View clinical trials related to Chronic Coronary Syndrome.
Filter by:The goal of this randomized, double-blinded, controlled clinical trial is to investigate if treatment with an sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2) during the unique time window before coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), can reduce the incidence of post-operative atrial fibrillation and/or acute kidney injury in patients with chronic coronary syndrome. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Does treatment with an SGLT2 inhibitor during the waiting time and stable post-operative period, in patients with chronic coronary syndrome scheduled for CABG, reduce the risk of new onset atrial fibrillation compared to placebo? - Does treatment with an SGLT2 inhibitor during the waiting time and stable post-operative period, in patients with chronic coronary syndrome scheduled for CABG, reduce the risk of acute kidney injury before hospital discharge compared to placebo? Participants will be administered dapagliflozin 10 mg once daily or placebo for a minimum of seven days while awaiting scheduled CABG and up until discharge, with a short interruption for surgery. The active arm will be compared to the placebo arm to see if dapagliflozin can reduce the incidence of post-operative atrial fibrillation and/or acute kidney injury.
To further improve the outcome of ACS it is strongly needed to identify new therapeutic targets. This is possible only by improving our knowledge of the multiple molecular mechanisms leading to coronary instability through several pathways. The goal of this project is to define the molecular mechanisms responsible for the four different presentations of ACS, to identify biomarkers for their noninvasive identification and potential new therapeutic targets, thus promoting precision medicine.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the use of a specific drug eluting balloon (Magic Touch, Concept Medical®) versus standard drug eluting stent based strategies in patients with long coronary lesions. Participants with chronic coronary disease and long coronary stenosis will be randomly assign to be treated either with Magic Touch balloon or drug eluting stent.
In daily clinical routine, the evaluation of new-onset and stable chest pain (SCP) suggestive of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) remains a challenge for physicians. Although coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) seems to be the first-line cardiac imaging testing (CIT) according to the recommendations from current guidelines, the optimal diagnostic strategy to identify low risk patients who may derive minimal benefit from further CIT is the cornerstone of clinical management for SCP. Recently, different diagnostic strategies were provided to effectively defer unnecessary CIT, but few studies have prospectively determined the actual effect of applying these strategies in clinical practice. Therefore, the OPERATE study was designed to compare the effectiveness and safety of two proposed diagnostic strategies in identification of low risk individual who may derive minimal benefit from CCTA among patients with SCP suggestive of CCS in a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT).
AID-ANGIO is an observational, prospective, single arm, longitudinal study. Its objective is to investigate the diagnostic yield of the systematic use of a diagnostic strategy hierarchically addressing both obstructive and non-obstructive causes of myocardial ischaemia in an all-comers population of patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) undergoing invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Angiographically severe-grade stenosis (≥70%) can be safely considered flow-limiting without further physiological assessment. Conversely, by means of a pressure guidewire, intermediate-grade stenosis would be evaluated with fractional flow reserve (FFR) and/or non-hyperaemic pressure ratios (NHPR) in order to determine if they are physiologically relevant. Those patients with non-obstructive CAD or normal epicardial coronary arteries would undergo functional coronary tests to investigate the presence of microcirculatory and vasomotor coronary disorders, which would account for non-obstructive causes of ischaemia. The main hypothesis of AID-ANGIO study states that, in patients with CCS referred to ICA, the application of a structured strategy -including ICA, physiological assessment of intermediate-grade stenosis and functional coronary tests- leads to a high diagnostic accuracy.
The use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) to assess the functional relevance of coronary stenoses has been demonstrated to reduce the risk urgent revascularization in chronic coronary syndrome patients.[1] The goal of this study is to assess whether the utility of using FFR during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in chronic coronary syndrome patients is confirmed in a real-life scenario. This study will implement a regression discontinuity design (RDD). RDD is a quasi-experimental study design able to provide robust findings on causality using observational data.
This study evaluates a new diagnostic approach based on intracoronary electrocardiogram (icECG) ST-segment shift remission time, denoted as τ-icECG (τ=tau, i.e., the remission half-time fitted by an exponential function to the disappearing ST-segment shift), to be used for PCI guidance.
Although there are numerous studies that have demonstrated the impact of systemic inflammation on coronary plaque vulnerability, there are few literature data regarding the influence of coronary plaque localization within the coronary tree (right and left coronary artery, proximal, mid-coronary and distal), on plaque composition, morphology and degree of vulnerability, in relation with systemic inflammation and coronary hemodynamics. The aim of this study is to identify: (1) the impact of plaque topography in different sites within the coronary tree (right versus left, proximal distal) on their vulnerability degree evaluated with CCTA; (2) the relationship between degree of plaque vulnerability, systemic inflammatory biomarkers and specific hemodynamic characteristics quantified by coronary shear stress computations. The study will include 100 patients with stable coronary artery disease for which data collection will be perform on: (1) Clinical, echocardiographic and ECG data; (2) cardiovascular risk assessment; (3) 128 slice CCTA evaluation of coronary tree anatomy, plaque morphology, composition and vulnerability degree; (4) systemic inflammation based on serum levels of hsCRP, IL-6, MMP-9, periostin, adhesion molecules (5) shear stress via coronary flow computational simulations.
Aim of this prospective, interventional, single-center, randomized study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intermittent hypoxic-hyperoxic training (IHHT) as a rehabilitation method in patients with cardiovascular pathology in the early period after coronavirus infection. The study will include 60 patients with cardiovascular pathology who underwent confirmed by laboratory tests COVID-19 infection 1-3 months ago with the degree of lung lesion CT3, CT4, who were admitted to the University Clinical Hospital No. 4 of I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University. The patients will be divided into 2 groups (intervention and control groups). Intervention group will inhale hypoxic gas mixtures (10-12% O2) followed by exposure to a hyperoxic gas mixture with 30-35% O2 5 times a week for 3 weeks, while control group will undergo a simulated IHHT. All the patients will undergo identical laboratory and instrumental testing before IHHT, after the last IHHT procedure, in a month after the last IHHT procedure and in 6 months. Estimated result of the study is to confirm or refute the hypothesis of the study that a three-week course of IHHT in patients with cardiovascular pathology in the early period after coronavirus infection can improve exercise tolerance, as well as the quality of life and psychoemotional status, and affect the dynamics of laboratory and instrumental parameters.
The ASET Japan Pilot study is a multicenter, single arm, open-label trial of single antiplatelet therapy with prasugrel for patients undergoing successful and optimal Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) for Chronic Coronary Syndrome (CCS) and Non-ST elevation Acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). The enrollment consists of two phases: i) 200 patients presenting with CCS; ii) 200 patients presenting with NSTE-ACS. The patients will be loaded with standard dual antiplatelet therapy according to local practice (usually aspirin 81 to 330 mg and clopidogrel 300 mg or prasugrel 20 mg or ticagrelor 180 mg, unless patient is on long-term therapy) prior to the PCI procedure. After PCI, if the results are considered to be satisfactory by the operator based on clinical (e.g. clinical status, ECG, etc.), angiographic and/or findings from intracoronary imaging, only then patients will be enrolled in the study and loaded with prasugrel 20 mg if the patients have not loaded prasugrel prior to PCI or have not taken a maintenance dose of prasugrel before the index PCI. Patients continued with prasugrel only (3.75 mg once a day) for three months in CCS patients and for 12 months in NSTE-ACS patients. Aspirin, clopidogrel, and ticagrelor will be discontinued just after the index procedure. i. CCS patients (phase 1): At the 3-months follow-up visit, prasugrel monotherapy will be replaced by aspirin monotherapy or dual-antiplatelet therapy according to local standard of care. Clinical follow-up with office visit will be performed at 3 months and telephone contacts at 1, and 4 months (final follow-up). ii. NSTE-ACS patients (phase 2): At the 12-months follow-up visit, prasugrel monotherapy will be replaced by aspirin monotherapy for an observational period of 1 month, followed by antiplatelet treatment according to local practice. Clinical follow-up with office visit will be performed at 1 and 12 months and telephone contacts at 3, 6, 9 and 13 months (final follow-up). All events will be adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee (CEC). An independent Data Safety and Monitoring Board (DSMB) will monitor the individual and collective safety of the patients in the study during enrolment of CCS patients and up to 3 months follow-up of CCS patients, and during enrollment of NSTE-ACS patients and up to 12 months follow-up of NSTE-ACS patients (timepoint for primary endpoint).