View clinical trials related to Chronic Coronary Syndrome.
Filter by:The ASET Japan Pilot study is a multicenter, single arm, open-label trial of single antiplatelet therapy with prasugrel for patients undergoing successful and optimal Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) for Chronic Coronary Syndrome (CCS) and Non-ST elevation Acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). The enrollment consists of two phases: i) 200 patients presenting with CCS; ii) 200 patients presenting with NSTE-ACS. The patients will be loaded with standard dual antiplatelet therapy according to local practice (usually aspirin 81 to 330 mg and clopidogrel 300 mg or prasugrel 20 mg or ticagrelor 180 mg, unless patient is on long-term therapy) prior to the PCI procedure. After PCI, if the results are considered to be satisfactory by the operator based on clinical (e.g. clinical status, ECG, etc.), angiographic and/or findings from intracoronary imaging, only then patients will be enrolled in the study and loaded with prasugrel 20 mg if the patients have not loaded prasugrel prior to PCI or have not taken a maintenance dose of prasugrel before the index PCI. Patients continued with prasugrel only (3.75 mg once a day) for three months in CCS patients and for 12 months in NSTE-ACS patients. Aspirin, clopidogrel, and ticagrelor will be discontinued just after the index procedure. i. CCS patients (phase 1): At the 3-months follow-up visit, prasugrel monotherapy will be replaced by aspirin monotherapy or dual-antiplatelet therapy according to local standard of care. Clinical follow-up with office visit will be performed at 3 months and telephone contacts at 1, and 4 months (final follow-up). ii. NSTE-ACS patients (phase 2): At the 12-months follow-up visit, prasugrel monotherapy will be replaced by aspirin monotherapy for an observational period of 1 month, followed by antiplatelet treatment according to local practice. Clinical follow-up with office visit will be performed at 1 and 12 months and telephone contacts at 3, 6, 9 and 13 months (final follow-up). All events will be adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee (CEC). An independent Data Safety and Monitoring Board (DSMB) will monitor the individual and collective safety of the patients in the study during enrolment of CCS patients and up to 3 months follow-up of CCS patients, and during enrollment of NSTE-ACS patients and up to 12 months follow-up of NSTE-ACS patients (timepoint for primary endpoint).
This study is performed to compare the angiographic and clinical outcomes of the use of single long stent versus overlapping stents in the treatment of long coronary lesions in patients with chronic coronary syndrome.
The containment associated with the VIDOC-19 pandemic creates an unprecedented societal situation of physical and social isolation. Our hypothesis is that in patients with chronic diseases, confinement leads to changes in health behaviours, adherence to pharmacological treatment, lifestyle rules and increased psychosocial stress with an increased risk of deterioration in their health status in the short, medium and long term. Some messages about the additional risk/danger associated with taking certain drugs in the event of COVID disease have been widely disseminated in the media since March 17, 2020, the date on which containment began in France. This is the case, for example, for corticosteroids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs but also for converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE inhibitors) and angiotensin II receptor antagonists (ARBs2). These four major classes of drugs are widely prescribed in patients with chronic diseases, diseases specifically selected in our study (corticosteroids: haematological malignancies, multiple sclerosis, Horton's disease; ACE inhibitors/ARAs2: heart failure, chronic coronary artery disease). Aspirin used at low doses as an anti-platelet agent in coronary patients as a secondary prophylaxis after a myocardial infarction can be stopped by some patients who consider aspirin to be a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Discontinuation of this antiplatelet agent, which must be taken for life after an infarction, exposes the patient to a major risk of a new cardiovascular event. The current difficulty of access to care due to travel restrictions (a theoretical limit in the context of French confinement but a priori very real), the impossibility of consulting overloaded doctors, or the cancellation of medical appointments, medical and surgical procedures due to the reorganization of our hospital and private health system to better manage COVID-19 patients also increases the risk of worsening the health status of chronic patients who by definition require regular medical monitoring. Eight Burgundian cohorts of patients with chronic diseases (chronic coronary artery disease, heart failure, multiple sclerosis, Horton's disease, AMD, haemopathic malignancy, chronic respiratory failure (idiopathic fibrosis, PAH) haemophilia cohort) will study the health impact of the containment related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
New-generation metallic drug-eluting stents represent the standard of care among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Currently, few data are available as regards to the safety and efficacy of the Cre8 amphilimus-eluting stent (Cre8 AES, Alvimedica, Instanbul, Turkey) in comparison with the biodegradable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (Synergy EES, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA). Results from randomized trials and meta-analyses consistently indicate that prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after PCI reduces ischemic events, but invariably conveys an excess of clinically relevant bleeding, which is proportional to the duration of treatment. It has been estimated, indeed, that for every non-fatal ischemic event avoided with prolonged DAPT, two or more clinically relevant bleeding events have to be expected. Given the trade-off between benefits and risks and the lack of mortality benefit in favor of prolonged DAPT, expert consensus suggests that DAPT duration should be individualized based on ischemic versus bleeding risks. At this regard, the DAPT score has been recently proposed as standardized tool to identify patients who derive benefit or lack from a prolonged course of DAPT. However, a prospective assessment of the DAPT score is lacking and whether a personalized duration of DAPT based on the DAPT score improves the net clinical benefit remains unknown. The objective of the study is to compared the safety and the efficacy of the Cre8 AES with the Synergy EES and a personalized DAPT duration based on the DAPT score with a standard DAPT duration among patients undergoing PCI.
This study is a prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled clinical study. It developed an innovative Tai Chi Cardiac Rehabilitation Program (TCCRP) for patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) and evaluated the efficacy, acceptability and safety of TCCRP on patients with CCS in order to explore the possible mechanism of its feasibility.