View clinical trials related to Bowel Cancer.
Filter by:The study team will look at 3 new tests that will make it easier to measure frailty in patients awaiting surgery for cancer and compare them against standard clinical measures of frailty in a pilot study. The expected outcome is that evidence will be collated in order to apply for a major grant to look at improving the care of frail patients with cancer in the future.
This project aim to investigate whether wireless capsule endoscopy(WCE) has a similar diagnostic yield as conventional endoscopy in detecting the cause of iron deficiency anemia (IDA)
The goal of this non-randomised trial is to test how a workshop that includes religiously-tailored messages can help increase the uptake of breast, colorectal and cervical cancer screening among Muslim women in North East England and Scotland. The results of this trial will inform the development of a full-scale randomised-controlled trial. Participants in this study will be asked to take part in a two-hour workshop, deliver either online or in-person.
The CESCAIL study tests the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on a video taken from a minimally-invasive imaging device, to improve efficiency and accuracy of the detection of polyps, which are little outgrowths within the lining of the bowel.
Failures in non-technical skills (NTS) contribute to adverse events in healthcare. Previous research has explored the assessment and training of these skills, and yet there is a lack of evidence for their impact on clinical outcomes. Gastrointestinal endoscopy is a high-pressure specialty, but to date there is little on the role of NTS in this area, or a method for their assessment. This MD project aims to measure NTS in endoscopy, explore their relationship with clinical outcomes, and identify those specific to this area of healthcare. Methods An observational study of endoscopy teams in real time, using the Oxford NOTECHS II assessment tool. Comparison of NTS performance with procedure outcomes and patient satisfaction. A qualitative interview study with staff members to establish the NTS specifically relevant to working in gastrointestinal endoscopy.
The LumenEye scope and CHiP platform will be piloted in a number of clinical settings including remote colorectal clinics. The rationale is to perform an initial pilot study to determine the clinical utility of the LumenEye device for use in primary and secondary care settings. The main hypothesis is that digital rectoscopy is safe and acceptable to clinicians including general practitioners and can significantly reduce the burden of endoscopy referral to and within secondary care centres.
Colonoscopy is the technique of choice for the evaluation of the mucosa of the colon. To be able to do the procedure in optimal conditions, it needs to be clean. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out a preparation as safe and tolerable as possible. This preparation generally consists in a low residue diet the days before the colonoscopy and in the intake of a laxative solution. In previous studies, it has been shown that the low residue diet does not play a relevant role as it was considered before. Recent studies demonstrated that reducing the days of low residue diet does not worsen the cleansing and improves the patient experience. The results of this study are required for determining the role of diet restrictive diet in colon cleansing.
Bowel cancer is the 3rd most common cancer in males and females. Most bowel cancers develop from precancerous polyps in the bowel. Colonoscopy can detect and remove these polyps, thereby reducing the risk of developing bowel cancer. However, colonoscopy is an invasive procedure with inherent risk, and can be both uncomfortable and embarrassing to undergo. The risks and numerous other barriers often mean colonoscopy, and cancer preventing polyp removal, is not performed. The investigators aim to start the first in-human feasibility clinical investigation of a robotic magnetic colonoscope in 2021. The new device aims to reduce the discomfort and risk associated with colonoscopy. As part of the patient and end user involvement aspect of the project the investigators aim to perform a mixed methodology inductive type research project exploring experiences of colonoscopy for patient and endoscopists. The study will follow an exploratory mixed methodology format with two parallel work-streams for patients and endoscopists. Each work-stream will consisting of a focus groups (1-2 for each patients and endoscopists), followed by 20 endoscopist and 30 patient in-depth interviews, then an online questionnaire. Each stage will be thematically analysed to form the semi-structured questions for the next stage. The target population will be endoscopists who perform colonoscopy and people who have undergone, or refused to undergo, a colonoscopy. Focus groups will be performed in groups of 6-10 participants, and both interview and focus groups will be performed via video/teleconferencing.
The identification of patients with colorectal cancer is challenging as they present with a variable symptom profile and require invasive tests (colonoscopy) for diagnosis (through histological analysis of biopsies) and complimented by cross-sectional radiology, prior to commencement of treatment. The biopsy forms the basis of the diagnosis and management planning for a patient with colorectal cancer through the multidisciplinary team. The biggest challenge currently faced in the management of colorectal cancer is the accurate identification of patients who present with various symptoms none of which are specific for bowel cancer. Currently the NICE referral guidelines are used to determine the appropriateness of referral pathway, i.e. Fast-Track/Two-Week Wait referral. A recent review of over 10000 referrals revealed a colorectal cancer diagnosis in 4.1% of referrals. Previous literature reports rates as high as 8%, but in series of cases with only 72-89% adherence to the referral guidance leading to at best 40% of all colorectal cases being diagnosed through this route. The remainder of colorectal cancers being diagnosed through the bowel cancer screening programme (NBCSP), non-two-week wait referrals and other processes such as emergency admissions. Inherently the Two-Week Wait pathway refers a large volume of "symptomatic patients" and it has become a "cancer exclusion pathway." Once cancer has been excluded, patients are often discharged back to General Practice, yet the patients often still have symptoms. The current Covid-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the already pressed Two-Week pathway impacting on the reduction of endoscopic and radiological appointments available leading to delays in treatment. Each test performed in the diagnostic pathway has a significant financial, personal, and institutional resource profile. It is our aim to develop a novel diagnostic device based upon the identification of genetic mutations and genomic alterations from material trapped in the rectal mucous layer allowing focused endoscopic assessment, confirmation/exclusion of cancer diagnosis from cross-sectional imaging in those unfit for endoscopic examination and identification of high-risk lesions (dysplasia). This would allow a greater triage, and focus colonoscopic services onto therapeutic procedures, improving overall care.
Investigation of the role of adding oral antibiotics to preoperative mechanical bowel preparation before colorectal surgery for cancer.