennsylvania |
United States | Presbyterian Hospital | Albuquerque | New Mexico |
United States | Northwest Texas Healthcare System | Amarillo | Texas |
United States | AnMed Health | Anderson | South Carolina |
United States | Emory University Hospital | Atlanta | Georgia |
United States | Piedmont Hospital | Atlanta | Georgia |
United States | Saint Joseph's Hospital of Atlanta | Atlanta | Georgia |
United States | University Hospital | Augusta | Georgia |
United States | Seton Medical Center Austin | Austin | Texas |
United States | Eastern Maine Medical Center | Bangor | Maine |
United States | Bay Regional Medical Center | Bay City | Michigan |
United States | St. Joseph Hospital | Bellingham | Washington |
United States | Baptist Medical Center Princeton | Birmingham | Alabama |
United States | University of Alabama Hospital | Birmingham | Alabama |
United States | Boston University Medical Center | Boston | Massachusetts |
United States | Brigham and Women's Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts |
United States | Brandon Regional Hospital | Brandon | Florida |
United States | St. Elizabeth's Medical Center of Boston | Brighton | Massachusetts |
United States | Montefiore Medical Center | Bronx | New York |
United States | Fletcher Allen Health Care | Burlington | Vermont |
United States | Holy Spirit Hospital | Camp Hill | Pennsylvania |
United States | Aultman Hospital | Canton | Ohio |
United States | Medical University of South Carolina | Charleston | South Carolina |
United States | Carolinas Medical Center | Charlotte | North Carolina |
United States | Presbyterian Hospital | Charlotte | North Carolina |
United States | Memorial Hospital | Chattanooga | Tennessee |
United States | Northwestern Memorial Hospital | Chicago | Illinois |
United States | Bethesda North Hospital | Cincinnati | Ohio |
United States | The Christ Hospital | Cincinnati | Ohio |
United States | Tri-Health Good Samaritan Hospital | Cincinnati | Ohio |
United States | University Hospital | Cincinnati | Ohio |
United States | Morton Plant Hospital | Clearwater | Florida |
United States | Cleveland Clinic | Cleveland | Ohio |
United States | University Hospitals of Cleveland | Cleveland | Ohio |
United States | UCH-Memorial Health Systems | Colorado Springs | Colorado |
United States | Boone Hospital Center | Columbia | Missouri |
United States | Sisters of Charity Providence Hospital | Columbia | South Carolina |
United States | Ohio State University Medical Center | Columbus | Ohio |
United States | Riverside Methodist Hospital | Columbus | Ohio |
United States | John Muir Medical Center - Concord Campus | Concord | California |
United States | Baylor Jack and Jane Hamilton Heart and Vascular Hospital | Dallas | Texas |
United States | Geisinger Medical Center | Danville | Pennsylvania |
United States | Genesis Medical Center | Davenport | Iowa |
United States | Oakwood Hospital and Medical Center | Dearborn | Michigan |
United States | Harper University Hospital | Detroit | Michigan |
United States | Henry Ford Hospital | Detroit | Michigan |
United States | St. John Hospital & Medical Center | Detroit | Michigan |
United States | Doylestown Hospital | Doylestown | Pennsylvania |
United States | Duke University Medical Center | Durham | North Carolina |
United States | Elkhart General Healthcare | Elkhart | Indiana |
United States | EMH Healthcare | Elyria | Ohio |
United States | Englewood Hospital and Medical Center | Englewood | New Jersey |
United States | UPMC Hamot | Erie | Pennsylvania |
United States | Providence Regional Medical Center Everett | Everett | Washington |
United States | Thomas Hospital | Fairhope | Alabama |
United States | Cleveland Cln Fairview Hospital | Fairview Park | Ohio |
United States | Inova Fairfax Hospital | Falls Church | Virginia |
United States | Medical Center of the Rockies | Fort Collins | Colorado |
United States | Holy Cross Hospital | Fort Lauderdale | Florida |
United States | Mary Washington Hospital | Fredericksburg | Virginia |
United States | Washington Hospital | Fremont | California |
United States | Northeast Georgia Medical Center | Gainesville | Georgia |
United States | Chandler Regional Medical Center | Gilbert | Arizona |
United States | Greenville Memorial Hospital of the Greenville Health System | Greenville | South Carolina |
United States | St. Francis Health System | Greenville | South Carolina |
United States | Cooper University Hospital | Haddon Heights | New Jersey |
United States | Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center | Haddon Heights | New Jersey |
United States | Memorial Regional Hospital | Hollywood | Florida |
United States | St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital | Houston | Texas |
United States | The Methodist Hospital Research Institute | Houston | Texas |
United States | St. Mary's Medical Center | Huntington | West Virginia |
United States | MedStar Washington Hospital Center | Hyattsville | Maryland |
United States | Union Memorial Hospital | Hyattsville | Maryland |
United States | Franciscan St. Francis Health | Indianapolis | Indiana |
United States | Indiana University Health Methodist Hospital | Indianapolis | Indiana |
United States | St. Vincent Heart Center of Indiana | Indianapolis | Indiana |
United States | Baptist Medical Center - Downtown | Jacksonville | Florida |
United States | St. Vincent's Medical Center | Jacksonville | Florida |
United States | University of Florida UF Health | Jacksonville | Florida |
United States | Borgess Medical Center | Kalamazoo | Michigan |
United States | The University of Kansas Hospital and Medical Center | Kansas City | Kansas |
United States | Kettering Medical Center | Kettering | Ohio |
United States | Wellmont Holston Valley Medical Center | Kingsport | Tennessee |
United States | Turkey Creek Medical Center | Knoxville | Tennessee |
United States | Scripps Green Hospital | La Jolla | California |
United States | Scripps Memorial Hospital | La Jolla | California |
United States | St. Mary Medical Center | Langhorne | Pennsylvania |
United States | Sparrow Hospital | Lansing | Michigan |
United States | Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center | Lebanon | New Hampshire |
United States | Baptist Health Lexington | Lexington | Kentucky |
United States | University of Kentucky Medical Center | Lexington | Kentucky |
United States | Nebraska Heart Hospital | Lincoln | Nebraska |
United States | Arkansas Heart Hospital | Little Rock | Arkansas |
United States | St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center | Liverpool | New York |
United States | Cedars-Sinai Medical Center | Los Angeles | California |
United States | Good Samaritan Hospital | Los Angeles | California |
United States | Jewish Hospital | Louisville | Kentucky |
United States | Long Island Jewish Medical Center | Manhasset | New York |
United States | Wellstar Kennestone Hospital | Marietta | Georgia |
United States | Banner Heart Hospital | Mesa | Arizona |
United States | Baptist Hospital of Miami | Miami | Florida |
United States | University of Miami Hospital | Miami | Florida |
United States | Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center | Milwaukee | Wisconsin |
United States | Winthrop University Hospital | Mineola | New York |
United States | Abbott Northwestern Hospital | Minneapolis | Minnesota |
United States | St. Patrick Hospital | Missoula | Montana |
United States | Sutter Central Valley Hospitals dba Memorial Medical Center | Modesto | California |
United States | Baptist Medical Center South | Montgomery | Alabama |
United States | Morristown Medical Center | Morristown | New Jersey |
United States | InterMountain Medical Center | Murray | Utah |
United States | Vanderbilt University Medical Center | Nashville | Tennessee |
United States | Jersey Shore University Medical Center | Neptune | New Jersey |
United States | Yale-New Haven Hospital | New Haven | Connecticut |
United States | Columbia University Medical Center | New York | New York |
United States | Lennox Hill Hospital, | New York | New York |
United States | Mount Sinai Medical Center | New York | New York |
United States | New York Presbyterian Hospital-Cornell University | New York | New York |
United States | Christiana Care Health Services | Newark | Delaware |
United States | Sentara Norfolk General Hospital | Norfolk | Virginia |
United States | Advocate Christ Medical Center | Oak Lawn | Illinois |
United States | MediQuest Research Group Inc at Munroe Regional Medical Center | Ocala | Florida |
United States | Integris Baptist Medical Center | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma |
United States | Oklahoma Heart Hospital | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma |
United States | Florida Hospital | Orlando | Florida |
United States | Palm Beach Gardens Medical Center | Palm Beach Gardens | Florida |
United States | Bay County Health Systems | Panama City | Florida |
United States | St. Joseph's Regional Medical Center | Paterson | New Jersey |
United States | Baptist Hospital | Pensacola | Florida |
United States | Saint Francis Medical Center | Peoria | Illinois |
United States | Northern Michigan Hospital | Petoskey | Michigan |
United States | Penn Presbyterian Medical Center | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania |
United States | Pennsylvania Hospital | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania |
United States | Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center | Phoenix | Arizona |
United States | Allegheny General Hospital | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania |
United States | UPMC Presbyterian | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania |
United States | UPMC Shadyside Hospital | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania |
United States | The Heart Hospital Baylor Plano | Plano | Texas |
United States | Maine Medical Center | Portland | Maine |
United States | Providence St. Vincent Medical Center | Portland | Oregon |
United States | Rhode Island Hospital | Providence | Rhode Island |
United States | The Miriam Hospital | Providence | Rhode Island |
United States | Rex Hospital | Raleigh | North Carolina |
United States | WakeMed | Raleigh | North Carolina |
United States | The Valley Hospital | Ridgewood | New Jersey |
United States | Carilion Roanoke Memorial Hospital | Roanoke | Virginia |
United States | North Memorial Medical Center | Robbinsdale | Minnesota |
United States | Rochester General Hospital | Rochester | New York |
United States | Strong Memorial Hospital | Rochester | New York |
United States | William Beaumont Hospital | Royal Oak | Michigan |
United States | Mercy General Hospital | Sacramento | California |
United States | Sutter Medical Center | Sacramento | California |
United States | UC Davis Medical Center | Sacramento | California |
United States | Barnes Jewish Hospital | Saint Louis | Missouri |
United States | St. Anthony's Medical Center | Saint Louis | Missouri |
United States | Peninsula Regional Medical Center | Salisbury | Maryland |
United States | Methodist Texsan Hospital | San Antonio | Texas |
United States | Sharp Memorial Hospital | San Diego | California |
United States | Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital | Santa Barbara | California |
United States | Scottsdale Healthcare | Scottsdale | Arizona |
United States | Swedish Medical Center | Seattle | Washington |
United States | Sanford USD Medical Center | Sioux Falls | South Dakota |
United States | Mercy Hospital Springfield | Springfield | Missouri |
United States | PeaceHealth Sacred Heart Medical Center | Springfield | Oregon |
United States | St. John's Hospital | Springfield | Illinois |
United States | St. Vincent's Medical Center | Stamford | Connecticut |
United States | Stanford Hospital and Clinics | Stanford | California |
United States | Stony Brook University Medical Center | Stony Brook | New York |
United States | Washington Adventist Hospital | Takoma Park | Maryland |
United States | Tallahassee Memorial Hospital | Tallahassee | Florida |
United States | Florida Hospital Pepin Heart Institute | Tampa | Florida |
United States | Tampa General Hospital | Tampa | Florida |
United States | Mercy St. Vincent's Medical Center | Toledo | Ohio |
United States | The Toledo Hospital | Toledo | Ohio |
United States | Little Company Of Mary Hospital | Torrance | California |
United States | Torrance Memorial Medical Center | Torrance | California |
United States | Munson Medical Center | Traverse City | Michigan |
United States | Hillcrest Medical Center | Tulsa | Oklahoma |
United States | North Mississippi Medical Center Cardiology Associates Research, LLC | Tupelo | Mississippi |
United States | East Texas Medical Center | Tyler | Texas |
United States | Trinity Mother Frances Hospital Regional Healthcare Center | Tyler | Texas |
United States | Mercy Medical | West Des Moines | Iowa |
United States | Winchester Medical Center | Winchester | Virginia |
United States | Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center | Winston-Salem | North Carolina |
United States | Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center | Winston-Salem | North Carolina |
United States | UMass Memorial Medical Center | Worcester | Massachusetts |
United States | Pinnacle Health at Harrisburg Hospital | Wormleysburg | Pennsylvania |
United States | St. Joseph Medical Center | Wyomissing | Pennsylvania |
United States | York Hospital | York | Pennsylvania |
United States | St. Joseph Mercy Hospital | Ypsilanti | Michigan |
United States | Genesis-Good Samaritan Hospital | Zanesville | Ohio |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Abbott Medical Devices |
United States, Australia,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO): Overall Health Status | Overall health status assessed using the EuroQoL 5D (EQ-5D™).
EQ-5D: Scale range: 0 to 1 Higher values represent better outcomes Health status is measured in terms of five dimensions (5D); mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. Subscale scores are summed to obtain total/overall health status. A scoring algorithm was used to combine the sub-scores from each of the 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression), and generate a single index ranging from 0 to 1 |
Baseline | |
Other | Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO): Overall Health Status | Overall health status assessed using the EuroQoL 5D (EQ-5D™).
EQ-5D: Scale range: 0 to 1 Higher values represent better outcomes Health status is measured in terms of five dimensions (5D); mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. Subscale scores are summed to obtain total/overall health status. A scoring algorithm was used to combine the sub-scores from each of the 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression), and generate a single index ranging from 0 to 1 |
1 month | |
Other | Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO): Overall Health Status | Overall health status assessed using the EuroQoL 5D (EQ-5D™).
EQ-5D: Scale range: 0 to 1 Higher values represent better outcomes Health status is measured in terms of five dimensions (5D); mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. Subscale scores are summed to obtain total/overall health status. A scoring algorithm was used to combine the sub-scores from each of the 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression), and generate a single index ranging from 0 to 1 |
12 months | |
Other | Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO): Anxiety | Anxiety assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7).
GAD-7: Scale range: 0 to 21 Lower values represent better outcomes No subscales |
Baseline | |
Other | Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO): Anxiety | Anxiety assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7).
GAD-7: Scale range: 0 to 21 Lower values represent better outcomes No subscales |
1 month | |
Other | Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO): Anxiety | Anxiety assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7).
GAD-7: Scale range: 0 to 21 Lower values represent better outcomes No subscales |
12 months | |
Other | Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO): Disease-Specific Quality of Life | Disease-Specific quality of life assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ)
Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ): Each scale is transformed to a score of 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better function (eg, less physical limitation, less angina, and better quality of life). |
Baseline | |
Other | Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO): Disease-Specific Quality of Life | Disease-Specific quality of life in hospital baseline and at 1 year assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ).
Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ): Each scale is transformed to a score of 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better function (eg, less physical limitation, less angina, and better quality of life). |
1 month | |
Other | Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO): Disease-Specific Quality of Life | Disease-Specific quality of life in hospital baseline and at 1 year assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ).
Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ): Each scale is transformed to a score of 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better function (eg, less physical limitation, less angina, and better quality of life). |
12 months | |
Other | Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO): Dyspnea Severity | Dyspnea severity assessed using the Rose Dyspnea Scale (RDS).
Rose Dyspnea Scale: Scale range: 0 to 4 Lower values represent better outcomes (higher scores indicate worse dyspnea) No subscales |
Baseline | |
Other | Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO): Dyspnea Severity | Dyspnea severity assessed using the Rose Dyspnea Scale (RDS).
Rose Dyspnea Scale: Scale range: 0 to 4 Lower values represent better outcomes (higher scores indicate worse dyspnea) No subscales |
1 month | |
Other | Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO): Dyspnea Severity | Dyspnea severity assessed using the Rose Dyspnea Scale (RDS).
Rose Dyspnea Scale: Scale range: 0 to 4 Lower values represent better outcomes (higher scores indicate worse dyspnea) No subscales |
12 months | |
Other | Landmark Analysis on TLF and Components | TLF is defined as composite of Cardiac Death, Myocardial Infarction (per protocol-defined MI definition), attributable to Target Vessel (TVMI), or Ischemic-Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR). | 3-4 years | |
Other | Landmark Analysis on TLF and Components | TLF is defined as composite of Cardiac Death, Myocardial Infarction (per protocol-defined MI definition), attributable to Target Vessel (TVMI), or Ischemic-Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR). | 3-5 years | |
Other | Landmark Analysis on Cumulative Scaffold Thrombosis/Stent Thrombosis (Per ARC Definition, Definite and Probable) | Stent Thrombosis should be reported as a cumulative value at the different time points and with the different separate time points. Time 0 is defined as the time point after the guiding catheter has been removed and the subject left the Catheterization lab.
Timing : Acute : 0 - 24 hours post stent implantation; Subacute : >24 hours - 30 days post stent implantation; Late : 30 days - 1 year post stent implantation; Very late : >1 year post stent implantation. Evidence: Definite stent thrombosis is considered to have occurred by either angiographic or pathologic confirmation. Probable stent thrombosis is considered to have occurred after intracoronary stenting in case of Any unexplained death within the first 30 days or Irrespective of the time after the index procedure, any MI that is related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation of stent thrombosis and in the absence of any other obvious cause. |
3-4 years | |
Other | Landmark Analysis on Cumulative Scaffold Thrombosis/Stent Thrombosis (Per ARC Definition, Definite and Probable) | Stent Thrombosis should be reported as a cumulative value at the different time points and with the different separate time points. Time 0 is defined as the time point after the guiding catheter has been removed and the subject left the Catheterization lab.
Timing : Acute : 0 - 24 hours post stent implantation; Subacute : >24 hours - 30 days post stent implantation; Late : 30 days - 1 year post stent implantation; Very late : >1 year post stent implantation. Evidence: Definite stent thrombosis is considered to have occurred by either angiographic or pathologic confirmation. Probable stent thrombosis is considered to have occurred after intracoronary stenting in case of Any unexplained death within the first 30 days or Irrespective of the time after the index procedure, any MI that is related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation of stent thrombosis and in the absence of any other obvious cause. |
3-5 years | |
Primary | Number of Cardiac Death/TV-MI/ID-TLR (TLF) | TLF is defined as composite of Cardiac Death, Myocardial Infarction (per protocol-defined MI definition), attributable to Target Vessel (TV-MI), or Ischemic-Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR). | 1 year | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Powered Secondary Endpoint: Angina | Angina is defined as the first adverse event resulting in the site diagnosis of angina. | 1 year | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Powered Secondary Endpoint: All Revascularization | This powered secondary endpoint is intended to assess all revascularization at 1 year and test for superiority of Absorb BVS to XIENCE. All revascularizations are comprised of TLR, TVR excluding TLR, and non-TVR. | 1 year | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Powered Secondary Endpoint: Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR) | This powered secondary endpoint is intended to assess all ID-TVR at 1 year and test for superiority of Absorb BVS to XIENCE. | 1 year | |
Secondary | Acute Success- Device Success (Lesion Level Analysis) | Successful delivery and deployment of the study scaffold/stent at the intended target lesion and successful withdrawal of the delivery system with attainment of final in-scaffold/stent residual stenosis of less than 30% by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) (by visual estimation if QCA unavailable). When bailout scaffold/stent is used, the success or failure of the bailout scaffold/stent delivery and deployment is not one of the criteria for device success. | On day 0 (the day of procedure) | |
Secondary | Acute Success: Procedural Success (Subject Level Analysis) | Achievement of final in-scaffold/stent residual stenosis of less than 30% by QCA (by visual estimation if QCA unavailable) with successful delivery and deployment of at least one study scaffold/stent at the intended target lesion and successful withdrawal of the delivery system for all target lesions without the occurrence of cardiac death, target vessel MI or repeat TLR during the hospital stay (maximum of 7 days). | On day 0 (the day of procedure) | |
Secondary | Number of Death (Cardiac, Vascular, Non-cardiovascular) | DEATH (Per ARC Circulation) : All deaths are considered cardiac unless an unequivocal non-cardiac cause can be established. Specifically, any unexpected death even in patients with coexisting potentially fatal non-cardiac disease (e.g. cancer, infection) should be classified as cardiac.
Cardiac death (CD): Any death due to proximate cardiac cause (e.g. MI, low-output failure, fatal arrhythmia), unwitnessed death and death of unknown cause, all procedure related deaths including those related to concomitant treatment. Vascular death: Death due to non-coronary vascular causes such as cerebrovascular disease, pulmonary embolism, ruptured aortic aneurysm, dissecting aneurysm, or other vascular cause. Non-cardiovascular death: Any death not covered by the above definitions such as death caused by infection, malignancy, sepsis, pulmonary causes, accident, suicide or trauma. |
0 to 5 years | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With All Myocardial Infarction (MI) | Attributable to target vessel (TV-MI)
Not attributable to target vessel (NTV-MI) |
0 to 5 years | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With All Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) | TLR is defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention of the target lesion or bypass surgery of the target vessel performed for restenosis or other complication of the target lesion. All TLR should be classified prospectively as ischemia driven (ID-TLR) or not ischemia driven (NID-TLR) by the investigator prior to repeat angiography.
The target lesion is defined as the treated segment from 5 mm proximal to the stent and to 5 mm distal to the stent. |
0 to 5 years | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With All Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) Excluding Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) | TVR is defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention or surgical bypass of any segment of the target vessel. The target vessel is defined as the entire major coronary vessel proximal and distal to the target lesion which includes upstream and downstream branches and the target lesion itself. | 0 to 5 years | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With All Revascularization | All revascularization endpoint is comprised of TLR, TVR excluding TLR, and non-TVR. | 0 to 5 years | |
Secondary | Number of Death/All MI | All deaths includes Cardiac death: Any death due to proximate cardiac cause (e.g. MI, low-output failure, fatal arrhythmia), unwitnessed death and death of unknown cause, all procedure related deaths including those related to concomitant treatment.
Vascular death: Death due to non-coronary vascular causes such as cerebrovascular disease, pulmonary embolism, ruptured aortic aneurysm, dissecting aneurysm, or other vascular cause. Non-cardiovascular death: Any death not covered by the above definitions such as death caused by infection, malignancy, sepsis, pulmonary causes, accident, suicide or trauma. Myocardial Infarction (MI) - Q wave MI: Development of new, pathological Q wave on the ECG. -Non-Q wave MI: Those MIs which are not Q-wave MI |
0 to 5 years | |
Secondary | Number of Cardiac Death/All MI | All deaths includes Cardiac death: Any death due to proximate cardiac cause (e.g. MI, low-output failure, fatal arrhythmia), unwitnessed death and death of unknown cause, all procedure related deaths including those related to concomitant treatment.
Vascular death: Death due to non-coronary vascular causes such as cerebrovascular disease, pulmonary embolism, ruptured aortic aneurysm, dissecting aneurysm, or other vascular cause. Non-cardiovascular death: Any death not covered by the above definitions such as death caused by infection, malignancy, sepsis, pulmonary causes, accident, suicide or trauma. Myocardial Infarction (MI) - Q wave MI: Development of new, pathological Q wave on the ECG. -Non-Q wave MI: Those MIs which are not Q-wave MI |
0 to 5 years | |
Secondary | Number of Cardiac Death/TV-MI/ID-TLR (TLF) | Target Lesion Failure is composite of Cardiac death/ Target Vessel Myocardial Infarction (TV-MI)/ Ischemic-Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR). | 0 to 5 years | |
Secondary | Number of Cardiac Death/All MI/ID-TLR (Major Adverse Cardiac Events-MACE) | Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) is defined as the composite of cardiac death, all myocardial infarction, and ischemic driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR). | 0 to 5 years | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Target Vessel Failure (TVF) | Target Vessel Failure (TVF) is the composite of Cardiac Death, Myocardial infarction (MI) or Ischemic-Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR). | 0 to 5 years | |
Secondary | Number of Death/All MI/All Revascularization (DMR) | DMR is the composite of All Death, All Myocardial infarction (MI) and All Revascularization. | 0 to 5 years | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Acute Stent/Scaffold Thrombosis (Per ARC Definition) | Stent Thrombosis should be reported as a cumulative value at the different time points and with the different separate time points. Time 0 is defined as the time point after the guiding catheter has been removed and the subject left the Catheterization lab.
Timing : Acute : 0 - 24 hours post stent implantation; Subacute : >24 hours - 30 days post stent implantation; Late : 30 days - 1 year post stent implantation; Very late : >1 year post stent implantation. Evidence: Definite stent thrombosis is considered to have occurred by either angiographic or pathologic confirmation. Probable stent thrombosis is considered to have occurred after intracoronary stenting in case of Any unexplained death within the first 30 days or Irrespective of the time after the index procedure, any MI that is related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation of stent thrombosis and in the absence of any other obvious cause. |
= 1 Day | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Acute/Subacute Stent/Scaffold Thrombosis (Per ARC Definition) | Stent Thrombosis should be reported as a cumulative value at the different time points and with the different separate time points. Time 0 is defined as the time point after the guiding catheter has been removed and the subject left the Catheterization lab.
Timing : Acute : 0 - 24 hours post stent implantation; Subacute : >24 hours - 30 days post stent implantation; Late : 30 days - 1 year post stent implantation; Very late : >1 year post stent implantation. Evidence: Definite stent thrombosis is considered to have occurred by either angiographic or pathologic confirmation. Probable stent thrombosis is considered to have occurred after intracoronary stenting in case of Any unexplained death within the first 30 days or Irrespective of the time after the index procedure, any MI that is related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation of stent thrombosis and in the absence of any other obvious cause. |
0 to 30 Days | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Subacute Stent/Scaffold Thrombosis | Stent Thrombosis should be reported as a cumulative value at the different time points and with the different separate time points. Time 0 is defined as the time point after the guiding catheter has been removed and the subject left the Catheterization lab.
Timing : Acute : 0 - 24 hours post stent implantation; Subacute : >24 hours - 30 days post stent implantation; Late : 30 days - 1 year post stent implantation; Very late : >1 year post stent implantation. Evidence: Definite stent thrombosis is considered to have occurred by either angiographic or pathologic confirmation. Probable stent thrombosis is considered to have occurred after intracoronary stenting in case of Any unexplained death within the first 30 days or Irrespective of the time after the index procedure, any MI that is related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation of stent thrombosis and in the absence of any other obvious cause. |
>1 to 30 Days | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Late Stent/Scaffold Thrombosis (Per ARC Definition) | Stent Thrombosis should be reported as a cumulative value at the different time points and with the different separate time points. Time 0 is defined as the time point after the guiding catheter has been removed and the subject left the Catheterization lab.
Timing : Acute : 0 - 24 hours post stent implantation; Subacute : >24 hours - 30 days post stent implantation; Late : 30 days - 1 year post stent implantation; Very late : >1 year post stent implantation. Evidence: Definite stent thrombosis is considered to have occurred by either angiographic or pathologic confirmation. Probable stent thrombosis is considered to have occurred after intracoronary stenting in case of Any unexplained death within the first 30 days or Irrespective of the time after the index procedure, any MI that is related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation of stent thrombosis and in the absence of any other obvious cause. |
31 to 365 Days | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Very Late Stent /Scaffold Thrombosis (Per ARC Definition) | Stent Thrombosis should be reported as a cumulative value at the different time points and with the different separate time points. Time 0 is defined as the time point after the guiding catheter has been removed and the subject left the Catheterization lab.
Timing : Acute : 0 - 24 hours post stent implantation; Subacute : >24 hours - 30 days post stent implantation; Late : 30 days - 1 year post stent implantation; Very late : >1 year post stent implantation. Evidence: Definite stent thrombosis is considered to have occurred by either angiographic or pathologic confirmation. Probable stent thrombosis is considered to have occurred after intracoronary stenting in case of Any unexplained death within the first 30 days or Irrespective of the time after the index procedure, any MI that is related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation of stent thrombosis and in the absence of any other obvious cause. |
366 to 393 Days | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Cumulative Stent/Scaffold Thrombosis | Stent Thrombosis should be reported as a cumulative value at the different time points and with the different separate time points. Time 0 is defined as the time point after the guiding catheter has been removed and the subject left the Catheterization lab.
Timing : Acute : 0 - 24 hours post stent implantation; Subacute : >24 hours - 30 days post stent implantation; Late : 30 days - 1 year post stent implantation; Very late : >1 year post stent implantation. Evidence: Definite stent thrombosis is considered to have occurred by either angiographic or pathologic confirmation. Probable stent thrombosis is considered to have occurred after intracoronary stenting in case of Any unexplained death within the first 30 days or Irrespective of the time after the index procedure, any MI that is related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation of stent thrombosis and in the absence of any other obvious cause. |
0 to 1853 Days | |
Secondary | Pre-Procedure Minimum Lumen Diameter (MLD) | Angiographic endpoint Minimum lumen diameter is defined as the shortest diameter through the center point of the lumen. | < or = 1 day | |
Secondary | Pre-Procedure Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS) | Percent Diameter Stenosis is defined as the value calculated as 100 * (1 - Minimum Luminal Diameter (MLD)/Reference vessel diameter (RVD)) using the mean values from two orthogonal views (when possible) by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). | < or = 1 day | |
Secondary | Post-Procedure In-Segment Minimum Lumen Diameter (MLD) | Angiographic endpoint. Minimum lumen diameter is defined as the shortest diameter through the center point of the lumen.
In- Segment is defined as, within the margins of the stent or scaffold and 5 mm proximal and 5 mm distal to the stent or scaffold. |
= 7 days post index procedure | |
Secondary | Post-Procedure In-Segment Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS) | Angiographic endpoint. Percent Diameter Stenosis is defined as the value calculated as 100 * (1 - Minimum Luminal Diameter (MLD)/Reference vessel diameter (RVD)) using the mean values from two orthogonal views (when possible) by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA).
In- Segment is defined as, within the margins of the stent or scaffold and 5 mm proximal and 5 mm distal to the stent or scaffold. |
= 7 days post index procedure | |
Secondary | Post-Procedure In-Device Minimum Lumen Diameter (MLD) | Angiographic endpoint. Minimum lumen diameter is defined as the shortest diameter through the center point of the lumen.
In- Segment is defined as, within the margins of the stent or scaffold and 5 mm proximal and 5 mm distal to the stent or scaffold |
= 7 days post index procedure | |
Secondary | Post-Procedure In-Device Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS) | Angiographic endpoint. Percent Diameter Stenosis is defined as the value calculated as 100 * (1 - Minimum Luminal Diameter (MLD)/Reference vessel diameter (RVD)) using the mean values from two orthogonal views (when possible) by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). | = 7 days post index procedure | |
Secondary | Post-Procedure In-Device Acute Gain | The acute gain was defined as the difference between post- and pre procedural minimal lumen diameter (MLD). | = 7 days post index procedure | |
Secondary | Powered Imaging Cohort Secondary Endpoint: The Instent/Scaffold Mean Lumen Area Change, From Post Procedure to 3 Years by Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) | Mean lumen area measured after nitrate infusions, superiority test, ~300 pooled subjects.
Pooled IVUS subjects (~300 subjects): 150 subjects from the Imaging Cohort of ABSORB III RCT and 150 subjects from ABSORB Japan RCT. |
From Post procedure to 3 Years | |
Secondary | Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Endpoint: Mean Neointimal Area (NIA) | All OCT endpoints will be collected for within the device and within the treated segment: Descriptive analysis of strut, lesion and vessel morphology Mean neointimal area (NIA) - Apposed to the vessel wall with neointimal coverage Apposed to vessel wall without neointimal coverage Incomplete apposition to vessel wall with neointimal coverage Incomplete apposition to vessel wall without neointimal coverage Lumen area/volume stenosis % Mean/minimal device area Mean/minimal luminal area/volume Mean strut area/volume Persisting incomplete apposition, late incomplete apposition at 3 years (if analyzable) OCT analysis for subjects with jailed side branch Descriptive analyses from 3-dimensional OCT reconstructions | 3 Years | |
Secondary | Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Endpoint: Mean Device Area, Adluminal | All OCT endpoints will be collected for within the device and within the treated segment: Descriptive analysis of strut, lesion and vessel morphology Mean neointimal area (NIA) - Apposed to the vessel wall with neointimal coverage Apposed to vessel wall without neointimal coverage Incomplete apposition to vessel wall with neointimal coverage Incomplete apposition to vessel wall without neointimal coverage Lumen area/volume stenosis % Mean/minimal device area Mean/minimal luminal area/volume Mean strut area/volume Persisting incomplete apposition, late incomplete apposition at 3 years (if analyzable) OCT analysis for subjects with jailed side branch Descriptive analyses from 3-dimensional OCT reconstructions | 3 Years | |
Secondary | Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Endpoint: Mean Lumen Area | All OCT endpoints will be collected for within the device and within the treated segment: Descriptive analysis of strut, lesion and vessel morphology Mean neointimal area (NIA) - Apposed to the vessel wall with neointimal coverage Apposed to vessel wall without neointimal coverage Incomplete apposition to vessel wall with neointimal coverage Incomplete apposition to vessel wall without neointimal coverage Lumen area/volume stenosis % Mean/minimal device area Mean/minimal luminal area/volume Mean strut area/volume Persisting incomplete apposition, late incomplete apposition at 3 years (if analyzable) OCT analysis for subjects with jailed side branch Descriptive analyses from 3-dimensional OCT reconstructions | 3 Years | |
Secondary | Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Endpoint: Minimal Lumen Area | All OCT endpoints will be collected for within the device and within the treated segment: Descriptive analysis of strut, lesion and vessel morphology Mean neointimal area (NIA) - Apposed to the vessel wall with neointimal coverage Apposed to vessel wall without neointimal coverage Incomplete apposition to vessel wall with neointimal coverage Incomplete apposition to vessel wall without neointimal coverage Lumen area/volume stenosis % Mean/minimal device area Mean/minimal luminal area/volume Mean strut area/volume Persisting incomplete apposition, late incomplete apposition at 3 years (if analyzable) OCT analysis for subjects with jailed side branch Descriptive analyses from 3-dimensional OCT reconstructions | 3 Years | |
Secondary | Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Endpoint: Percentage of Malapposition Struts | All OCT endpoints will be collected for within the device and within the treated segment: Descriptive analysis of strut, lesion and vessel morphology Mean neointimal area (NIA) - Apposed to the vessel wall with neointimal coverage Apposed to vessel wall without neointimal coverage Incomplete apposition to vessel wall with neointimal coverage Incomplete apposition to vessel wall without neointimal coverage Lumen area/volume stenosis % Mean/minimal device area Mean/minimal luminal area/volume Mean strut area/volume Persisting incomplete apposition, late incomplete apposition at 3 years (if analyzable) OCT analysis for subjects with jailed side branch Descriptive analyses from 3-dimensional OCT reconstructions | 3 Years |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT06030596 -
SPECT Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification for Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease Determined by Fraction Flow Reserve
|
||
Completed |
NCT04080700 -
Korean Prospective Registry for Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Distal Radial Approach (KODRA)
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03810599 -
Patient-reported Outcomes in the Bergen Early Cardiac Rehabilitation Study
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06002932 -
Comparison of PROVISIONal 1-stent Strategy With DEB Versus Planned 2-stent Strategy in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions.
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06032572 -
Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the VRS100 System in PCI (ESSENCE)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04242134 -
Drug-coating Balloon Angioplasties for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05308719 -
Nasal Oxygen Therapy After Cardiac Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04556994 -
Phase 1 Cardiac Rehabilitation With and Without Lower Limb Paddling Effects in Post CABG Patients.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05846893 -
Drug-Coated Balloon vs. Drug-Eluting Stent for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Large Coronary Artery Disease
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06027788 -
CTSN Embolic Protection Trial
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05023629 -
STunning After Balloon Occlusion
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04941560 -
Assessing the Association Between Multi-dimension Facial Characteristics and Coronary Artery Diseases
|
||
Completed |
NCT04006288 -
Switching From DAPT to Dual Pathway Inhibition With Low-dose Rivaroxaban in Adjunct to Aspirin in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01860274 -
Meshed Vein Graft Patency Trial - VEST
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06174090 -
The Effect of Video Education on Pain, Anxiety and Knowledge Levels of Coronary Bypass Graft Surgery Patients
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT03959072 -
Cardiac Cath Lab Staff Radiation Exposure
|
||
Completed |
NCT03968809 -
Role of Cardioflux in Predicting Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Outcomes
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04566497 -
Assessment of Adverse Outcome in Asymptomatic Patients With Prior Coronary Revascularization Who Have a Systematic Stress Testing Strategy Or a Non-testing Strategy During Long-term Follow-up.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05065073 -
Iso-Osmolar vs. Low-Osmolar Contrast Agents for Optical Coherence Tomography
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT05096442 -
Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Genoss® DCB and SeQuent® Please NEO in Korean Patients With Coronary De Novo Lesions
|
N/A |