The Impact of Inhalation vs Total Intravenous Anesthesia on the Immune Status and Mortality in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery: a Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial. — TeMP

Breast Cancer Clinical Trial

Official title:
The Impact of Inhalation vs Total Intravenous Anesthesia on the Immune Status and Mortality in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery: a Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial (TeMP - Trial).

Status Recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

Even decade ago it was believed that the choice method of anesthesia did not affect the course of the oncological process, but recent evidence has begun to emerge that inhalation anesthesia vs TIVA is associated with a higher number of adverse outcomes. Apparently, it makes sense to conduct mRCT in order to assess the effect of IA on immune system in patients operated on for breast cancer comprehensively. The results of that kind of RCT may finally give us an answer whether the choice of anesthesia affects the immune status of patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer. The evaluation of complications and long-term survival will allow to recommend to use or not to use IA for this type of surgery. Objective: The Impact of Inhalation vs Total Intravenous Anesthesia on the Immune Status and Mortality in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery

Clinical Trial Description

The power calculation for this study was based on an assessment of Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients undergoing breast cancer resection with total intravenous and inhalation anesthesia in two studies: 1. Cho J.S. et al., 2017 - 48 patients (PMID: 28924368, TIVA group: NLR = 3.37 ± 1.27; inhalation group: NLR = 3.85 ± 1.46) 2. Ní Eochagáin A. et al., 2018 - 116 patients (PMID: 29457215, TIVA group: NLR = 3.20 ± 1.37; inhalation group: NLR = 4.10 ± 1.90). The pooled mean NLR in the TIVA group is 3.25±1.34, in the inhalation anesthesia group: 4.03±1.78. Difference in means (effect size): 0.78, for level α=0.05, power 1-β=80% and expected standard deviation of 1.5, 65 patients in each group should be recruited, taking into account a 10% margin (total number of patients: 130). ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT04800393
Study type	Interventional
Source	Moscow Clinical Scientific Center
Contact	Valerii Subbotin, PhD
Phone	+79166122504
Email	subbotin67@mail.ru
Status	Recruiting
Phase	N/A
Start date	March 29, 2022
Completion date	April 1, 2028

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Recruiting	`NCT04681911` - Inetetamab Combined With Pyrotinib and Chemotherapy in the Treatment of HER2 Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer	Phase 2
Completed	`NCT04890327` - Web-based Family History Tool	N/A
Terminated	`NCT04066790` - Pyrotinib or Trastuzumab Plus Nab-paclitaxel as Neoadjuvant Therapy in HER2-positive Breast Cancer	Phase 2
Completed	`NCT03591848` - Pilot Study of a Web-based Decision Aid for Young Women With Breast Cancer, During the Proposal for Preservation of Fertility	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT03954197` - Evaluation of Priming Before in Vitro Maturation for Fertility Preservation in Breast Cancer Patients	N/A
Terminated	`NCT02202746` - A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of the VEGFR-FGFR-PDGFR Inhibitor, Lucitanib, Given to Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer	Phase 2
Active, not recruiting	`NCT01472094` - The Hurria Older PatiEnts (HOPE) With Breast Cancer Study
Withdrawn	`NCT06057636` - Hypnosis for Pain in Black Women With Advanced Breast Cancer: A Feasibility Study	N/A
Completed	`NCT06049446` - Combining CEM and Magnetic Seed Localization of Non-Palpable Breast Tumors
Recruiting	`NCT05560334` - A Single-Arm, Open, Exploratory Clinical Study of Pemigatinib in the Treatment of HER2-negative Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With FGFR Alterations	Phase 2
Active, not recruiting	`NCT05501769` - ARV-471 in Combination With Everolimus for the Treatment of Advanced or Metastatic ER+, HER2- Breast Cancer	Phase 1
Recruiting	`NCT04631835` - Phase I Study of the HS-10352 in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer	Phase 1
Completed	`NCT04307407` - Exercise in Breast Cancer Survivors	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT03544762` - Correlation of 16α-[18F]Fluoro-17β-estradiol PET Imaging With ESR1 Mutation	Phase 3
Terminated	`NCT02482389` - Study of Preoperative Boost Radiotherapy	N/A
Enrolling by invitation	`NCT00068003` - Harvesting Cells for Experimental Cancer Treatments
Completed	`NCT00226967` - Stress, Diurnal Cortisol, and Breast Cancer Survival
Recruiting	`NCT06019325` - Rhomboid Intercostal Plane Block on Chronic Pain Incidence and Acute Pain Scores After Mastectomy	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06006390` - CEA Targeting Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Lymphocytes (CAR-T) in the Treatment of CEA Positive Advanced Solid Tumors	Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting	`NCT06037954` - A Study of Mental Health Care in People With Cancer	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.