View clinical trials related to Colonoscopy.
Filter by:Obesity is omnipresent problem in everyday anesthesiology practice associated with low level of blood oxygen (hypoxemia) during analgo-sedation. Overweight outpatients are often scheduled for colonoscopy usually undergo analgo-sedation. In obese patients, intravenous analgo-sedation often diminish respiratory drive causing hypoxemia. To avoid hypoxemia, low-flow nasal oxygenation (LFNO) of 2-6 L/min is applied via standard nasal catheter to provide maximum 40 % of inspired fraction of oxygen (FiO2). LFNO comprises applying cold and dry oxygen which causes discomfort to nasal mucosa of patient. LFNO is often insufficient to provide satisfying oxygenation. Insufficient oxygenation adds to circulatory instability - heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) disorder. On the other side, high-flow nasal oxygenation (HFNO) brings 20 to 70 L/min of heated and humidified of O2/air mixture up to 100% FiO2 via specially designed nasal cannula. Heated and humidified O2/air mixture is much more agreeable to patient. HFNO brings noninvasive support to patients' spontaneous breathing by producing continuous positive pressure of 3-7 cmH2O in upper airways consequently enhancing oxygenation. Investigators intend to analyze effect of HFNO vs. LFNO on oxygen saturation during procedural analgo-sedation for colonoscopy in obese adult patients. Investigators expect that obese patients with preserved spontaneous breathing, oxygenized by HFNO vs. LFNO, will be less prone to hypoxemia thus more respiratory and circulatory stable during procedural analgo-sedation for colonoscopy. Obese patients with applied HFNO should longer preserve: normal oxygen saturation, normal level of CO2 and O2, reflecting better respiratory stability. Investigators expect obese participnts to have more stable HR and BP, reflecting improved circulatory stability. There will be less interruption of breathing pattern of obese patients and less necessity for attending anesthesiologist to intervene.
Analgo-sedation is standard procedure in anesthesiology practice and is often given for colonoscopy in the setting of daily hospital. Ideally, patients should be sedated with preserved spontaneous breathing and adequate blood O2 saturation. To maintain adequate oxygenation, low-flow O2 (2-6 L/min) is usually delivered through standard nasal catheter which can provide inspired fraction (FiO2) of 40% (low-flow nasal oxygenation - LFNO). Coldness and dryness of LFNO applied may be uncomfortable to patient. Standardly applied intravenous anesthetics can lead to transient ceasing of breathing and O2 desaturation despite LFNO. Respiratory instability can also potentiate circulatory instability - undesirable changes in heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP). Unlike LFNO, high-flow heated and humidified nasal oxygenation (HFNO) is characterized by the oxygen-air mixture flow of 20 to 70 L/min up to 100% FiO2. Warm and humidified O2, delivered via soft, specially designed nasal cannula, is pleasant to patient. HFNO develops continuous positive pressure of 3 to 7 cmH2O in upper airway which enables noninvasive support to patient's spontaneous breathing thus prolonging time of adequate O2 saturation. Aim of this study is to compare effect of HFNO and LFNO on oxygenation maintenance before, during and after standardized procedure of intravenous analgo-sedation in normal weight patients of ASA risk I, II and III. Investigators hypothesize that application of HFNO compared to LFNO, in patients with preserved spontaneous breathing during procedural analgo-sedation, will contribute to maintaining of adequate oxygenation, consequentially adding to greater circulatory and respiratory patients' stability. Investigators expect that patients who receive HFNO will better maintain adequate oxygenation regarding improved spontaneous breathing. Also patients will have shorter intervals of blood oxygen desaturation, less pronounced rise in blood CO2 level and lesser fall of blood O2 level, less change in HR and BP. Investigators will have to exactly estimate partial and global respiratory insufficiency (blood CO2 and O2 levels) associated with LFNO and HFNO, which will be done by blood-gas analysis of 3 arterial blood samples collected before, during and after analgo - sedation via previously, in local anesthesia, placed arterial cannula. Possible complications will be explained in written uniformed consent and by anesthesiologist.
Background: In randomized controlled trials, split-dose bowel preparation for colonoscopy has been shown to provide better bowel cleansing than day before bowel preparation. However, people who volunteer to be in clinical trials may be more adherent to a challenging bowel preparation regimen than people in the general community undergoing colonoscopy. This may be especially true for colonoscopies scheduled for the morning, when the later dose of the split-dose bowel preparation would be administered in the early morning hours. Hence the results of the available trials may not be applicable to patients undergoing morning colonoscopy in routine medical practices. Aims: To compare the effectiveness of mandatory split-dose bowel preparation to optional split-dose bowel preparation protocols for morning colonoscopies in a non-inferiority pragmatic trial. Anticipated results and significance: The study will produce a better understanding of the most effective approach to bowel preparation for early morning colonoscopies and suggest specific recommendations for colonoscopy practice.
Quality measures in colonoscopy are important guides for improving the quality of patient care. But quality improvement intervention is not taking place, primarily because of the inconvenience and expense. To address the difficulties above, we used artificial intelligence for quality control of colonoscopy.
In sedation applications performed by an endoscopist or anesthetist during colonoscopy, it was investigated whether there were differences in pain levels evaluated by VAS (Visuel analog scale), patient satisfaction, duration of procedure and side effects
Colonoscopy is the considered gold standard for diagnosing diseases in the colon. A colonoscopy is normally divided into the insertion from anus to cecum, the technical difficult part, and a retraction or diagnostic part. No objective measure exists to evaluate the performance of a colonoscopy. Based on a movement analysis of the colonoscope we wish to seek evidence for an automated and objective system able to differentiate between endoscopists with various experience in a clinical setting. The movement analysis is based on information's from the colonoscope. Electromagnetic coils are built in along the length of colonoscopes. They generate a pulsed magnetic field that is picked up a receiver coil. The data-points for each coil are inserted into an algorithm for the movement analyzing. This analysis is done as a change between the tip of the scope, and the next tracked magnetic coil. The result is a relative movement of the colonoscope in relation to the previous position. The study is conducted a three different University Hospitals in Denmark. Twenty physicians with experience in colonoscopy are voluntary included. Patients appointed to a screening colonoscopy are included and a minimum of five consecutive colonoscopies are recorded for each physician. We predict the system to be automated and objective tool correlated with the physician's technical level of expertise in clinical colonoscopy.
Colonoscopy insertion is technically challenging, time-consuming, and painful, especially for the sigmoid. It is reported that the difficult colonoscopy score (DCS) >1 can predict the difficulty during colonoscopy. Patients with DCS>1 had longer insertion time, higher pain score and needed more abdominal compression and position changes. As reported, water-aided method colonoscopy examination is an important and useful method because it reduces discomfort and increases cecal intubation rate compared with usual air insufflation method. But a longer time was consumed for scope insertion and cecal intubation in the traditional water-aided method colonscopy(the whole water immersion). To avoid these disadvantages ,we modified whole colon water immersion(WWI) method to the sigmoid colon water immersion(SWI), where the most difficult and painful part of colonoscopy resides. If water immersion is limited to the sigmoid colon in such patients, would it be more efficient and less time consuming? The aim of this study was to investigate the application of water-aided method on cecal intubation time in potentially difficult colonoscopy. This prospective, randomized controlled study allocated patients who's difficult colonoscopy score(DCS) >1 (18-80 years) to sigmoid-colon water immersion(SWI), whole colon water immersion(WWI) or carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation (CI) group (1:1:1). The primary outcome was cecal intubation time. The secondary outcomes included the maximum pain score (0=none,10=most severe) during the insertion phase in left, transverse and right colon; cecal intubation rate; adenoma detection rate(ADR); bowel preparation quality; withdrawal time(from cecum to rectum excluding time for biopsy and polypectomy); willingness to undergo a repeat unsedated colonoscopy; number of abdominal compressions, position change during the insertion. Patients were educated to understand the meaning of visual analogue scale (VAS) (0 = no pain, 10 = most severe) and to report their maximum pain scores during the insertion through each colonic segment. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic and baseline data. Analyses were performed with SPSS software version 24.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc, IBM Company).
This is a study to compare two different, but normally, used methods of colonoscopy in patients that require a routine or repeat colonoscopy. There will be three arms in this study: WE water control, water plus Cap-1, and water plus Cap-2. The patient will prepare himself/herself for the colonoscopy as per normal instructions and he/she will be given the information for the study at that time so that he/she can make a decision to participate in the study. The control method will use water instead of air inserted into the colon. The study method will use a new accessory, a cap that will fit onto the end of the colonoscope plus water during the procedure. This study will also confirm if using the cap method with water is a better way of detecting polyps in the colon and possibly cancer.
Water exchange (WE) method has been shown to reduce medication requirement and pain experience during the colonoscopy. Cap-assisted colonoscopy aided by air may also reduced the insertion pain. Therefore, the immediate aim of this study is to assess the generalizability of the impact of WE plus cap (WECAC), as a potentially less painful insertion technique than WE. The control group will use water infusion in lieu of air insufflation during insertion of the colonoscope. The study group will added a cap onto the end of colonoscope during the WE method procedure. This study will also demonstrate if the WECAC method have a shorter insertion time and higher proximal colon adenoma detection rate (ADR) than WE alone in Veterans.
For evaluation of the usefulness of oral sulfate solution (OSS) for bowel preparation of elderly people, investigators compare the efficacy, tolerability and safety between OSS and 2L polyethylene glycol (PEG) with ascorbic acid (Asc).