Coronary Artery Disease Clinical Trial
Official title:
Hybrid Revascularization Observational Study
The purpose of the study is to get a better understanding of patients who have multi-vessel coronary artery disease (blockages in more than one vessel bringing blood to the heart) and have either Hybrid Coronary Revascularization [HCR] (combination of surgery and catheter procedures to open up clogged heart arteries) or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI] (catheter procedures to open up clogged heart arteries). Participation in the study will last up to 21 months after a patient's heart procedure(s). The study collects information about the medical care patients receive during their planned procedure(s) and how well they do following the procedure(s). No new testing or procedures will be done. Patients will receive only the tests or procedures their doctor already has planned for them. The information collected should help to plan the design of a pivotal comparative effectiveness study of hybrid revascularization.
The increasing prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD), advances in coronary artery
bypass grafting (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and concomitant medical
therapy, and the costs of revascularization have resulted in rising interest regarding the
appropriate indications for coronary revascularization. For patients with 3-vessel disease,
revascularization by CABG has recently been rated as appropriate while revascularization by
PCI has been rated uncertain. Ideally, physicians would like to offer their multi-vessel CAD
patients what they truly seek: a solution which provides a safe, minimally invasive
treatment that does not compromise long term durability and survival. Integrating the
positive features of both PCI and CABG has been the fundamental rationale of "hybrid"
coronary revascularization.
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization (HCR) (the intended combination of CABG and PCI) as a
scientifically validated approach would have a major healthcare impact. The ability to
deliver a new therapy for CAD that provides durability, but without the obligatory trauma
and prolonged recovery time characteristic of conventional CABG would be a major advance in
the field of cardiovascular medicine. Candidates in whom HCR would be particularly
advantageous would be several subgroups of CAD patients that are increasing in numbers: the
elderly, patients with a high predicted risk of mortality and/or morbidity for CABG,
deconditioned patients or patients with significant disabilities and patients in whom
treatment durability is important, but a significantly invasive approach is not an option.
Moreover, HCR is likely to bridge the divide in treatment philosophies and approaches that
exist between cardiologists and cardiac surgeons. Collaboration rather than competition
between these specialties will ultimately benefit patients, hospitals, payers and healthcare
providers. The Hybrid Revascularization Observational Study is a multi-center observational
study planning grant which will explore target populations for Hybrid Coronary
Revascularization (HCR), their outcomes, and variations in specific ways these patients are
managed, in order to inform the design of a pivotal comparative effectiveness trial of this
emerging therapeutic strategy.
Given the observational nature of the study, the HCR and PCI groups' baseline
characteristics and event rates are not directly comparable; rather, the results were
intended to inform the design of a larger, randomized pivotal trial. The study was designed
in two phases: Cohort 1, which captured demographic, angiographic, and practice patterns
data for 6,669 consecutively screened patients; and Cohort 2 which captured demographic,
angiographic, practice patterns, and outcome data for 298 patients who underwent either HCR
or PCI with DES (90 of whom were also part of Cohort 1).
;
Observational Model: Cohort, Time Perspective: Prospective
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recruiting |
NCT06030596 -
SPECT Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification for Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease Determined by Fraction Flow Reserve
|
||
| Completed |
NCT04080700 -
Korean Prospective Registry for Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Distal Radial Approach (KODRA)
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT03810599 -
Patient-reported Outcomes in the Bergen Early Cardiac Rehabilitation Study
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT06002932 -
Comparison of PROVISIONal 1-stent Strategy With DEB Versus Planned 2-stent Strategy in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions.
|
N/A | |
| Not yet recruiting |
NCT06032572 -
Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the VRS100 System in PCI (ESSENCE)
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT04242134 -
Drug-coating Balloon Angioplasties for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05308719 -
Nasal Oxygen Therapy After Cardiac Surgery
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT04556994 -
Phase 1 Cardiac Rehabilitation With and Without Lower Limb Paddling Effects in Post CABG Patients.
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05846893 -
Drug-Coated Balloon vs. Drug-Eluting Stent for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Large Coronary Artery Disease
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT06027788 -
CTSN Embolic Protection Trial
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05023629 -
STunning After Balloon Occlusion
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT04941560 -
Assessing the Association Between Multi-dimension Facial Characteristics and Coronary Artery Diseases
|
||
| Completed |
NCT04006288 -
Switching From DAPT to Dual Pathway Inhibition With Low-dose Rivaroxaban in Adjunct to Aspirin in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
|
Phase 4 | |
| Completed |
NCT01860274 -
Meshed Vein Graft Patency Trial - VEST
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT06174090 -
The Effect of Video Education on Pain, Anxiety and Knowledge Levels of Coronary Bypass Graft Surgery Patients
|
N/A | |
| Terminated |
NCT03959072 -
Cardiac Cath Lab Staff Radiation Exposure
|
||
| Completed |
NCT03968809 -
Role of Cardioflux in Predicting Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Outcomes
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT05065073 -
Iso-Osmolar vs. Low-Osmolar Contrast Agents for Optical Coherence Tomography
|
Phase 4 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT04566497 -
Assessment of Adverse Outcome in Asymptomatic Patients With Prior Coronary Revascularization Who Have a Systematic Stress Testing Strategy Or a Non-testing Strategy During Long-term Follow-up.
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05096442 -
Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Genoss® DCB and SeQuent® Please NEO in Korean Patients With Coronary De Novo Lesions
|
N/A |