View clinical trials related to Colonoscopy.
Filter by:Colonoscopy is the gold standard in the diagnosis and treatment colorectal disease, but due to the uncomfortable or even painful procedure, a part of people unwilling to undergoing the examination and giving analgesic agents were recommended in several guidelines. However, use of analgesic agents have their own drawbacks, and nearly 70% patients felt no pain or only mild discomfort with the unsedated colonoscopy, routine administration of sedative or analgesic agents to all patients was considered as unnecessary. However, unsedated colonoscopy was thought to be an option for some but not for all, therefore a method to identify which patients at high risk for painful colonoscopy in preoperational stage is necessary.
An adequate bowel preparation has been well established to lead to a successful colonoscopy. Research has consistently demonstrated inadequate bowel preparation with lower adenoma detection rates. Over the years, endoscopy centers have changed the constituents of bowel preparation in light of new research. In 2006, 3 medical organizations recommended the use of polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution for bowel preparation. Initially, a 4 liter PEG solution was commonly used using a split dose regimen for bowel prep. However, many patients found that this large volume gave them side effects including bloating and cramping. Other studies showed that a low volume PEG solution with oral bisacodyl fared equally in terms of adequacy of bowel preparation. With the institution of lower volume PEG preparation our offices noted improved patient toleration, satisfaction, and clinical outcomes. However, multiple endoscopists have noticed an increased in intraluminal bubbles and foam with the low volume preparation. This can impair proper visualization of the bowel wall even with an adequate bowel preparation. The current standard of practice includes irrigation, lavage, and suctioning using a simethicone infused saline during the colonoscopy. Its property of reducing surface tension to help dissolve bubbles and clear the field of view is vital during the procedure. Furthermore, it does not dissolve into the blood stream and thereby, is considered rather safe. This study evaluates whether the addition of oral simethicone with the colonoscopy bowel preparation reduces bubbles and foam during the procedure using a randomized and controlled interventional study.
The objective of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of BLI4700 bowel preparation to an FDA-approved bowel preparation as 2-day, split-dose bowel preparations prior to colonoscopy in adult patients.
Current recommendations for colonoscopy screening programs usually involve patients older than 50 years of age. However, little is known about polyp or adenoma detection rates under 50. We compared these detection rates according to age in a large series of patients in common practice. Methods: All colonoscopies performed in 2016 in our unit were prospectively recorded. We determined adenoma detection rate (ADR), polyp detection rate (PDR), mean number of polyps (MNP), and advanced neoplasia detection rate (ANDR).
This was a randomized, endoscopists' blinded comparison of bowel colonoscopy cleansing and tolerability of a prespecified low-residue diet compared with a clear liquid diet and Polyethylene Glycol bowel preparation. Outcome measures included efficacy of bowel preparation, patient preparation tolerability and side-effects.
The aim of the present study is to compare polyp detection rates of LCI with high-definition white light endoscopy (HD-WLE) in patients with Lynch syndrome in a parallel, international, multicenter, randomized controlled colonoscopy trial
This is a prospective study comparing endocuff-assisted colonoscopy to standard colonoscopy. The goal of this study is to evaluate the interest of second-generation Endocuff Vision (ECV) to improve Adenoma detection rate and / or Polyp detection rate as the Mean Number of Polyps (average number of polyps) in routine colonoscopy. This is a prospective comparative study, on 2000 patients, 1000 in each group (with and without ECV)
Background 2L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid (PEGA) is known to be as effective as standard 4L polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation. However, the volume of this regimen is still large. Therefore, the present investigators evaluated the potential of 1L PEGA with prepackaged low-residue diet (PLD) for an alternative to 2L PEGA. Aim: To evaluate efficacy of 1L PEG with ascorbic acid combined with prepackaged low-residue diet as bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Methods: The subjects were randomly assigned to either groups. PEGA group received 2L PEGA split regimen. PLD group received PLD on the day preceding colonoscopy and 1L PEGA on the morning of colonoscopy. One blinded physician performed colonoscopy and evaluated the degree of bowel preparation using Boston bowel preparation score (BBPS). A questionnaire regarding tolerability and safety were also gathered.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BLI4900 as a bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy in adult patients.
This prospective randomized controlled trial compared integrated water jet channel colonoscopy with traditional accessory channel colonoscopy in cecal insertion time among patients undergoing WE method colonoscopy.