View clinical trials related to Colonoscopy.
Filter by:In this study, the investigators aim to evaluate the relationship between cecal intubation time during colonoscopies and factors such as the patient's age, body mass index, history of constipation, Wexner constipation score, antidepressant use, and previous abdominal surgery. The objective is to assess factors that may predict longer cecal intubation times, especially in difficult colonoscopies. Prior to the procedure, informed consent will be obtained from patients scheduled for colonoscopy in the surgical endoscopy unit, and relevant information will be recorded. During the procedure, data will be collected, including cecal intubation time, if ileal intubation is performed, and the total procedure time.
The investigators plan to adopt a thorough flushing strategy when withdrawing the endoscope, and have zero tolerance for the liquid and foam in the intestinal lumen. Observe and compare the impact of this strategy with traditional limited degree suction methods on the results of colonoscopy. The research group and the control group respectively adopted a thorough flushing strategy and a limited flushing strategy, and compared the total time of colonoscopy examination, the time of withdrawal, the detection rate of polyps, the detection rate of small polyps, and the amount of flushing fluid between the two groups. Analyze the value of thorough flushing strategy for the efficiency and quality of colonoscopy examination.
The goal of this [clinical trial] is to [explore the balance time point between the waiting time for intestinal preparation after gastric emptying and quality of bowel preparation.] in [patients with painless colonoscopy]. The main question[s] it aims to answer are: [whether the gastric is empty or not 2 hours after finishing drinking 1.5 L of MgSO4 solution within 2 hours] [whether the quality of patients' bowel preparation is superior in a time period of 2-4 hours after finishing drinking 1.5 L of MgSO4 solution] Participants will [ be asked finishing the last dose of 1.5 L MgSO4 solution within 2 hours and received ultrasound gastric assessment immediately 2 or 4 hours after finishing drinking MgSO4 solution in a 15 minutes time interval until the gastric is empty. As soon as the gastric is empty, patients receive painless colonoscopy within 2 hours or 2-4 hours. Researchers will compare [patients receiving painless colonoscopy within 2 hours or 2-4 hours after finishing drinking 1.5 L of MgSO4 solution] to see if [the quality of patients' bowel preparation is superior in a time period of within 2 hours].
Colonoscopy is a complex, highly operator dependent, practical skill. The consistent attainment of key performance indicators (KPIs) by endoscopists depends primarily upon training. Local factors can make training unstructured and contingent upon the observed practice of a small number of trainers. The investigators sought to demonstrate the feasibility and impact of a virtual-live one day colonoscopy-training course.
Properly documenting withdrawal time in colonoscopy is essential for quality assessment and cost allocation. However, reporting withdrawal time has significant interobserver variability. Additionally, current manual documentation of endoscopic findings is time-consuming and distracting for the physician. This trial examines an artificial intelligence based system to determine withdrawal time and create a structured report, including high-quality images (AI) of detected polyps and landmarks.
Phase of Development : III Sponsor : DAEWOONG PHARMACEUTICAL Study Sites and Principal Investigator : Dong ll Park M.D. Ph.D , Gastroenterology Kangbuk Samsung Hospital and other 5 study sites Study Period : From the protocol approval date (institutional review board, IRB) 24 Months Investigational product : Investigational Products DWJ1609 (sodium sulfate potassium sulfate, Magnesium Sulfate Anhydrous , simethicone, sodium picosulphate) Control Products DWC202304 (sodium sulfate potassium sulfate, Magnesium Sulfate Anhydrous , simethicone) Target Diseases : A person who needs treatment before colonoscopy (X-ray, endoscopy) Number of Subjects : 214 Subjects in total (85 subjects per group, 2 groups in total, considering a 20% dropout rate)
This case series aims to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of Oral Sulfate Solution (OSS) in patients who had previously experienced poor colonoscopy preparation.
The purpose of this study is to determine the antiperistaltic effect and safety of glycopyrrolate and whether the use of glycopyrrolate is beneficial for colonoscopy and colonoscopic polypectomy.
The goal of this cross-sectional study was to explore the relationship between physical and psychological stress and the quality of bowel preparation before a colonoscopy examination, in order to improve the quality of bowel preparation. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does physical and psychological stress affect the quality of colonoscopic bowel preparation, and delay disease detection? How can we improve the quality of colonoscopy？ Participants will be asked to complete a questionnaire containing their demographics, history of diseases and drugs, lifestyle habits, and physical and 14-item perceived stress scale(PSS-14). Quality of bowel preparation was assessed by the Boston bowel preparation scale（BPS）.
In this study, the investigators will evaluate the ability of the Magnetic Flexible Endoscope (MFE) to travel through the human colon. The MFE is a device made of ultra-flexible tubing that contains a camera, light, and magnet at the tip. The tip of the tube is about the size of a penny. The magnet inside the tip allows the MFE to be moved through the colon by a second magnet attached to a robotic arm that is outside the body. The objective of this feasibility study is to determine safety and tolerability of the Magnetic Flexible Endoscope (MFE) traveling in the human colon.