View clinical trials related to Colorectal Cancer.
Filter by:The purpose of this Phase I, Multi-Center, Open-Label Study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and anti-tumor activity of KF-0210 in participants with advanced solid tumors. The study will be conducted in two parts: phase Ia, and phase Ib.
This is a 3-arm randomized trial aimed at increasing rates of participation in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening by outreach to patients' homes using choice architecture informed by behavioral science principles.
The study is intended to compare the detection rate obtained by performing G-EYE® high definition colonoscopy vs. the detection rate obtained by performing ECV high definition colonoscopy.
This study focused on the key nodes, molecular events and regulatory mechanisms of intestinal microecological disorders that affect the malignant transformation of intestinal epithelial cells into tumors during the occurrence and development of colorectal cancer.
Colorectal and pancreatobiliary cancers are the most common digestive cancers. Their incidence has particularly increased over the last few decades, leading to suspicion that environmental factors are involved. In addition, strategies for the therapeutic management of these cancers are evolving in the context of the development of immunotherapies. Tumor microenvironment is a potential source of new diagnostic, prognostic and predictive markers and new therapeutic targets. The links between tumor microenvironment and modulation of the immune system in colorectal and pancreatobiliary cancers are poorly understood. Molecular classifications have been proposed for these cancers, but their link with immunity and response to treatment remains to be explored. Objective : explore links between molecular subtypes, tumor microenvironment, host (immune system, pre-metastatic niche, intestinal microbiota, metabolism), and survival (prognostic value), response (predictive value) and tolerance (toxicities) to treatments in digestive cancers, in particular colorectal and pancreatobiliary cancers. Method: Retrospective and prospective monocentric cohort study
This pilot study will explore the preliminary efficacy of a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening intervention delivered by virtual health assistants (VHAs). Participants will include 750 African American patients in the US between the ages of 45 and 75 recruited through Qualtrics panels. The main research question is: How does the integration of different levels of dialect density of the linguistic features of African American English (AAE) influence the perceived credibility of a Black VHA. Four types of VHAs will be presented to our patients: a VHA with Standardized American English (SAE) linguistic features, a VHA with a low level of African American English (AAE) linguistic features integrated, a VHA with a high level of African American English (AAE) linguistic features integrated, and a text-only control condition. Survey questions will be used to obtain credibility judgments about VHAs post-interaction.
The investigators will detect circulating tumor DNA in blood of patients with lung metastases from colorectal cancer using NGS technology and intend to use it for predicting the outcome of local treatment (surgery or radiation) and recurrence of lung metastases.
The diagnostic accuracy and safety of colonoscopy highly depends on the quality of the pre-procedural bowel preparation. A past history of poor bowel preparation is the most important risk factor of inadequate bowel cleansing at the next colonoscopy. This study aims to evaluate if an adequate level of bowel cleansing can be achieved with the Pure-Vu System in patients with previous poor bowel preparation, in a single arm international multicenter feasibility study.
Bowel cancer is the third most common cancer occurring in the UK. Treatment usually involves surgery, often with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. In some cases radiotherapy can be used instead of surgery, especially if surgery may cause a higher risk of symptoms or a colostomy bag. Currently, the medical team collects information on patients' symptoms before and after treatment by direct questions in a clinic setting. It's recognised that patient-reported symptoms often differ from doctor-documented symptoms. This leads to inaccuracies in doctors' descriptions of the effects of cancer or treatment to patients. Patients told us an accurate description of expected symptoms is important when they are choosing their treatment. Patient-Reported outcomes measures (PROMs) may help us identify what affects the QoL after treatment and develop ways to improve it. The primary aim of the trial is to evaluate whether patients find it acceptable to use electronic data collection to assess their symptoms. Many bowel cancer patients are elderly and they may find electronic data system collection more challenging. The secondary aim is to identify which symptoms impact QoL. This will lead to the development of treatments to manage these symptoms which will be assessed in CITRuS2. All patients diagnosed with bowel cancer are entered into the colorectal database to determine the effectiveness of cancer treatments and outcomes. Participants will electronically answer questionnaires at study entry and during follow up. The questions are related to health and well-being with a holistic approach. The questions will take approximately 45 minutes to answer the first time and then 15 minutes thereafter. Following consent, participants gain access to their clinical details on the database. Then they can use a computer, laptop, tablet or smart phone to access a webpage and answer questions at monthly intervals over a 2 year period. Email reminders will be sent to prompt log on. This may help discover how bowel cancer and its treatment affect patients and their lives. This may help doctors describe the effects of treatment more accurately to future patients. It may also help doctors identify which patients need extra help or support through their treatment. Electronic data may allow patterns to be identified that may not be seen by doctors until a later stage. This may enable earlier treatment resulting in less time with symptoms, which could be physically and economically beneficial.
This is a single center, open-label, nonrandomized, Phase 1b, dose-escalation study designed to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of CKD-516 in combination with durvalumab and evaluate the safety and tolerability profile, efficacy of CKD-516 and durvalumab treatment.