View clinical trials related to Colonoscopy.
Filter by:Comparison of bowel preparation using 2 liter polyethylene glycol regimen plus elobixibat Versus 4-Liter polyethylene glycol regimen. This study based on hypothesis that show Boston bowel preparation scale which 2L PEG regimen plus Elobixibat have result no significant difference from 4L PEG regimen
104 patients who undergo painless colonoscopy from January 20,2024 to February 29,2024 will be randomized to two groups: propofol group and dexmedetomidine group. In the dexmedetomidine group,dexmedetomidine is infusion intravenously with a loading dose of 0.5 μg kg-1 for 10 min, then infusion at 0.3 μg kg-1 h-1 according to the ideal body weight of the patient until the end of colonoscopy. In the propofol group, Propofol is administrated 1 mg kg-1 intravenously, then titrated given by 0.5 mg kg-1 during the whole process.
Colorectal cancers are a major global health problem, highlighting the critical importance of screening programs for early diagnosis and effective treatment. The success of colonoscopy largely depends on the quality of bowel preparation. Inadequate bowel preparation may reduce the effectiveness of colonoscopy and cause lesions to be missed. Previous research has shown the positive effects of diet, training, and polyethylene glycol use on bowel readiness. However, there is limited research on the effects of methods such as gum chewing and walking exercise. This study aims to evaluate the effects of gum chewing and walking exercise, as well as diet and medication, on the quality of bowel preparation and patient satisfaction during the bowel preparation process before colonoscopy. The study uses a randomized controlled, single-blind experimental design with three different groups: a control group, a gum chewing group, and a walking exercise group. Each group will be evaluated based on bowel preparation quality and patient satisfaction. The quality of bowel preparation will be determined using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale, and factors such as polyp detection, workability of colonoscopy, and cecal intubation time will also be evaluated. Patient satisfaction levels will be evaluated by taking into account how satisfied the patients are with the colonoscopy procedure and their complaints before and after the procedure. The results of this study will contribute to a better understanding of the impact of chewing gum and walking exercise before colonoscopy on the quality of bowel preparation and patient satisfaction. Identifying effective methods to improve the quality of bowel preparation can contribute to a healthier society by raising the standard of nursing care. At the same time, this research may improve the comfort and effectiveness of the colonoscopy process for patients and benefit public health by increasing the effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening programs.
Phase of Development : III Sponsor : DAEWOONG PHARMACEUTICAL Study Sites and Principal Investigator : Dong ll Park M.D. Ph.D , Gastroenterology Kangbuk Samsung Hospital and other 5 study sites Study Period : From the protocol approval date (institutional review board, IRB) 24 Months Investigational product : Investigational Products DWJ1609 (sodium sulfate potassium sulfate, Magnesium Sulfate Anhydrous , simethicone, sodium picosulphate) Control Products DWC202304 (sodium sulfate potassium sulfate, Magnesium Sulfate Anhydrous , simethicone) Target Diseases : A person who needs treatment before colonoscopy (X-ray, endoscopy) Number of Subjects : 214 Subjects in total (85 subjects per group, 2 groups in total, considering a 20% dropout rate)
In this study, the investigators proposed a prospective study about the effectiveness of speech and image recognition-based system in improving reporting quality during colonoscopy for colonoscopy report quality in endoscopists. The participants would be divided into two groups. For the collected colonoscopy videos, group A would record their observations with the assistance of the artificial intelligence system. The artificial intelligence assistant system can automatically capture bowel segment images and prompt abnormal lesions. Group B would complete the endoscopy report without special prompts. After a period of washout period, the two groups switched, that is, group A without AI assistance and group B with AI assistance to complete the colonoscopy report. Then, the completeness of the colonoscopy report, the completeness of capturing anatomical landmarks and detected lesions, the completeness of structured description, the accuracy of lesion reporting, the time for reporting and the satisfaction with the reporting system are compared with or without AI assistance.
This is a single blinded randomized controlled study. The main question of this study is whether better preparation by making full use of digital tools can increase patient compliance with the preparation methods for colonoscopy, and as a result improve bowel preparation quality and colonoscopy outcomes in a cost-effective manner. Participants will randomly assigned to one of three colonoscopy preparation groups (i) a written hand out containing all information required for bowel preparation (standard care) (ii) standard care and in addition a video call with a professional nurse conducted via digital devices and a free software (Zoom video communication or What's app application) (iii) standard care and in addition to a video call as described above using an explanatory short video on bowel preparation (video film), streamed to the patient's mobile device or computer.
The aim of this study is to compare the sedative, analgesic effect and hemodynamic changes due to dexmedetomidine and nalbuphine during elective colonoscopy.
During colonoscopy, the insertion of the fiberscope and colon distension required to perform the examination may induce modifications to respiratory mechanics, respiratory effort and breathing pattern. High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy is a mixed air-oxygen supply system able to deliver heated humidified gas up to 60 L/min of flow rate, with an inspiratory oxygen fraction (FiO2) ranging from 21% to 100%. Increasing evidence supports the use of HFNC in several clinical conditions and settings. When compared to standard therapy (ST), HFNC results in enhanced gas exchange and improved comfort. No studies have yet assessed the benefits of HFNC versus ST during and after colonoscopy. The investigators designed this unblinded randomized controlled trial to assess whether HFNC, compared to ST, improves oxygenation at the end of the procedure (primary endpoint). Additional endpoints were: 1) the lowest peripheral saturation of oxygen (SpO2) and the number of oxygen desaturations; 2) the changes of end-expiratory lung impedance and tidal impedance assessed by Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT); 3) the effects on diaphragm function assessed by ultrasound (DUS).
Fasting is the current standard of care for colonoscopies. Recent changes to anesthesia guidelines have allowed for clear fluids to be provided up to 2 hours before procedures, including colonoscopies. This study will compare fasting to a 12.5% carbohydrate solution 2 hours before colonoscopy on patient-reported measures of discomfort, hydration, and colon visibility. The investigators hypothesize that the carbohydrate solution will improve patient-reported measures of discomfort, hydration, and colon visibility.
This project will use deep learning to classify colonoscopy images of different severity of ulcerative colitis, so as to assist clinicians in the accurate diagnosis of ulcerative colitis.